Rater experience and the predictive validity of Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version scores

References

• Bobko, P., Roth, P.L., & Bobko, C. (2001). Correcting the effect size of d for range restriction and unreliability. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 46–61. doi:10.1177/109442810141003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M.T., Rufino, K.A., Jeon, H., & Murrie, D.C. (2017). Does the predictive validity of psychopathy ratings depend on the clinical experience of the raters? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(2), 130–138. doi:10.1080/14999013.2016.1266421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, R. (2002). Effects of experience and training on diagnostic accuracy. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 110–113. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2006). Strutured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12(3), 321–336. doi:10.1080/10683160600569029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J.F., Campbell, J.S., & Weir, J.M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31(1), 53–75. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9019-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forth, A.E., Kosson, D.S., & Hare, R.D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL-YVTM) Technical Manual, Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health System
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H.N., & Boyle, P.A. (2014). Understanding why some clinicians use pseudoscientific methods: Findings from research on clinical judgment. In S.O. Lilienfeld, S. J., Lynn, and J. M. Lohr (Eds.). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 19–41). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L.S., Edens, J.F., Anthony, C., & Douglas, K.S. (2005). Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1056–1064. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revise manual (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health System.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P.B., Boccaccini, M.T., & Murrie, D.C. (2015). Rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 321–331. doi:10.1037/lhb0000115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S.D., Cox, D.N., & Hare, R.D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Heath Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, S.M., Boccaccini, M.T., & Murrie, D.C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the psychopathy checklist-revised. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 233–243. doi:10.1037/a0030391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, E., & Lee, S. (2008). Korean Edition of Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Professional Guidebook (2nd ed.). Seoul, Korea: Hakjisa Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Jo, E. (2005). Development of a risk assessment tool for juvenile at police investigation. Journal of Korean Social and Personality Psychology, 19, 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Leistico, A.M., Salekin, R.T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32(1), 28–45. doi:10.1007/sl10979-007-9096-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., … Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The macarthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murrie, D.C., Boccaccini, M.T., Caperton, J.D., & Rufino, K.A. (2012). Field validity of the psychopathy checklist-revised in sex offender risk assessment. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 524–529. doi:10.1037/a0026015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F., Campbell, M.A., & Houlding, C. (2011). Comparative analyses of the YLS.CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in adolescent offenders: A 10 year follow-up into adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(1), 23–42. doi:10.1177/1541204010371793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F.L., Oh, I.S., & Le, H. (2006). Increasing the accuracy of corrections for range restriction: Implications for selection procedure validities and other research results. Personnel Psychology, 59(2), 281–305. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler, P.M., & Pilipis, L.A. (2015). A comprehensive meta-reanalysis of the robustness of the experience-accuracy effect in clinical judgment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62 (3), 360–378. doi:10.1177/cou0000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale, K.C., Olver, M.E., & Wong, S.C.P. (2010). The psychopathy checklist: Youth version and adolescent and adult recidivism: Considerations with respect to gender, ethnicity, and age. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 768–781. doi:10.1037/a0020044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, A.R., Holley, S.R., Leary, M., & McNiel, D.E. (2012). The relationship between level of training and accuracy of violence risk assessment. Psychiatric Services, 63(11), 1089–1094. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201200019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J.L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G.M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17(3), 377–395. doi:10.1177/1073191109359587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S.C.P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction” A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar