Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts

References

• Acklin, M. W. (2007). The Rorschach test and forensic psychological evaluations: Psychosis and the insanity defense. In C. B. Gacono & F. B. Evans (Eds.), The handbook of forensic Rorschach assessment (pp. 157–174). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Acklin, M. W., McDowell, C. J., Verschell, M. S., & Chan, D. (2000). Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach comprehensive system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(1), 15–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa740103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, S., Fox, H. M., & Kahn, M. W. (1980). Faking psychosis on the Rorschach: Can expert judges detect malingering? Journal of Personality Assessment, 44(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4402_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A. (2013). Ethics in correctional and forensic psychology: Getting the balance right. Australian Psychologist, 48(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A. (2018). Moral challenges for psychologists working in psychology and law. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 25(3), 485–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1473173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A. (2020). Structuring the debate about research ethics in the psychology and law field: An international perspective. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1742243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A., Dawson, D., & Allan, M. M. (2006). Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 41(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060500391886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A., Parry, C. L., Ferrante, A., Gillies, C., Griffiths, C. S., Morgan, F., Smallbone, S. W., Tubex, T., Spiranovic, C., & Wong, S. C. P. (2019). Assessing the risk of Australian Indigenous sexual offenders reoffending: A review of the research literature and court decisions. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 26(2), 274–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1504242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (1998). Awards for distinguished professional contributions: John E. Exner, Jr. American Psychologist, 53(4), 391–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.53.4.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2009). Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on appropriate therapeutic responses to sexual orientation. http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/therapeutic-resp.html
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., Siegel, E., White, D., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Out of sight but not out of mind: Unseen affective faces influence evaluations and social impressions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12(6), 1210–1221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., Bozic, S., Little, J., & Lievens, F. (2018). Response distortion on personality tests in applicants: Comparing high-stakes to low-stakes medical settings. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dpcx6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Vauter Stredny, R., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Wheeler, E. M. A., & Vauter, R. A. (2016). Empirically supported forensic assessment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(4), 348–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areh, I. (2020). Forensic assessment may be based on common sense assumptions rather than science. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. (2013). Ethical guidelines for psychological practice in forensic contexts. APS. https://www.psychology.org.au/for-members/resource-finder/resources/ethics/Ethical-guidelines-psychological-practice-forensic.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. (2014). Ethical guidelines for psychological assessment and the use of psychological tests. APS. https://www.psychology.org.au/for-members/resource-finder/resources/ethics/
   Google Scholar
• Barchard, K. A., Grob, K. E., & Roe, M. J. (2017). Is sadness blue? The problem of using figurative language for emotions on psychological tests. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0713-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartell, S. S., & Solanto, M. V. (1995). Usefulness of the Rorschach inkblot test in assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80(2), 531–541. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1995.80.2.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, D. M., Pinsk, M. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Symmetry perception in humans and macaques. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 405–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. J. (1937). Some present Rorschach problems. Rorschach Research Exchange, 2(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08934037.1937.10381217
   Google Scholar
• Beecher-Monas, E. (1998). Blinded by science: How judges avoid the science in scientific evidence. Temple Law Review, 71, 55–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. & Masling, J. M. (Eds.) (2005). Scoring the Rorschach: Seven validated systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bow, J. N., Gould, J. W., Flens, J. R., & Greenhut, D. (2006). Testing in child custody evaluations –selection, usage, and Daubert admissibility: A survey of psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6(2), 17–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v06n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (1992). The definition of a profession: The authority of metaphor in the history of intelligence testing, 1890–1930. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. R., Kula, M. L., & St. Laurent, C. M. (1997). Rorschach revised DEPI and GDI with inpatient major depressives and borderline personality disorder with major depression: Validity issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199701)53:1%3C51::aid-jclp7%3E3.0.co;2-y https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199701)53:1<51::AID-JCLP7>3.0.CO;2-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, A., & Roach, J. (2016). Fraudulently claiming following a road traffic accident: A pilot study of UK residents’ attitudes. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1080148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, A., Roach, J., & Armitage, R. (2019). Mission impossible? Assessing the veracity of a mental health problem as result of a road traffic accident: A preliminary review of UK experts’ practices. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 30(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2018.1502338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerney, M. S. (1990). The Rorschach and traumatic loss: Can the presence of traumatic loss be detected from the Rorschach? Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 781–789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, G., & Norris, D. M. (2011). Child custody and parental fitness. In E. Y. Drogin, F. M Dattilio, R. L. Sadoff, & T. G. Gutheil (Eds.), Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives (pp. 433–458). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118093399
   Google Scholar
• Costello, R. M. (1998). Psychometric definition of Rorschach determinant component structure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 14(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.14.2.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579. (1993). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/509/579/
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, R. M. (1996). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delavari, M., Shairi, M., & Asghari-Moghadam, M. (2013). Role of culture and gender in Rorschach findings in 9 year old Iranian children. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1565–1570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.789
   Google Scholar
• Dimsdale, J. E. (2015). Use of Rorschach tests at the Nuremberg war crimes trial: A forgotten chapter in history of medicine. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6), 515–518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1989). Implicit memory: Task or process? In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 17–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Edmond, G. (2012). Is reliability sufficient? The Law Commission and expert evidence in international and interdisciplinary perspective (Part 1). International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 16(1), 30–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.391
   Google Scholar
• Elhai, J. D., Kinder, B. N., & Frueh, B. C. (2004). Projective assessment of malingering. In M. J. Hilsenroth, D. L. Segal, & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Volume 2: Personality Assessment (pp. 553–561). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, S. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Vitacco, M. J. (2007). Failing the burden of proof: The science and ethics of projective tests in custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 45(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00138.x
   Google Scholar
• European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. (2005). Meta-code of ethics. http://www.efpa.eu/ethics/ethical-codes
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (1969). The Rorschach systems. Grune and Statton.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (1974). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (1995). Issues and methods in Rorschach research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (2000). A primer for Rorschach interpretation. Rorschach Workshops.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 1) (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, J. E. (2008). A Rorschach workbook for the Comprehensive System (5th ed). Rorschach Workshops.
   Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. L. (1995). The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it ‘scientific,’ ‘technical,’ or ‘other’ knowledge? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(4), 960–979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J., & Heene, M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science’s aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, N., & Venturi, D. (2018). Testing the untestable: The CJEU’s decision in Case C-473/16, F v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal (June 28, 2018). European Database of Asylum Law. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3204321.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, S. E. (1996). Assessment feedback integrating MMPI-2 and Rorschach findings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Cho Paik, M. (2003). Statistical methods for rates & proportions (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fontan, P., & Andronikof, A. (2017). Complexity, pseudoscience and Rorschach performance assessment system. Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-2701.1000145
   Google Scholar
• Frank, G. (1994). Socioeconomic status and the Rorschach. Psychological Reports, 74(1), 95–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr074.1.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckelton, I. (2019). Expert evidence: Law, practice, procedure and advocacy. Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1911). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). In Standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, J. Strachey, Trans., pp. 9–79). Hogarth.
   Google Scholar
• Frueh, B. C., & Kinder, B. N. (1994). The susceptibility of the Rorschach inkblot test to malingering of combat-related PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62(2), 280–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye v. United States 293 F 1013 (DC Cir) (1923).
