Eliciting human intelligence: police source handlers’ perceptions and experiences of rapport during covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) interactions

References

• Abbe, A., & Brandon, S.E. (2013). The role of rapport in investigative interviewing: A review. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10(3), 237–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L., & Alison, E. (2017). Revenge versus rapport: Interrogation, terrorism, and torture. American Psychologist, 72(3), 266–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L.J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 411–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., Waring, S., & Christiansen, P. (2014). The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(4), 421–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L., Giles, S., & McGuire, G. (2015). Blood from a stone: Why rapport works and torture doesn’t in ‘enhanced’ interrogations. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 7(2), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, R. (2001). Informers’ careers: Motivations and change. In R. Billingsley, T. Nemitz, & P. Bean (Eds.), Informers: Policing, policy, practice (pp. 81–97). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Billingsley, R. (2003). The police informer/handler relationship: Is it really unique? International Journal of Police Science & Management, 5(1), 50–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1350/2Fijps.5.1.50.11241
   Google Scholar
• Bird, C.M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 226–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birtchnell, J. (2014). The interpersonal circle and the interpersonal octagon: A confluence of ideas. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 21, 62–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper. (Ed.), The handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2014). Investigative interviewing. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: science and practice. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, B. (2015). The use of juvenile covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) in England: An exploratory study. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P., Alison, L., & Alison, E. (2018). Well begun is half done: Interpersonal behaviours in distinct field interrogations with high‐value detainees. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23(1), 68–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. (2014). Ex-CIA director Petraeus says he opposed detainee torture. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/ex-cia-director-petraeus-says-he-opposed-torture-1418314146
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme. London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2016). Interviewing suspects in England and Wales: A National Evaluation of PEACE interviewing: One decade later. In D. Walsh, G. Oxburgh, A. Redlich, & T. Mykleburst (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation, vol 2. Suspects. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2011). A captive audience – recruiting informants within police custody blocks. Paper presented at Cambridge Executive Programme, 4th international EBP conference. Retrieved from http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/events/conferences/ebp/2011/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J.R., Meissner, C.A., Brandon, S.E., Russano, M.B., & Kleinman, S.M. (2010). Criminal versus HUMINT interrogations: The importance of psychological science to improving interrogative practice. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38(1–2), 215–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800110
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (2002). Disruptive voices: The possibilities for feminist research. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, M.B., Leary, T.F., Ossorio, A.G., & Coffey, H.S. (1951). The interpersonal dimension of personality. Journal of Personality, 20(2), 143–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1951.tb01518.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Howes, L.M. (2016). Social persuasion to develop rapport in high-stakes interviews: Qualitative analyses of Asian-Pacific practices. Policing and Society, 26(3), 270–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2014.942848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman‐Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M.K. (2014). Interviewing high value detainees: Securing cooperation and disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883–897. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychological research: Gathering and analysing data. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, M., & Sheptycki, J.W. (2004). From detection to disruption. International Criminal Justice Review, 14(1), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2F105756770401400101
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. (2018). Detainee mistreatment and rendition: 2001–2010. Retrieved from https://isc.independent.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• James, A. (2013). Examining intelligence-led policing: Developments in research, policy and practice. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., Phythian, M., Wadie, F., & Richards, J. (2016). What works in intelligence? Unpublished manuscript, a report for the UK College of Policing.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, S.M. (2006). KUBARK counterintelligence interrogation review: Observations of an interrogator. Interrogation: Science and Art, 209, 95–140.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M.J. (2005). Rapport: A key to treatment success. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 11(4), 262–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.05.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., Keeping, Z., Snook, B., & Luther, K. (2016). Do not lie to me, or else: The effect of a turncoat warning and rapport building on perceptions of police interviewers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(3), 263–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9219-4
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1997). Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory, 5(5), 639–656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/741941481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., Moyers, T.B., Ernst, D., & Amrhein, P. (2008). Manual for the motivational interviewing skill code (MISC) Version 2.1. Retrieved from http://casaa.unm.edu/download/misc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (1992). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (2011). The effects of evidence on the outcome of interviews with criminal suspects. Police Practice and Research, 12(6), 518–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2011.563963
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, UK: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Poyser, S., Nurse, A., & Milne, R. (2018). Miscarriages of justice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redlich, A.D., Kelly, C.E., & Miller, J.C. (2014). The who, what, and why of human intelligence gathering: Self‐reported measures of interrogation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 817–828. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (EW). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/23/contents
   Google Scholar
• Risan, P., Binder, P.E., & Milne, R.J. (2016). Emotional intelligence in police interviews—approach, training and the usefulness of the concept. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 410–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1234143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rollnick, S., & Miller, W.R. (1995). What is motivational interviewing? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(4), 325–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S135246580001643X
   Google Scholar
• Russano, M.B., Narchet, F.M., Kleinman, S.M., & Meissner, C.A. (2014). Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 847–859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semel, M.D. (2012). Military interrogations: Best practices and beliefs. New York, NY: City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stanier, I.P. (2013). Contemporary organisational pathologies in police information sharing: New contributions to Sheptycki’s lexicon of intelligence led policing (Unpublished doctoral thesis). London Metropolitan University, London.
   Google Scholar
• Stanier, I.P., & Nunan, J. (2018). Reframing intelligence interviews: The applicability of psychological research to HUMINT elicitation. In A. Griffiths & R. Milne (Eds.), Psychology of investigation: Theory into practice (pp. 226–248). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G.W., & Ussher, J.M. (2001). Making sense of S&M: A discourse analytic account. Sexualities, 4(3), 293–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2F136346001004003002
   Google Scholar
• Tickle-Degnen, L. (2002). Client-centered practice, therapeutic relationship, and the use of research evidence. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(4), 470–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.4.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0104_1
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, A.G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1–2), 75–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vallano, J.P., Evans, J.R., Schreiber Compo, N., & Kieckhaefer, J.M. (2015). Rapport‐building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 369–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J.P., & Schreiber Compo, N. (2011). A comfortable witness is a good witness: Rapport‐building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock‐crime interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 960–970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderhallen, M., Vervaeke, G., & Holmberg, U. (2011). Witness and suspect perceptions of working alliance and interviewing style. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 110–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2012). Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27(1), 73–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9087-x
   Google Scholar
• Zunin, L., & Zunin, N. (1972). Contact: The first four minutes. New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar