Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions

References

• Ali, A., Ghosh, S., Strydom, A., & Hassiotis, A. (2016). Prisoners with intellectual disabilities and detention status. Findings from a UK cross sectional study of prisons. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 53–54, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., & Galloway, S. (2016). Developing a screening tool for offenders with intellectual disabilities – the RAPID. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 7(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-01-2015-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allely, C. S. (2016). Autism spectrum disorders in the criminal justice system: police interviewing, the courtroom and the prison environment. In Recent advances in autism (pp. 1–13). SM Group.
   Google Scholar
• Allely, C. S. (2020). Autism spectrum disorder in the courtroom: Perceptions and understanding of defendants with autism by judges and jurors. In Elizabeth Kelley (Ed.), Representing people with autism spectrum disorders: A practical guide for criminal defense lawyers. American Bar Association (ABA) Book Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Allely, C. S., & Cooper, P. (2017). Jurors’ and judges’ evaluation of defendants with autism and the impact on sentencing: A systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) review of autism spectrum disorder in the courtroom. Journal of Law and Medicine, 25(1), 105–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, N., & Hurley, E. A. (2013). A justice system failing the autistic community. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 4(1/2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-02-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake, A., Gooding, P., Andrews, L., & McSherry, B. (2017). Human rights and unfitness to plead: The demands of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Human Rights Law Review, 17(3), 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroff, G. S., Gunn, M., & Hayes, S. (2004). Legal issues. In W. R. Lindsay, J. L. Taylor, & P. Sturmey (Eds.), Offenders with developmental disabilities. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Berryessa, C. M. (2014). Judiciary views on criminal behaviour and intention of offenders with high-functioning autism. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 5(2), 97–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berryessa, C. M. (2016). Brief report: Judicial attitudes regarding the sentencing of offenders with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(8), 2770–2773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2798-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braatveit, K. J., Torsheim, T., & Hove, O. (2018). Screening for intellectual disabilities: A validation of the Hayes Ability Screening Index for in-patients with substance use disorder. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 72(5), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2018.1468923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredal, A., & Stefansen, K. (2017). Barnahus for adults? Reinterpreting the barnahus model to accommodate adult victims of domestic violence. In Collaborating against child abuse: Exploring the Nordic Barnahus Model (pp. 311–330). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58388-4_15
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2019a). Modernising fitness to plead. Medicine, Science, and the Law, 59(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419863937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. (2019b). Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: Historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law, 59(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419856761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, E., McCarthy, J., & Forrester, A. (2017). Defendants with autism spectrum disorders: What is the role of court liaison and diversion? Advances in Autism, 3(4), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIA-08-2017-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, V. (2018). People with intellectual and developmental disorders in the United Kingdom criminal justice system. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry: Official Journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists = Dong Ya jing shen ke xue zhi: Xianggang jing shen ke yi xue yuan qi kan, 28(4), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.12809/caap1844
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Allely, C. (2017). You can’t judge a book by its cover: Evolving professional responsibilities, liabilities and judgecraft when a party has Asperger’s Syndrome. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v68i1.21
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., & Mattison, M. (2017). Intermediaries, vulnerable people and the quality of evidence: An international comparison of three versions of the English intermediary model. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 21(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712717725534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights (2019). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a fair trial (civil limb). https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_6_ENG.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, N. C. (2018). Rett forstått? - Politiets erfaringer fra avhør av mennesker med utviklingshemming. NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M. (1843). UKHL J16, 8 ER 718. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1843/J16.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2009). The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Esan, F., Chester, V., Gunaratna, I., Hoare, S., & Alexander, R. (2015). The clinical, forensic and treatment outcome factors of patients with autism spectrum disorder treated in a forensic intellectual disability service. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 28(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., & Seewald, K. (2012). Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 200(5), 364–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, A., & Hopkin, G. (2019). Mental health in the criminal justice system: A pathways approach to service and research design. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health : CBMH, 29(4), 207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, A., Hopkin, G., Bryant, L., Slade, K., & Samele, C. (2020). Alternatives to custodial remand for women in the criminal justice system: A multi‐sector approach. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: CBMH, 30(2-–3), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, N. (2020). To what extent should expert psychiatric witnesses comment on criminal culpability? Medicine, Science, and the Law, 60(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802419872844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C. (1997). Prevalence of intellectual disability in local courts. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 22(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259700033311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C. (2000). Hayes Ability Screening Index (HASI) manual. Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C. (2015). Hayes Ability Screening Index (HASI-NV) Manual. HASI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hellenbach, M. (2012). Learning disabilities and criminal justice: Custody sergeants’ perceptions of alleged offenders with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2011.00677.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenbach, M., Karatzias, T., & Brown, M. (2017). Intellectual disabilities among prisoners: Prevalence and mental and physical health comorbidities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 30(2), 230–241. March 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helverschou, S. B., Søndenaa, E., Steindal, K., Rasmussen, K., Nilsson, B., & Nøttestad, J. A. (2014). Rettspsykiatrisk undersøkte med autismespekterdiagnoser: Alder ved identifisering og diagnostisk historie. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 51(4), 282–285. https://psykologtidsskriftet.no/fagbulletin/2014/04/rettspsykiatrisk-undersokte-med-autismespekterdiagnoser-alder-ved-identifisering
