The effect on judgment of attributing religious affiliation to a terrorist suspect

References

• Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality:. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, A. (2008). Discursive illusions in the American National Strategy for combating terrorism. Journal of Language and Politics, 7(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.02bha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caricati, L. (2007). The relationship between social dominance orientation and gender: The mediating role of social values. Sex Roles, 57(3–4), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9231-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The Primacy of Agency over Competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45(5), 347–356. http://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. Y., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Phelan, J. C., Yu, G., & Yang, L. H. (2015). Racial and mental illness stereotypes and discrimination: An identity-based analysis of the Virginia Tech and Columbine shootings. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission Nationale Consultative des Droits de l’Homme. (2021). La lutte contre le racisme, l’antisémitisme et xénophobie [Report on racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia] (Report No. ISBN 978-2-11-157329-1). Commission Nationale Consultative des Droits de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). Not in my backyard! Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and support for strict immigration policies at home and abroad. Political Psychology, 35(3), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambrun, M., & Vatiné, E. (2009). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, E., Bushman, B. J., Bezemer, M. D., Kerkhof, P., & Vermeulen, I. E. (2009). Terrorism News reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delphy, C. (2008). Classer, dominer. Qui sont les « autres »? [To classify to dominate. Who are the « others »?]. La Fabrique.
   Google Scholar
• Dougez, C., Taillandier-Schmitt, A., & Combalbert, N. (2018). Influence of acculturation strategies on the judgement of a violent act committed by a Maghrebian woman. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, S., Dambrun, M., & Guimond, S. (2004). La dominance sociale et les « mythes légitimateurs »: validation d’une version française de l’échelle d’orientation à la dominance sociale [Social dominance and “legitimizing myths”: Validation of a French version of the Social Dominance Orientation scale]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 17(4), 97–126. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00114615
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, L., & Schulte, I. (2019). Warmth and competence stereotypes about immigrant groups in Germany. PLos One, 14(9), e0223103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, M., & Dubé, R. (2017). Une enquête théorique et empirique sur les menaces externes à l’indépendance judiciaire dans le cadre du sentencing [A theoretical and empirical investigation of external threats to judicial independence in the context of sentencing]. Revue générale de droit, 47(1), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040495ar
   Google Scholar
• Green, E. G. T., Thomsen, L., Sidanius, J., Staerklé, C., & Potanina, P. (2009). Reactions to crime as a hierarchy regulating strategy: The moderating role of social dominance orientation. Social Justice Research, 22(4), 416–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0106-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., Clare, A., Newheiser, A.-K., & Voci, A. (2011). Individual and situational predictors of religious prejudice: Impact of religion, social dominance orientation, intergroup contact, and mortality salience. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(3), 143–155. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-22490-002
   Google Scholar
• Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2014). Dimensions of social dominance orientation: The roles of legitimizing myths and national identification. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social Dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut Français d’Opinion Publique (2021). Le rapport des Français à la religion [The Relationship of the French to religion] (Report No. 118372). https://www.ifop.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/118372-Rapport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kastenmüller, A., Greitemeyer, T., Ai, A. L., Winter, G., & Fischer, P. (2011). In the face of terrorism: Evidence that belief in literal immortality reduces prejudice under terror threat. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(3), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzur, P. F., Friehs, M. ‐T., Asbrock, F., & Zalk, M. H. W. (2019). Stereotype content of refugees subgroups in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1344–1358. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 117–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0112-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bohec, G., & Lebon, K. (2021). Rapport d’information fait au nom de la délégation aux droits des femmes à l’égalité des chances entre les hommes et les femmes, sur les stéréotypes de genre [Information Report made on behalf of the delegation for women’s rights to equal opportunities between men and women, on gender stereotypes] (Report No. 4517). https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/rapports/ega/l15b4517_rapport-information
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liogier, R. (2012). Mythe de l’islamisation. Essai sur une obsession collective [Myth of Islamization. Essay on a collective obsession]. Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Lockhart, C., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Religion makes – and unmakes – the status quo: religiosity and spirituality have opposing effects on conservatism via RWA and SDO. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1607540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, N., & Tiberj, V. (2016). Who were the “Charlie” in the streets? A socio-political approach of the January 11 rallies. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mégie, A., & Pawella, J. (2017). Juger dans le contexte de la “guerre contre le terrorisme »: Les procès correctionnels des filières djihadistes. [Judging in the context of the “war on terror”: Jihadist criminal trials]. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 2(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.3917/cdlj.1702.0235
   Google Scholar
• Mignard, J.-F. (2018). Les effets sociaux des politiques antiterroristes. Hommes & Libertés, 184, 24–25. https://www.ldh-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/HL184-Actualité-6.-Les-effets-sociaux-des-politiques-antiterroristes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., & Walklate, S. L. (2006). Criminology and terrorism: Which thesis? Risk society or governmentality? The British Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor, M., Kteily, N., Siem, B., & Mazziotta, A. (2019). “Terrorist” or “Mentally Ill”: Motivated biases rooted in partisanship shape attributions about violent actors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618764808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, J. E., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2006). Perceptions of police use of deadly force. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, K. A. (2011). Framing Islam: An analysis of U.S. media coverage of terrorism since 9/11. Communication Studies, 62(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.533599
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragazzi, R. P. S. M., Davidshofer, S., Perret, S., & Tawfik, A. (2018). Les effets de la lutte contre le terrorisme et la radicalisation sur les populations musulmanes en France [The effects of the fight against terrorism and radicalization on Muslim populations in France]. Centre d’Étude sur les Conflits, Liberté et Sécurité (CCLS). https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2976678/view
   Google Scholar
• Richards, A. (2011). The problem with radicalization: The remit of “Prevent” and the need to refocus on terrorism in the UK. International Affairs, 87(1), 143–152. http://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468_2346.2011.00964.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigouste, M. (2007). L’ennemi intérieur, de la guerre coloniale au contrôle sécuritaire. [The internal enemy, from colonial warfare to security control]. Cultures & Conflits, 67(67), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.3128
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B. A., Kelly, E., Cohen, N. P., & Guarino, C. (2016). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation indirectly predict support for the new your city’s stop-&-frisk policy through prejudice. Current Psychology, 35(1), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9364-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharrer, E., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2015). Intervening in the media’s influence on stereotypes of race and ethnicity: The role of media literacy education. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sèze, R. (2021). Sécuritisation des politiques sociales et politisations des identités musulmanes en Europe: les cas français et britanniques [Securitization of Social Policies and Politicization of Muslim identities in Europe: The French and British cases]. Cahiers de la sécurité et de la justice, 46, 112–120. https://www.ihemi.fr/sites/default/files/articles/files/2020-01/csj_46_seze_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S., & Pratto, F. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(4), 338–366. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S., & Pratto, F. (2006). Social Dominance Orientation, gender, and increasing educational exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1640–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00074.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., & Hagendoorn, A. (2009). When ways of life collide multiculturalism and its discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Son Hing, L. S., & Zanna, M. P. (2010). Individual differences. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 163–178). SAGE Publication. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n10
   Google Scholar
• Taillandier-Schmitt, A., & Combalbert, N. (2017). Influence of acculturation strategies on the judgement and punishment of an offender of Maghrebian descent. Psychology, Crime & Low, 23(9), 859–873. http://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1335731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D. (2019). Ethnicity and crime in the Netherlands. International Criminal Justice Review, 29(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567717752218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerhouni, O., Rougier, M., & Muller, D. (2016). Who (really) is Charlie? French cities with lower implicit prejudice towards Arabs demonstrated larger participants rates in Charlie Hebdo rallies. International Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar