298
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Professionals’ perceptions of a multi-agency computerised data sharing system

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Adams, C., & Lee-Jones, K. (2017). Sharing personal information in the child protection context: Impediments in the Australian legal framework. Child & Family Social Work, 22(4), 1349–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12352
  • Apesoa-Varano, E. C. (2013). Interprofessional conflict and repair: A study of boundary work in the hospital. Sociological Perspectives, 56(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2013.56.3.327
  • Bailey, C., Powell, M., & Baksheev, G. N. (2017). Evaluation of a database for tracking cases of child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 24(6), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1327314
  • Bellamy, C.,   6.P., Raab, C., Warren, A., & Heeney, C. (2008). Information-sharing and confidentiality in social policy: Regulating multi-agency working. Public Administration, 86, 737–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00723.x
  • Boyland, J. R. (2019). A social constructivist approach to the gathering of empirical data. Australian Counselling Research Journal, 13, 30–34. http://www.acrjournal.com.au/journal?id=18
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V., (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
  • Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Pithouse, A., Thompson, K., & Davey, D. (2010). Performing “initial assessment”: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn162
  • Brown, B., Crawford, P., & Darongkamas, J. (2000). Blurred roles and permeable boundaries: The experience of multidisciplinary working in community mental health. Health & Social Care in the Community, 8(6), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00268.x
  • Charman, S. (2014). Blue light communities: Cultural interoperability and shared learning between ambulance staff and police officers in emergency response. Policing and Society, 24(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784306
  • Comeau-Vallée, M., & Langley, A. (2020). The interplay of inter- and intraprofessional boundary work in multidisciplinary teams. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1649–1672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619848020
  • Connelly, L. M., & Peltzer, J. N. (2016). Underdeveloped themes in qualitative research: Relationship with interviews and analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist CNS, 30(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000173
  • Crawford, A., & L’Hoiry, X. (2017). Boundary crossing: Networked policing and emergent ‘communities of practice’ in safeguarding children. Policing and Society, 27(6), 636–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1341508
  • Cresswell, D. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Currie, G., Finn, R., & Martin, G. (2010). Role transition and the interaction of relational and social identity: New nursing roles in the english NHS. Organization Studies, 31(7), 941–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610373199
  • Foldy, S., Grannis, S., Ross, D., & Smith, T. (2014). A ride in the time machine: Information management capabilities health departments will need. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1592–1600. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301956
  • Gillingham, P. (2013). The development of electronic information systems for the future: Practitioners, “embodied structures” and “technologies-in-practice. British Journal of Social Work, 43(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr202
  • Gillingham, P. (2017). Electronic information systems in human service organizations: Using theory to inform future design. International Social Work, 60(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814554856
  • Gray, D. E. (2017). Doing research in the real world (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy. SAGE.
  • Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press.
  • Keeley, M., Bullen, J., Bates, S., Katz, I., Choi, A. (2015). Opportunities for information sharing: Case studies. https://www.arts.unsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/documents/SPRC_Report__Opportunities_for_Information_Sharing.pdf
  • Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of New Work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620310504837
  • Leach, C., Baksheev, G. N., & Powell, M. (2015). Child sexual abuse research: Challenges of case tracking through administrative databases. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(6), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1019333
  • Masson, J., Garside, L., & Jenney, S. (2020). Linking children’s social care data to information about their care proceedings to understand the use of care proceedings and their effects on parents, children and local authorities. Child & Family Social Work, 25(3), 628–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12737
  • Munro, E. (2019). Decision-making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12589
  • Nash, M., & Walker, L. (2009). Mappa – is closer collaboration really the key to effectiveness? Policing, 3(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pap007
  • Neave, M., Faulkner, P., & Nicholson, T. (2016). Royal Commission into family violence: Report and recommendations: Volume I. Melbourne, Australia. https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/file_uploads/1b_RFV_284ppA4_ReportRecommendations_VolumeI.WEB_yhw6Fgch.pdf
  • Nugus, P., Greenfield, D., Travaglia, J., Westbrook, J., & Braithwaite, J. (2010). How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care. Social Science & Medicine, 71(5), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.029
  • Phillips, C. (2002). From voluntary to statutory status: Reflecting on the experience of three partnerships established under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. In G. Hughes, E. McLaughlin, & E. Muncie (Eds.), Crime prevention and community safety (pp. 163–181). Sage.
  • Rees, G. (2020). Getting the Sergeants on your side: The importance of interpersonal relationships and cultural interoperability for generating interagency collaboration between nurses and the police in custody suites. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12989
  • Richardson, S., & Asthana, S. (2006). Inter-agency information sharing in health and social care services: The role of professional culture. British Journal of Social Work, 36(4), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch257
  • Rodriquez, J. (2015). Who is on the medical team?: Shifting the boundaries of belonging on the ICU. Social Science & Medicine, 144, 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.014
  • Stanley, N., Miller, P., Foster, H. R., & Thomson, G. (2011). Children’s experiences of domestic violence: Developing an integrated response from police and child protection services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(12), 2372–2391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510383030
  • Tregeagle, S., & Darcy, M. (2008). Child welfare and information technology: Today’s challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 38(8), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm048
  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  • Wolgemuth, J. R., Erdil-Moody, Z., Opsal, T., Cross, J. E., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E. M., & Colomer, S. (2015). Participants’ experiences of the qualitative interview: Considering the importance of research paradigms. Qualitative Research, 15(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114524222

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.