   Google Scholar
• F v. Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal [F v. Hungary]. (2018). CJEU Case C-473/416. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=198766&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=865294
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach inkblot test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6(4), 313–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., Florio, C. M., & Grove, W. M. (1998). The validity of the Rorschach and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Results from meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 9(5), 402–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2016). Psychological assessment and clinical judgment. In J. E. Maddux & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Psychopathology: Foundations for a contemporary understanding (4th ed., pp. 111–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Fowler, K. A. (2020). Psychological assessment and clinical judgment. In J. E. Maddux & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Psychopathology: Foundations for a contemporary understanding (5th ed., pp. 125–140). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2005). Roots of the Rorschach controversy. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2003). The Rorschach inkblot test, fortune tellers, and cold reading. Skeptical Inquirer, 27(4), 29–34. https://skepticalinquirer.org/2003/07/the-rorschach-inkblot-test-fortune-tellers-and-cold-reading/
   Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., & Cauda, F. (2017). Neural activity during production of Rorschach responses: An fMRI study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 262, 25–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E. (2001, February 20). What’s in an inkblot? Some say, not much. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/20/science/what-s-in-an-inkblot-some-say-not-much.html
   Google Scholar
• Gould, A. (2019, 4 June). The gay test: Medicalisation and queer asylum seekers. EMA Human Rights Blog. http://www.emahumanrights.org/2019/06/04/the-gay-test-medicalisation-and-queer-asylum-seekers/
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W., Martindale, D. A., & Flens, J. R. (2013). Responsible use of psychological tests: Ethical and professional practice concerns. In D. H. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. Schwean (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Child Psychological Assessment (pp. 222–237). Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199796304.013.0011
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, L., Wasyliw, O., Benn, A., & Gyoerkoe, K. (2002). Can sex offenders who minimize on the MMPI conceal psychopathology on the Rorschach? Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(3), 484–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7803_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnera, L. A., Murrie, D. C., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Why do forensic experts disagree? Sources of unreliability and bias in forensic psychology evaluations. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000114
   Google Scholar
• Gurley, J. R. (2017). Essentials of Rorschach assessment: Comprehensive system and R-PAS. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, M., Shaffer, T. W., & Erdberg, P. (2000). A study of nonpatient preadolescent Rorschach protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75(2), 280–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, M. (1976). Rorschach records of the Nazi war criminals: An experimental study after thirty years. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40(4), 341–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4004_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, E., & Hartmann, T. (2014). The impact of exposure to Internet-based information about the Rorschach and the MMPI-2 on psychiatric outpatients’ ability to simulate mentally healthy test performance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 432–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.882342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., & Lench, H. C. (2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 456–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 16(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2000) ‘The scientific status of projective techniques’. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huberty, T. (2019). Depression. In S. Hupp (Ed.), Pseudoscience in child and adolescent psychotherapy: A skeptical field guide (pp. 124–139). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316798096.011
   Google Scholar
• Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. M. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 266–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Whither the Rorschach? An analysis of the evidence. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 472–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsley, J., Lee, C. M., Wood, J. M., & Taylor, W. (2015). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In S. O. Lilienfeld, S. Y. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (pp. 42–82). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupka, R. B., Zaleski, Z., Otto, J., Reidl, L., & Tarabrina, N. V. (1997). The colours of anger, envy, fear, and jealousy: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022197282002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2013). International guidelines for test use. International Test Commission. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_use.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iudici, A., Salvini, A., Faccio, E., & Castelnuovo, G. (2015). The clinical assessment in the legal field: An empirical study of bias and limitations in forensic expertise. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1831. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kingery, L. R. (2003). The psychological correlates of asymmetric cerebral activation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maine]. Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 54. University of Maine, Department of Psychology. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/54/
   Google Scholar
• Kleckner, I. R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W. K., Quigley, K. S., Dickerson, B. C., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2017). Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(5), 0069. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, R., Archer, R. P., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2011). The Rorschach and performance-based assessment. In T. M. Harwood, L. E. Beutler, & G. Groth-Marnat (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (3rd ed., pp. 276–328). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, R., Archer, R. P., & House, J. J. (1996). The MMPI-A and Rorschach: A failure to establish convergent validity. Assessment, 3(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119600300210
   Google Scholar
• Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael 566 US 137. (1999). https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/97-1709P.ZS
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, F., & Labott, S. M. (1996). Authenticity of recovered sexual abuse memories: A Rorschach study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 483–496. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Reynolds, C. R., & Willson, V. L. (2003). Standardized test administration. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 3(3), 55–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v03n03_04
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015). Introduction to Special Section on Pseudoscience in Psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(12), 531–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371506001202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2001). What’s wrong with this picture? Scientific American, 284(5), 80–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lis, A., Parolin, L., Calvo, V., Zennaro, A., & Meyer, G. (2007). The impact of administration and inquiry on Rorschach Comprehensive System protocols in a national reference sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(sup1), S193–S200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701583614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, S. N., Myrtek, M., & Peper, M. (2013). Mood-congruent memory in daily life: Evidence from interactive ambulatory monitoring. Biological Psychology, 93(2), 308–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2004). Memories of things unseen. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 145–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B. (1995). A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 13(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370130205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M., Allan, A., & Allan, M. M. (2001). The use of psychological tests by Australian psychologists who do assessments for the courts. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530108255127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlin, M. W. (2012). Pollyanna principle. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (pp. 255–272). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matt, G. E., Vázquez, C., & Campbell, W. K. (1992). Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 12(2), 227–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(92)90116-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, J. T., & Evans, F. B. (2008). Admissibility of the Rorschach. In C. B. Gacono, F. B. Evans, N. Kaser-Boyd, & L.A. Gacono (Eds.), The handbook of forensic Rorschach assessment (pp. 55–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meisner, J. S. (1984). Susceptibility of Rorschach depression correlates to malingering [Doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3951B. Alliant International University, The California School of Professional Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B., Pertrila, J., Poythress, N. G., Slobogin, C., Otto, R. K., Mossman, D., & Condie, L. O. (2018). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J. (1997). Assessing reliability: Critical corrections for a critical examination of the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Psychological Assessment, 9(4), 480–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.9.4.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J. (2017). What Rorschach performance can add to assessing and understanding personality. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 3(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/https://ijpp.rug.nl/article/view/29881
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. W. (2007). Towards international normative reference data for Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89(sup1), S201–S216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701629342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Reese, J. B., & Mihura, J. L. (2015). The association of gender, ethnicity, age, and education with Rorschach scores. Assessment, 22(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114544358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., & Mihura, J. L. (2017). Psychometric foundations of the Rorscach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS). In R. E. Erard & F. B. Evans (Eds.), The Rorschach in multimethod forensic assessment: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 23–91). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Bombel, G., & Dumitrascu, N. (2015). Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: Reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015). Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 250–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 548–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029406 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2006). Projective assessment and school psychology: Contemporary validity issues and implications for practice. The California School Psychologist, 11(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341117
   Google Scholar
• Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustac v. Medical Board of Western Australia. (2007). WASCA 156. http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/supreme/supdcsn.nsf/judgment.xsp?documentId=35E998F6467030A248256EDF000D50B7&action=openDocument
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. https://www.ncme.org/publications/testing-standards
   Google Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., Slobogin, C., Saks, M. J., Faigman, D. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2019). Psychological assessments in legal contexts: Are courts keeping ‘junk science’ out of the courtroom? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(3), 135–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619888860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørbech, P. C. B., Fodstad, L., Kuisma, I., Lunde, K. B., & Hartmann, E. (2016). Incarcerated violent offenders’ ability to avoid revealing their potential for violence on the Rorschach and the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1129613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. C. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Patihis, L., Merckelbach, H., Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2019). The return of the repressed: The persistent and problematic claims of long-forgotten trauma. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1072–1095. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619862306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Seth, A. K., & Pinto, Y. (2017). A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and Cognition, 112, 69–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, M. N. (1984). An examination of naïve and role informed faking in Rorschach performance [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45683B.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. (1983). A meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(3), 227–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4703_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. C., Hanson, R. K., & Hunsley, J. (1988). MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A meta-analytic comparison of reliability, stability, and validity. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson, K. L., Straus, E., Bull, D. M., MacArthur, S. K., DeLorme, J., & Dalenberg, C. J. (2019). Knowledge and views of psychological tests among psychiatrists and psychologists. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 19(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2018.1546071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, G. G., & Kinder, B. N. (1990). The susceptibility of the Rorschach to malingering: A critical review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54(1–2), 47–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5401&2_5 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9673972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, W., McDougall, A., & Viglione, D. (1995). A five-year follow-up on the temporal stability of the Ego Impairment Index. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, Z. A. (1980). CPR: The psychological X-ray in mental disorders. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 85–108). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (5th ed.). Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Post, M. W. (2016). What to do with ‘moderate’ reliability and validity coefficients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(7), 1051–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pownall & Ors v Conlan Management Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Kalbarri Trust. (1995). WASC 117. https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WASC/1995/117.pdf
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2016). Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods. http://scipol.duke.edu/content/forensic-science-criminal-courts-ensuring-scientific-validity-feature-comparison-methods
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. R., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorschach, H. (1921/1951). Psychodiagnostics (5th ed.). Hans Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ruscio, J. (2000). The role of complex thought in clinical prediction: Social accountability and the need for cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R v Turner. (1975). 1 All ER 70.
   Google Scholar
• Schott, G. D. (2014). Revisiting the Rorschach ink-blots: From iconography and psychology to neuroscience. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 85(6), 699–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, D. S., & Brabender, V. M. (2013). More challenges since Wikipedia: The effects of exposure to Internet information about the Rorschach on selected Comprehensive System variables. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, D. S., & Loving, J. L. (2012). Challenges since Wikipedia: The availability of Rorschach information online and Internet users’ reactions to online media coverage of the Rorschach-Wikipedia debate. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz, F. C., Andersen, D. O., & Braucht, G. N. (1974). A comparative analysis of Rorschach signs of homosexuality. Psychological Reports, 35(3), 1163–1169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1974.35.3.1163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, K. W., & Helle, A. C. (2018). Dissimulation on projective measures: An updated appraisal of a very old question. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 301–313). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. T., Seth, A. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). Predictions shape confidence in right inferior frontal gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(40), 10323–10336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1092-16.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siipola, E., & Taylor, V. (1952). Reactions to ink blots under free and pressure conditions. Journal of Personality, 21(1), 22–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1952.tb01857.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, G., & Grann, M. (2002). Risk assessment: What is being predicted by actuarial prediction instruments? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2002.10471172
   Google Scholar
• Stenius, J., Lindfors, O., Antikainen, R., Wahlström, J., Sares-Jäske, L., & Knekt, P. (2018). Associations between the Rorschach Ego Impairment Index and measures on intrapsychic and interpersonal functioning. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2018.81001
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. E., & Chambless, D. L. (2007). Does psychotherapy research inform treatment decisions in private practice? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(3), 267–281. https:// https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyerberg, E. W. (2009). Clinical prediction models: A practical approach to development, validation, and updating. (Vol. 1). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan, S., Andronikof, A., Réveillère, C., & Lemmel, G. (2006). A Rorschach stability study in a nonpatient adult sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, N. D. (1977). Assessment of persons. Prentice Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Szmukler, G., Everitt, B., & Leese, M. (2012). Editorial: Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 895–898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329171100208X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham, D. S. Y., Sowden, P. T., Grandison, A., Franklin, A., Lee, A. K. W., Ng, M., Park, J., Pang, W., & Zhao, J. (2020). A systematic investigation of conceptual color associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(7), 1311–1332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States v. Hall. (1996). 93 F.3d 1337, 1342-43, 7th Cir. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/591482b4add7b0493449ab87#
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2016). The effects of using the international versus Comprehensive System Rorschach norms for children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1136313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17(3), 377–395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191109359587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B. (2003). Principles of Rorschach interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B. (2014). Principles of Rorschach interpretation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B., Exner, J. E., & Sciara, A. (1996). Is the Rorschach welcome in the courtroom? Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(2), 422–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, I. B., & Greene, R. L. (2007). Handbook of personality assessment. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• What’s behind the Rorschach inkblot test? (2012, July 25). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18952667
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2021, April 16). Rorschach test. Retrieved January 28, 2021. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2020, February). Controversial psychology tests are often still used in US courts. New Scientist, 3270. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2233956-controversial-psychology-tests-are-often-still-used-in-us-courts/
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Duke, M. C. (2015). A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: Comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 236–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., Garb, H. N., & Nezworski, M. T. (2000). The Rorschach test in clinical diagnosis: A critical review, with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 395–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200003)56:3<395::AID-JCLP15>3.0.CO;2-O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Garb, H. N. (2008). The Rorschach inkblot test, fortune tellers, and cold reading. In S. O. Lilienfeld, J. Ruscio, & S. J. Lynn (Eds.), Navigating the mindfield: A user’s guide to distinguishing science from pseudoscience in mental health (pp. 145–157). Prometheus Books/Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., & Stejskal, W. J. (1996). The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00658.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Stejskal, W. J., & McKinzey, R. K. (2001). Problems of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach in forensic settings: Recent developments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(3), 93–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v01n03_06
   Google Scholar