References
- Appleby, S. C., Hasel, L. E., & Kassin, S. M. (2013). Police-induced confessions: An empirical analysis of their content and impact. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(2), 111–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.613389
- Appleby, S. C., & Kassin, S. M. (2016). When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 127–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000080
- Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 41, 258–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
- Billings, F. J., Taylor, T., Burns, J., Corey, D. L., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (2007). Can reinforcement induce children to falsely incriminate themselves? Law and Human Behavior, 31(2), 125–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9049-5
- Blandón-Gitlin, I., & Mindthoff, A. (2018). Do video recordings help jurors recognize coercive influences in interrogations? In C. J. Najdowski & M. C. Stevenson (Eds.), Criminal juries in the 21st century: Contemporary issues, psychological science, and the law (pp. 195–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Blandón-Gitlin, I., Sperry, K., & Leo, R. A. (2011). Jurors believe interrogation tactics are not likely to elicit false confessions: Will expert witness testimony inform them otherwise? Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(3), 239–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903113699
- Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 10(3), 214–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
- Bornstein, B. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022326807441
- Buck, J. A., London, K., & Wright, D. B. (2011). Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: Does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality? Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 152–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9228-2
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
- Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 7(2), 91–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.7.2.91
- Chojnacki, D. E., Cicchini, M. D., & White, L. T. (2008). An empirical basis for the admission of expert testimony on false confessions. Arizona State Law Journal, 40, 2–45.
- Cleary, H. M. D. (2017). Applying the lessons of developmental psychology to the study of juvenile interrogations: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(1), 118–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000120
- Cleary, H. M. D., & Warner, T. C. (2016). Police training in interviewing and interrogation methods: A comparison of techniques used with adult and juvenile suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 270–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000175
- Cleary, H. M., & Warner, T. C. (2017). Parents’ knowledge and attitudes about youths’ interrogation rights. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(8), 777–793. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1324030
- Costanzo, M., Shaked-Schroer, N., & Vinson, K. (2010). Juror beliefs about police interrogations, false confessions, and expert testimony. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(2), 231–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01177.x
- Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8(3), e57410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
- Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1004.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Feld, B. C. (2013). Real interrogation: What actually happens when cops question kids. Law & Society Review, 47(1), 1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12000
- Gawronski, B. (2004). Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: The fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 183–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000026
- Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
- Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L. O., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. L. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions . Assessment, 10(4), 359–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103259535
- Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. G. (Eds.). (2000). Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., … Schwartz, R. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024065015717
- Gross, S. R., & Schaffer, M. (2012). Exonerations in the United States, 1989–2012: Report by the National Registry of Exonerations. Retrieved from the University of Michigan Law School. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/other/92/
- Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2006). Custodial interrogation, false confession, and individual differences: A national study among Icelandic youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 49–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.012
- Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2009). Interrogation and false confessions among adolescents in seven European countries: What background and psychological variables best discriminate between false confessors and non-false confessors? Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(8), 711–728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802516257
- Haney-Caron, E., Goldstein, N. E. S., & Mesiarik, C. (2018). Self-perceived likelihood of false confession. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1955–1976. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818799806
- Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence? Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 638–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000204
- Henkel, L. A., Coffman, K. A. J., & Dailey, E. M. (2008). A survey of people’s attitudes and beliefs about false confessions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(5), 555–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.826
- Honts, C. R., Kassin, S. M., & Craig, R. A. (2014). I’d know a false confession if I saw one’: A constructive replication with juveniles. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(7), 695–704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.854792
- Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 10(2), 111–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111
- Horgan, A. J., Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Evans, J. R. (2012). Minimization and maximization techniques: Assessing the perceived consequences of confessing and confession diagnosticity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 65–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.561801
- Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2011). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
- Jones, A. M., & Penrod, S. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to coercive interrogation tactics? Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 16(5), 393–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029
- Kassin, S. M., Drizin, S. A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G. H., Leo, R. A., & Redlich, A. D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
- Kassin, S. M., Kukucka, J., Lawson, V. Z., & DeCarlo, J. (2014). Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 73–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000047
- Kassin, S. M., Kukucka, J., Lawson, V. Z., & DeCarlo, J. (2017). Police reports of mock suspect interrogations: A test of accuracy and perception. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 230–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000225
- Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., & Norwick, R. J. (2005). “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29(2), 211–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-2416-9
- Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the ‘fundamental difference’ hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