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, M., & Thomas, S. (2012). Police encounters with people with intellectual disability: prevalence, characteristics and challenges. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : JIDR, 56(6), 620–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, V. (2009). Assessing the prevalence of intellectual disability among young male prisoners. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : JIDR, 53(5), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01150.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, D. V. (2006). Court diversion in perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(6–7), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01835.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G., & Talbot, J. (2010). No one knows: the bewildering passage of offenders with learning disability and learning difficulty through the criminal justice system. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: CBMH, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerace, M. (2010). Fitness to be tried. https://www.publicdefenders.nsw.gov.au/Pages/public_defenders_research/Papers by Public Defenders/public_defenders_fitness_ierace.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Magistrates Court of Western Australia (Producer) (2019). Intellectual disability diversion program court. Magistrates Court of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, K. L., Crane, L., Mulcahy, S., Hawken, T., Cooper, P., Wurtzel, D., & Memon, A. (2017). Brief report: Autism in the courtroom: Experiences of legal professionals and the autism community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(8), 2610–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall-Tate, K., Chaplin, E., McCarthy, J., & Grealish, A. (2020). A literature review about the prevalence and identification of people with an intellectual disability within Court Liaison and Diversion Services. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 11(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-10-2019-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Chaplin, E., Forrester, A., Underwood, L., Hayward, H., Sabet, J., Young, S., Mills, R., Asherson, P., & Murphy, D. (2019). Prisoners with neurodevelopmental difficulties: Vulnerabilities for mental illness and self-harm. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: CBMH, 29(5-6), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Chaplin, E., Underwood, L., Forrester, A., Hayward, H., Sabet, J., Young, S., Asherson, P., Mills, R., & Murphy, D. (2016). Characteristics of prisoners with neurodevelopmental disorders and difficulties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research : JIDR, 60(3), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Underwood, L., Chaplin, E., Hayward, H., Mills, R., & Murphy, D. (2016). Screening for autism spectrum disorder in prison. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, K., Michie, A., Murray, A., & Hales, C. (2012). Screening for offenders with an intellectual disability: The validity of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(3), 791–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckinnon, I., Thorp, J., & Grubin, D. (2015). Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-04-2015-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, C. (2018, October). Offenders with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system [Paper presentation]. 5th Bergen International Conference on Forensic Pychiatry, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, C., Geach, N., Alexander, R., Chester, V., Devapriam, J., Duggan, C., Langdon, P. E., Lindsay, B., McCarthy, J., & Walker, D.-M. (2017). Researching outcomes from forensic services for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A systematic review, evidence synthesis and expert and patient/carer consultation. Health Services and Delivery Research, 5(3), 1–102. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr05030
   Google Scholar
• Morrissey, C., Langdon, P. E., Geach, N., Chester, V., Ferriter, M., Lindsay, W. R., McCarthy, J., Devapriam, J., Walker, D.-M., Duggan, C., & Alexander, R. (2017). A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities. BJPsych Open, 3(1), 41–56. 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottram, P. (2007). HMP Liverpool, Styal and Hindley Study Report. Available from the author from the University of Liverpool, The School of Population, Community and Behavioural Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Mudathikundan, F., Chao, O., & Forrester, A. (2014). Mental health and fitness to plead proposals in England and Wales. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37(2), 135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, G., & Mason, J. (2014). Forensic and offending behaviours. In Handbook of psychopathology in intellectual disability (pp. 281–303). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England (2019). www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/national-liaison-and-diversion-service-specification-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Department of Justice (2019). Endringslov til straffeloven og straffeprosessloven [Changes in the Penal code and the Criminal proceedings code]. Norwegian Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Law Reform Commission. (2010). People with cognitive and mental health impairments in the criminal justice system: criminal responsibility and consequences. NSW Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, B. M. (2010). The emerging role of the Registered Intermediary with the vulnerable witness and offender: Facilitating communication with the police and members of the judiciary. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, B. M. (2012). Accused of murder: supporting the communication needs of a vulnerable defendant at court and at the police station. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 3(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/20420921211280060
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, T., Kermit, P., Dahl, N. C., Søndenaa, E., & Envik, R. (2018). Rettssikkerhet–likeverd og likeverdig behandling. Bodø.
   Google Scholar
• R v M (John) EWCA Crim 3452 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• R v Pritchard (1836). 7 C. & P. 303.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Johansson-Love, J. (2009). Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(4), 450–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. P., Blackwood, N. J., Farnham, F., Pickup, G. J., & Watts, M. J. (2008). Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: A systematic review of the constructs and their application. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19(4), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940801947909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. A., McGilloway, S., Dempster, M., Browne, F., & Donnelly, M. (2013). Effectiveness of criminal justice liaison and diversion services for offenders with mental disorders: A review. Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.), 64(9), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D., McGilloway, S., & Donnelly, M. (2016). A prospective comparative evaluation of a Criminal Justice Liaison and Diversion Service in Belfast. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 27(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1102313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council (2019). Overarching principles: Sentencing offenders with mental health conditions or disorders consultation. Sentencing Council. www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Council (2020). Overarching principles: Sentencing offenders with mental disorders, developmental disorders, or neurological impairments. Response to consultation. www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Mental-Health-guideline-response-to-consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Skarstad, K. (2018). Human rights through the lens of disability. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 36(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917753251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., & Beyer, J. F. (2008). Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the criminal justice system and implications for transition planning. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(4), 421–430. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ819934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndenaa, E., & Spro, M. (2016). Lettere psykisk utviklingshemmede i strafferettslig forstand – En gjennomgang av alle registrerte saker fra Lovdata 2002–2014. Lov Og Rett, 56(08), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3061-2016-08-04
   Google Scholar
• Søndenaa, E., Linaker, O., Bjørgen, T. G., & Nøttestad, J. A. (2010). Screening for intellectual disability among adults. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening, 130(15), 1475–1477. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.09.0643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Søndenaa, E., Rasmussen, K., Palmstierna, T., & Nøttestad, J. (2008). The prevalence and nature of intellectual disability in Norwegian prisons. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(12), 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndenaa, E., Friestad, C., Storvik, B., & Johnsen, B. (2019). Criminal responsibility and challenges in the criminal justice system for people with intellectual disability in Norway. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v7i1.2882
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S., Forrester, A., Davies, S., & Nadkarni, R. (2013). Developing criminal justice liaison and diversion services: Research priorities and international learning. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health: CBMH, 23(5), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, J. (2009). No One Knows: Offenders with learning disabilities and learning difficulties. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 5(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449200903115797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talbot, J., & Jacobson, J. (2010). Adult defendants with learning disabilities and the criminal courts. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 1(2), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.5042/jldob.2010.0416
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. L. A. (2011). Fitness to plead and stand trial: The impact of mild intellectual disability. UCL (University College London).
   Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, P. H. (2018). The Right to Fair Preliminary Investigation and Trial for Vulnerable Defendants. The law of the European Convention on Human Rights, European Union Law and the Case of the Netherlands (July 12, 2018). In Ronnie Mackay & Warren Brookbanks (Eds.), Fitness to plead: International and comparative perspectives (pp. 231–253). (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018) (Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3287898
   Google Scholar
• Vanny, K. A., Levy, M., Greenberg, D., & Hayes, S. (2009). Mental illness and intellectual disability in magistrates courts in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 53(3), 289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar