References
- Australian Institute of Criminology. (2003). Crime stoppers: Evaluating Victoria’s Program (Report No. 272). Retrieved from https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi272
- Chabris, C.F., Weinberger, A., Fontaine, M., & Simons, D.J. (2011). You do not talk about Fight Club if you do not notice Fight Club: Inattentional blindness for a simulated real-world assault. i-Perception, 2(2), 150–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/i0436
- Crime Stoppers Australia (2018). Corporate plan. Retrieved from https://www.crimestoppers.com.au/sites/default/files/2018-05/CSA1002.pdf
- Crime Stoppers Queensland (2014). History. Retrieved from https://www.crimestoppersqld.com.au/discover/history.jsp#.XDMdI88zZE4
- Davies, G., & Milne, A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production: A function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(2), 209–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012002004
- Deffenbacher, K.A., Bornstein, B.H., Penrod, S.D., & McGorty, E.K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x
- Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 770–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193073
- Frenda, S.J., Nichols, R.M., & Loftus, E.F. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 20–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396620
- Gresham, P.J., Stockdale, J., & Bartholomew, I. (2003). Evaluating the impact of Crimestoppers (Home Office Report 22/03). London.
- Greene, E., Flynn, M.S., & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 207–219. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90571-0
- Harkness, E.L., Paterson, H.M., Denson, T., Kemp, R.I., Mullan, B., & Sainsbury, K. (2015). Can ego depletion and post-event discussion change the way we remember a crime? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 172–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.924384
- Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M.E., Sternberg, K.J., & Horowitz, D. (2002). A comparison of mental and physical context reinstatement in forensic interviews with alleged victims of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(4), 429–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.804
- Innocence Project, New York, United States. (2015). The causes of wrongful conviction. Retrieved from http://innocenceproject.org/causes-wrongful-conviction
- James, K. (1986). Priming and social categorization factors: Impact on awareness of emergency situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(4), 462–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167286124009
- Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3
- Kebbell, M.R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600384
- Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 58–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.58
- Lane, S.M. (2006). Dividing attention during a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 199–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1177
- Leippe, M.R., Wells, G.L., & Ostrom, T.M. (1978). Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(3), 345–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.3.345
- Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Eyewitness suggestibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 86–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770942
- Loftus, E.F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12(4), 361–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
- Lurigio, A.J., & Rosenbaum, D.P. (1991). The effects of mass media on crime prevention awareness, attitudes, and behaviour: The case of crime stoppers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(2), 82–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885621
- Migueles, M., & García-Bajos, E. (1999). Recall, recognition, and confidence patterns in eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 257–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199906)13:3<257::AID-ACP566>3.0.CO;2-7
- Monds, L.A., Paterson, H.M., & Whittle, K. (2013). Can warnings decrease the misinformation effect in post-event debriefing?. International Journal of Emergency Services, 2(1), 49–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-06-2012-0025
- Morgan, C.A., Southwick, S., Steffian, G., Hazlett, G.A., & Loftus, E.F. (2013). Misinformation can influence memory for recently experienced, highly stressful events. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 11–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.11.002
- Nelson, K.J., Laney, C., Bowman Fowler, N., Knowles, E.D., Davis, D., & Loftus, E.F. (2011). Change blindness can cause mistaken eyewitness identification. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(1), 62–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X482625
- Paterson, H.M., & Kemp, R.I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1083–1099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1261
- Paterson, H.M., Kemp, R.I., & Ng, J. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1640
- Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (1995). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60(1), 116–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1034
- Pfuhl, E.H. Jr. (1992). Crimestoppers: The legitimisation of snitching. Justice Quarterly, 9(3), 505–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829200091501
- Rivardo, M.G., Brown, K.A., Rodgers, A.D., Maurer, S.V., Camaione, T.C., Minjock, R.M., & Gowen, G.M. (2011). Integrating inattentional blindness and eyewitness memory. North American Journal of Psychology, 13, 519–538.
- Rosenbaum, D.P., Lurigio, A.J., & Lavrakas, P.J. (1989). Enhancing citizen participation and solving serious crime: A national evaluation of Crime Stoppers programs. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 401–420.
- Sharps, M.J., Herrera, M.R., & Price-Sharps, J.L. (2014). Situationally equivocal eyewitness evidence and the violence of crimes. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 11(1), 81–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1398
- Simons, D.J., & Chabris, C.F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained Inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/p2952
- Smith, S.M., & Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 125–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060204
- Spielberger, C.D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt, A., & Van Koppen, P.J. (2016). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory (Hove, England), 24(5), 669–682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1042884
- Wright, D.B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 189–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161781
- Wright, D.B., & Stroud, J.N. (1998). Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(2), 273–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00366.x
- Yarmey, A.D., & Kent, J. (1980). Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law and Human Behavior, 4(4), 359–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040627