- Kassin, S. M., Redlich, A. D., Alceste, F., & Luke, T. J. (2018). On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. The American Psychologist, 73(1), 63–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000141
- Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the harmless error rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21(1), 27–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769
- Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 133–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00698.x
- Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11(6), 489–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00838.x
- Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (3rd ed., pp. 67–94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Kostelnik, J. O., & Reppucci, N. D. (2009). Reid training and sensitivity to developmental maturity in interrogation: Results from a national survey of police. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 361–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.871
- Laimon, R. L., & Poole, D. A. (2008). Adults usually believe young children: The influence of eliciting questions and suggestibility presentations on perceptions of children’s disclosures. Law and Human Behavior, 32(6), 489–501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9127-y
- Leippe, M. R., & Eisenstadt, D. (2009). The influence of eyewitness expert testimony on jurors’ beliefs and judgments. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Expert testimony on the psychology of eyewitness identification (pp. 169–200). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Leo, R. A., & Liu, B. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 381–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872
- Madon, S., Guyll, M., Scherr, K. C., Greathouse, S., & Wells, G. L. (2012). Temporal discounting: The differential effect of proximal and distal consequences on confession decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 13–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093962
- Malloy, L. C., Shulman, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2014). Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 181–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000065
- Medford, S., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Pearse, J. (2003). The efficacy of the appropriate adult safeguard during police interviewing. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8(2), 253–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/135532503322363022
- Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
- Meyer, J. R., & Reppucci, N. D. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(6), 757–780. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.774
- Mindthoff, A., Evans, J. R., Perez, G., Woestehoff, S. A., Olaguez, A. P., Klemfuss, J. Z., … Woody, W. D. (2018). A survey of potential jurors’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 430–448. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000182
- Moffa, S. M., & Platania, J. (2007). Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions. Psychological Reports, 100(2), 563–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.2.563-570
- Molinaro, P. F., & Malloy, L. C. (2016). Statements from youth in legal contexts: Effects of consistency, legal role, and age. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(1), 139–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2236
- Najdowski, C. J., & Bottoms, B. L. (2012). Understanding jurors’ judgements in cases involving juvenile defendants: Effects of confession evidence and intellectual disability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), 297–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025786
- Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors’ perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 401–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.873
- Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N. D., & Meyer, J. D. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. The American Psychologist, 61(4), 286–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.286
- Pezdek, K., Avila-Mora, E., & Sperry, K. (2009). Does trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(5), 673–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1578
- Pimentel, P. S., Arndorfer, A., & Malloy, L. C. (2015). Taking the blame for someone else's wrongdoing: The effects of age and reciprocity. Law and Human Behavior, 39(3), 219–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000132
- Ramsey, S. R., Thompson, K. L., McKenzie, M., & Rosenbaum, A. (2016). Psychological research in the internet age: The quality of web-based data. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 354–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.049
- Redlich, A. D., Ghetti, S., & Quas, J. A. (2008). Perceptions of children during a police interview: A comparison of alleged victims and suspects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(3), 705–735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00323.x
- Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 141–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022543012851
- Redlich, A. D., Quas, J. A., & Ghetti, S. (2008). Perceptions of children during a police interrogation: Guilt, confessions, and interview fairness. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 14(3), 201–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00323.x
- Redlich, A. D., Silverman, M., Chen, J., & Steiner, H. (2004). The police interrogation of children and adolescents. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 107–125). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174–221.
- Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511–586.
- Simon, D. (2012). In doubt: The psychology of the criminal justice process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Steinberg, L., & Scott, E. S. (2003). Less guilty by reason of adolescence: Developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty. The American Psychologist, 58(12), 1009–1018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1009
- Stewart, J. M., Woody, W. D., & Pulos, S. (2018). The prevalence of false confessions in experimental laboratory simulations: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(1), 12–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2327
- The Justice Project. (2007). Electronic recording of custodial interrogations: A policy review. Washington, DC: Author.
- Viljoen, J. L., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29(3), 253–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2
- Wallace, D. B., & Kassin, S. M. (2012). Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors? Law and Human Behavior, 36(2), 151–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093975
- Whelan, R., & McHugh, L. A. (2009). Temporal discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards by adolescents, adults, and older adults. The Psychological Record, 59(2), 247–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395661
- Woestehoff, S. A., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 564–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000201
- Woody, W. D., & Forrest, K. D. (2009). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors’ verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 333–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.865
- Woody, W. D., Stewart, J. M., Forrest, K. D., Camacho, L. J., Woestehoff, S. A., Provenza, K. R., … Powner, S. J. (2018). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1528744. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744
- Woolard, J. L., Cleary, H. M., Harvell, S. A., & Chen, R. (2008). Examining adolescents’ and their parents’ conceptual and practical knowledge of police interrogation: A family dyad approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 685–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9288-5