Examining the effect of religiosity, moral disengagement, personal attribution, comprehension and proximity on juror decision making regarding insanity pleas

References

• Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. E. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). RESEARCH: A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4
   Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2005). Fundamentalism and authoritarianism. In Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 378–393). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Ven, T. V. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38(3), 719–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00904.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State. (1998). PEOPLE v. TORTORICI | 249 A.D.2d 588 (1998) | ad2d5881142. https://www.leagle.com/decision/1998837249ad2d5881142
   Google Scholar
• Arens, R., Granfield, D. D., & Susman, J. (1965). Jurors, jury charges and insanity. Catholic University Law Review, 14, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrios, B. A., Corbitt, L. C., Estes, J. P., & Topping, J. S. (1976). Effect of a social stigma on interpersonal distance. The Psychological Record, 26(3), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattey, R. A., & Fondacaro, M. R. (2018). The misjudgment of criminal responsibility. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H., & Miller, M. K. (2009). God in the courtroom: Religion's role at trial. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328677.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2017). People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 30(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9027-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004). The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 11(1), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2004.11.1.154
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. E., Connors, J. F., & Leonard, R. C. (1969). Religious affiliation, church attendance, religious education and student attitudes toward race. Sociology of Religion, 30(4), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710513
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S., Perkowitz, W. T., Lurigio, A. J., & Weaver, F. M. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., Boots, D. P., & Chamlin, M. B. (2006). Political ideology and support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2006.9721217
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Vose, B. A., Jonson, C. N., & Unnever, J. D. (2007). Public support for early intervention: Is child saving a “habit of the heart”? Victims & Offenders, 2(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880701263015
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Macken, S. (2016). Scientific research and juror decision making: Theory, empirical research, and future decisions. In B. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.). Advances in psychology and law. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-29406-3.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(3), 622–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Smith, S. T., Magyar, M. S., Mullen, K., Pitta, A., & Petrila, J. (2012). “Hired guns,” “charlatans,” and their “voodoo psychobabble”: Case law references to various forms of perceived bias among mental health expert witnesses. Psychological Services, 9(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, C. G., & Sherkat, D. E. (1993). Obedience and autonomy: Religion and parental values reconsidered. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(4), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridical decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1(2), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053437
   Google Scholar
• Fan, D. P., Keltner, K. A., & Wyatt, R. O. (2002). A matter of guilt or innocence: How news reports affect support for the death penalty in the United States. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.4.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, D. M. (2011). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in capital juror decision making: An empirical examination. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71, 5182.
   Google Scholar
• Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, S. L., Eaves, D., & Kowaz, A. M. (1989). The assessment, treatment and community outcome of insanity acquittees: Forensic history and response to treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 12(2-3), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(89)90005-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., Davenport, E., Chamlin, M. B., & Bursik, R. J. (1992). Protestant fundamentalism and the retributive doctrine of punishment. Criminology, 30(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., & McGill, A. L. (1994). Religion, attribution style, and punitiveness toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 32(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, L. S., & Wasyliw, O. E. (1988). A psychometric study of stereotypes: Assessment of malingering in a criminal forensic group. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(3), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5203_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, T. A., Cook, N. E., & Berman, G. L. (2010). Navigating the expanding field of law and psychology: A comprehensive guide to graduate education. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930903446690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences: Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1462534654.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, D. R., Ryan, K. D., & Cauce, A. M. (1999). Personal victimization in a high-risk environment: Homeless and runaway adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427899036004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 205316801560464–205316801560412. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609357246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., Barnard-Brak, L. M., Patock-Peckham, J. A., LaBouff, J. P., & Carlisle, R. D. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S. (2015). Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 42–43, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury and the death penalty. PsycEXTRA Dataset, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/e452852008-267
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. American Psychological Association. ISBN: 1-59147-118-4
   Google Scholar
• Kirshenbaum, J. M., Miller, M. K., Kaplan, T., Cramer, R. J., Trescher, S. A., & Neal, T. M. S. (2021). Development and validation of a general legal moral disengagement scale. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(8), 751–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1850722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivisto, A. J., & Swan, S. A. (2011). Attitudes toward the Insanity Defense in capital cases: (Im)partiality from Witherspoon to Witt. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 11(4), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2011.562811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, M., Wallach, L., & Levine, D. (2007). Psychological problems, social issues, and the law (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon. ISBN-13: 978-0205474547
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04271304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymburner, J. A., & Roesch, R. (1999). The insanity defense. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22(3–4), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(99)00006-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & Fenwick, K. (2015). Educating Canadian jurors about the not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder defence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences du Comportement, 47(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Math, S. B., Kumar, C. N., & Moirangthem, S. (2015). Insanity Defense: Past, present, and future. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37(4), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.168559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott, C. M., & Miller, M. K. (2016). Individual differences impact support for vigilante justice. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 8(3), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2015-0186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mens Rea in the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code. (n.d.). The concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law: The case for a unified approach. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472566355.ch-004
