Mock jurors’ awareness of age-related changes in memory and cognitive capacity

References

• Adorno, T.W., Levinson, D.J., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Aizpura, A., Migueles, M., & Garcia-Bajos, E. (2014). Accuracy of eyewitness memory for events in young and older adults. In M. P. Toglia, D. F. Ross, J. Pozzulo, & E. Pica (Eds.), The elderly eyewitness in court (pp. 210–231) New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, M., Brimacombe, C.A., Hunter, M.A., & Kadlec, H. (2006). Young and older eyewitnesses’ use of narrative features in testimony. Discourse Processes, 41(3), 289–314. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4103_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrewartha, A.M. (2014). An analysis of the jury’s role in detecting lies, assessing credibility, and decision making (Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (1985). Evidence (Vol. 26). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, S., & Seymour, F. (2014). Prediction of jury verdicts in child sexual assault trials. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 21, 567–576. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.856278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B.H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63–67. doi:10.1177/0963721410397282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V., Lynd-Stevenson, R., & Pigram, D. (1993). An empirical study of ageism: From polemics to scientific utility. Australian Psychologist, 28(1), 9–15. doi:10.1080/00050069308258857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D.A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004). The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(1), 154–166. doi:10.1375/pplt.2004.11.1.154
   Google Scholar
• Brimacombe, C.A., Jung, S., Garrioch, L., & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: Will you believe me when I’m 64? Law and Human Behavior, 27(5), 507–522. doi:10.1023/A:1025486006769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimacombe, C.A., Quinton, N., Nance, N., & Garrioch, L. (1997). Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old adult eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 619–634. doi:10.1023/A:1024808730667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, P.G., & O’Hanlon, A. (2008). Ageing and adaptation. In R. Woods & L. Clare (Eds.), Clinical psychology of ageing (pp. 17–32). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Comrey, A.L., & Lee, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M.A. (2012). Ten things the law and others should know about human memory. In L. Nadel & W. P. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Memory and law (pp. 359–372). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D.J. (2012). Jury decision making: The state of the science. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D.J., & Caughlin, D.E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. doi:10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, C.S., & Krueger, L.E. (2006). I misremember it well: Why older adults are unreliable eyewitnesses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 770–775. doi:10.3758/BF03193995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J.M. (2012). Ready for the psychologists: Learning from eyewitness errors. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 48, 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (2006). The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice (Vol. 92). Sydney: Nsw Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J.L., Krismer, K., MacDonald, J.E., & Cunningham, J.A. (1994). Severity of penalty, seriousness of the charge, and mock jurors’ verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 18(2), 189–202. doi:10.1007/BF01499015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Martschuk, N. (2017). Using pretest-posttest research designs to enhance jury decisions. Newcastle Law Review, 12, 86–103.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Brewer, N., Clough, J., Horan, J., Ogloff, J., Tait, D., & Pratley, J. (2007). Practices, policies and procedures that influence juror satisfaction in Australia (Research and Public Policy Series, 87). Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Ockenden, E. (2016). Effects of terrorist charges and threatening conduct on mock jurors’ decisions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(5), 696–708. doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1120247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, R.H., Reiser, L., Garcia, R.J., Koeu, C., & Scurich, N. (2018). Impact of gruesome photographic evidence on legal decisions: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 503–521. doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1440468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray-Eurom, K., Seaberg, D.C., & Wears, R.L. (2002). The prosecution of sexual assault cases: Correlation with forensic evidence. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39(1), 39–46. doi:10.1067/mem.2002.118013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M., & Graycar, A. (2000). Preventing crime against older Australians. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series 32.
   Google Scholar
• Judicial Commission of New South Wales. (2016). Criminal trial courts benchbook: Trial procedure. Retrieved from https://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/benchbks/criminal/the_jury.html
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H.F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. doi:10.1177/001316447403400115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N.L. (1978). Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1431–1442. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, M.E., Stockdale, G., Whitley, B., & Johnson, B. (2005). Attitudes towards younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 241–266. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, M.J., & Wagner, L.S. (2002). Attitudes towards older adults. In Nelson, T. D. (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong See, S.T., Hoffman, H.G., & Wood, T. (2001). Perceptions of an elderly eyewitness: Is the older eyewitness believable? Psychology and Aging, 16(2), 346–350. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(8), 2010–2038. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2009). Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 15, 619–634. doi:10.1080/10683160802477757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M.W., & Wilson, D.B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lundrigan, S., Dhami, M.K., & Mueller-Johnson, K. (2018). A re-examination of the acquittal biasing effect of offence seriousness. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(5), 769–778. doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1478334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martschuk, N., & Sporer, S.L. (2018). Memory of faces in old age: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 33, 904–923. doi:10.1037/pag0000282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martschuk, N., Sporer, S.L., & Sauerland, M. (2019). Confidence of older eyewitnesses: Is it diagnostic of identification accuracy? Open Psychology, 1(1), 132–151. doi:10.1515/psych-2018-0010
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W.C., & Noll, M.E. (1974). Effects of seriousness of charge and punishment the judgments of simulated jurors. The Psychological Record, 24(4), 545–547. doi:10.1007/BF03394276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadler, J., & Rose, M.R. (2003). Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment. Cornell Law Review, 88, 419–456. doi:10.2139/ssrn.377521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T.M.S., Christiansen, A., Bornstein, B.H., & Robicheaux, T.R. (2012). The effects of mock jurors’ beliefs about eyewitness performance on trial judgments. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 49–64. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.587815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, N., McCoy, M.L., Clark, H.L., & Shaw, L.A. (1999). The testimony of elderly victim/witnesses and their impact on juror decisions: The importance of examining multiple stereotypes. Law and Human Behavior, 23(4), 413–423. doi:10.1023/A:1022308014652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D.C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N.S., Smith, A.D., & Smith, P.K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299–320. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.2.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J.M., Law, J.R., Skene, J.A.G., Beskind, D.H., Vidmar, N., Ball, D.A., … Skene, J.H.P. (2018). Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), 856–866. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, A.E., Toglia, M.P., Leone, C.T., & Mueller-Johnson, A.U. (2014). Testimony by the elderly in the eyes of the jury: The impact of juror characteristics. In M. P. Toglia, D. F. Ross, J. Pozzulo & E. Pica (Eds.), The elderly eyewitness in court (pp. 363–382). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Courts. (2016). Supreme and District Courts Benchbook: 24 general summing up directions. Retrieved from http://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/86022/sd-bb-24-summing-up-general.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, D.F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M.P., & Ceci, S. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/BF01055786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, M.J. & Spellman, B.A. (2016). The psychological foundations of evidence law. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schieber, F. (2006). Vision and aging. In J. E. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 129–161). Burlington, VT: Elvesier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1969). Social psychology. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sporer, S.L. (2008). Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(6), 737–757. doi:10.1002/acp.1479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S.L., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2009). Disparities in sentencing decisions. In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 379–401). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• The British Psychological Society Research Board. (2010). Guidelines on memory and the law: Recommendations from the scientific study of human memory. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Trimboli, L. (2008). Juror understanding of judicial instructions in criminal trials. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice (Vol. 119). Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. (2018). Crimes against older people in Victoria. Melbourne, VIC: Crime Statistics Agency. Retrieved from https://www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au/research-and-evaluation/publications/victims/crimes-against-older-people-in-victoria
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M.W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis (Computer Software). State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G.L., Kovera, M.B., Douglass, A.B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C.A., & Wixted, J.T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44(1), 3–36. doi:10.1037/lhb0000359
   Google Scholar