The effects of immediate recall and subsequent retrieval strategy on eyewitness memory

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., Text Revision). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 22, 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3
   Google Scholar
• Areh, I. (2011). Gender-related differences in eyewitness testimony. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 559–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, J. G., Palyo, S. A., Winer, E. H., Schwagler, B. E., & Ang, E. J. (2007). Virtual reality exposure therapy for PTSD symptoms after a road accident: An uncontrolled case series. Behavior Therapy, 38(1), 39–48
   Google Scholar
• Belli, R. F., & Al Baghal, T. (2016). Parallel associations and the structure of autobiographical knowledge. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensi, L., Nori, R., Gambetti, E., & Giusberti, F. (2011). The Enhanced Cognitive Interview: A study on the efficacy of shortened variants and single techniques. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.497485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Williams, K. D. (Eds.). (2017). Psychology and law: An empirical perspective. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelfranc-Allen, J., & Hope, L. (2018). Visual communication desensitisation (VCD): A novel two-phased approach to interviewing traumatised individuals in investigative contexts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1474814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E., Paterson, H., & van Golde, C. (2019). The effects of repeatedly recalling a traumatic event on eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory, 27(4), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1533563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological review, 82, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 594–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present… and future? Memory, 10, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time‐critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885).
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interview protocols for improving eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 53–80). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Confrey, M. (2018). Witness testimony. In The psychology of criminal investigation (pp. 113–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a Self-Administered Interview tool. Law and Human Behaviour, 33(4), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, D. W., Powell, B., Bremer, D., Hoine, H., & Stern, J. (1969). Alcohol and recall: State-dependent effects in man. Science, 163, 1358–1360. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3873.1358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Mullis, R., & Gabbert, F. (2013). Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Kinninger, M., Kontogianni, F., Bracey, A., Hanger, A., & Hope, L. (2019). Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans. Law and Human Behaviour, 43(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontogianni, F., Hope, L., Taylor, P., Vrij, A., & Gabbert, F. (2018). The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krix, A., Sauerland, M., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2014). Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: What works at immediate and subsequent recall? Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.902456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau, T. M., & Bekker, H. (1992). The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murre, J. M., & Dros, J. (2015). Replication and analysis of Ebbinghaus’ forgetting curve. PLoS ONE, 10(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairne, J. (2002). The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory, 10, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H., van Golde, C., Devery, C., Cowdery, N., & Kemp, R. (2018). iWitnessed: Capturing contemporaneous accounts to enhance witness evidence. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2018.12036102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2016). Improving the enhanced cognitive interview with a new interview strategy: Category clustering recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo, R., Albuquerque, P., Vitorino, F., & Bull, R. (2017). Enhancing the cognitive interview with an alternative procedure to witness-compatible questioning: Category clustering recall. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H., Chevroulet, C., van Golde, C., Cowdery, N., & Kemp, R. (2020). Protecting eyewitness memory using a smartphone app. Manuscript under review.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., Fisher, R. P., & Wright, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11–42). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D. (1989). State-trait anxiety inventory: Bibliography (2nd ed.). Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, D., & Takarangi, M. K. (2012). False memories for missing aspects of traumatic events. Acta Psychologica, 141(3), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temler, M., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2020) Contamination or natural variation? A comparison of contradictions from suggested contagion and intrinsic variation in repeated autobiographical accounts. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapar, A., & McDermott, K. B. (2001). False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorley, C. (2018). Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall. Memory, 26, 1128–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1432058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., & Brewer, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.9.2.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E. (1991). Concepts of human memory. In L. R. Squire, N. M. Weinberger, G. Lynch, & J. L. McGaugh (Eds.), Memory: Organisation and locus of change (pp. 3–32). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vaart, W. (2004). The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardised research interviews: A split ballot study. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(2), 217–301.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vaart, W., & Glasner, T. (2007). Applying a timeline as a recall aid in a telephone survey: A record check study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Build-up of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 1(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. S., & Marmar, C. R. (1996). The impact of event scale - revised. In J. Wilson & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399–411). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshihama, M., Gillespie, B., Hammock, A. C., Belli, R. E., & Tolman, R. M. (2005). Does the life history calendar method facilitate the recall of intimate partner violence? Comparison of two methods of data collection. Social Work Research, 29(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/29.3.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Roberts, K., & Teoh, Y. (2018). Children’s recall and source monitoring of a repeated event using a timeline as an interview aid. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3451
   Google Scholar