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2013). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (5th ed.). Pyrczak Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Boster, F. J. (1977). Three images of a trial: Their implications for psychological research. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process (pp. 19–38). Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. K., & Perez, L. (2019). How moral disengagement and individual differences relate to beliefs regarding enhanced interrogation techniques. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 15, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossière, A., & Maeder, E. M. (2016). Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 49(Part A), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.05.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neal, T. M., & Cramer, R. J. (2017). Moral disengagement in legal judgments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 14(4), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necka, E. A., Cacioppo, S., Norma, G., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2016). Measuring the prevalence of problematic respondent behaviors among MTurk, campus, and community participants. PLoS One, 11(6), e0157732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, R. G., Gawronski, B., Hampson, E., Sorrentino, R. M., Szeto, A., & Ye, Y. (2010). Physical proximity in anticipation of meeting someone with schizophrenia: The role of explicit evaluations, implicit evaluations and cortisol levels. Schizophrenia Research, 124(1–3), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P. (1991). A comparison of insanity defense standards on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 15(5), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogloff, J. R. P. (2000). Two steps forward and one step backward: The law and psychology movement(s) in the 20th century. Law and Human Behavior, 24(4), 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005596414203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osofsky, M. J., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29(4), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-4930-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, S. L., & Medina, S. L. (2008). The stigma of mental illness. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlin, M. L. (1996). Myths, realities, and the political world: The anthropology of insanity defense attitudes. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law, 24(1), 5–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettys, T. E. (2007). The emotional juror. Fordham Law Rev, 76, 1609. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol76/iss3/12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, G. (1997). The evolution of the Insanity Defense. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 13(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986297013003003
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P., & Dubber, M. (2005). An introduction to the Model Penal Code of the American Law Institute. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 10(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.661165
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., James, R., Ogloff, P., Zapf, P., Hart, S., & Otto, R. (1999). Jail and prison inmates. In Comprehensive clinical psychology: Applications in diverse populations (pp. 85–104). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0080-4270(73)00167-X
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. C., Barros, S., & Santos, I. (2016). Stigma: The perspective of workers on community mental health services-Brazil. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 3, 233339361667044–233339361667049. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393616670442
   Google Scholar
• Saroglou, V. (2016). Intergroup Conflict, Religious Fundamentalism, and Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115621174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlachter, A., & Duckitt, J. (2002). Psychopathology, authoritarian attitudes and prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630203200201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, C. H., & Said, I. (2020). Religious perceptions of crime and implications for punitiveness. Punishment & Society, 146247452096003. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520960038
   Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., Louden, J. E., & Evans, J. (2004). Venirepersons’s attitudes toward the insanity defense: Developing, refining, and validating a scale. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0487-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloat, L. M., & Frierson, R. L. (2005). Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 33(2), 208–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. A. (2018). Impact of veteran status and timing of PTSD diagnosis on criminal ustice outcomes. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 6(3), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare6030080
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. M., & Dear, M. J. (1981). Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 7(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/7.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 18 U.S. Code § 4243. United States Code, 2006 edition. containing the general and permanent laws of the United States enacted during the 110th Congress, first session, January 4, 2007 to January 8, 2008. (2009). Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P. O.
   Google Scholar
• Unnever, J., & Cochran, J., & Cullen, F., & Applegate, B. (2010). The pragmatic American: attributions of crime and the hydraulic relation hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902855362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cappellen, P., Saroglou, V., & Toth-Gauthier, M. (2016). Religiosity and prosocial behavior mong churchgoers: Exploring underlying mechanisms. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.958004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woestehoff, S. A., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E. F., Trescher, S. A., Miller, M. K., & Mcdermott, C. M. (2018). Individual differences relate to support for insanity and postpartum depression legal defenses: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1351905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulff, D. M. (1991). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, S., Fenwick, K., & Maeder, E. M. (2017). Criminal responsibility in Canada: Mental illness stigma education and the insanity defense. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1391357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelderman, L. A. (2018). Cognitive rigidity explains the relationship between religious fundamentalism and insanity defense attitudes. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21(7), 686–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1551340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelderman, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (2017). Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: Effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelderman, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (2016). Religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward the insanity defense: The mediating roles of criminal attributions and attitudes toward the mentally ill. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(6), 872–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1160005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelderman, L. A., West, M. P., & Miller, M. K. (2019). Death penalty decision‐making: Fundamentalist beliefs and the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahnow, R., Mazerolle, L., Wickes, R., & Corcoran, J. (2017). Living near violence: How proximity to violence shapes perceptions of police effectiveness and confidence in police. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E., & Johnson, D. T. (2006). Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285949
   Google Scholar