Discriminative and predictive validity of risk assessment measures for women incarcerated for serious violent offences in Australia

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The level of service inventory–revised. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI): User’s Manual. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. (2008). The Level of Service/Risk Need Responsivity Inventory (LS/RNR): Scoring guide. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. L. (1998). Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version (LSI-R:SV): User’s manual. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R. C., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A., & Wormith, J. S. (2012). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X10395716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2019). Prisoners in Australia. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/prisoners-australia/2019#:∼:text=There%20were%2043%2C028%20prisoners%2C%20an,prisoners%20per%20100%2C000%20adult%20population.
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2020). Monitoring changes in risk of reoffending: A prospective study of 632 men on community supervision. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(10), 886–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanche, P. (2019). timeROC: Time-dependent ROC curve and AUC for censored survival data (Version 0.4) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/timeROC/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Blanchette, K., & Brown, S. L. (2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T., Breitenbach, M., Dieterich, W., Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2012). Women’s pathways to serious and habitual crime: A person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsive factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1481–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812456777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookstein, D. M., Daffern, M., Ogloff, J. R. P., Campbell, R. E., & Chu, C. M. (2021). Predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in a sample of Australian forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(3), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1775152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809333610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Roberts, C., Farrington, D. P., & Rogers, R. D. (2009). Gender differences in structured risk assessment: Comparing the accuracy of five instruments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, N. R. (2007). Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation, 115(7), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationha.106.672402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrections Act 1986 (Vic). http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca1986149/
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. T., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2009). Discounting women: Context matters in risk and need assessment. Critical Criminology, 17(4), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-009-9084-x
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. T., Lloyd, C. D., & Polaschek, D. L. (2022). Does reassessment enhance the prediction of imminent criminal recidivism? Replicating Lloyd et al. (2020) with high-risk parolees. Assessment, 29(5), 962–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121993216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., Bruggeman, M., & Lancel, M. (2019). Gender-sensitive violence risk assessment: Predictive validity of six tools in female forensic psychiatric patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818824135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence—User guide. Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, H. L., Campbell, M. A., & Wershler, J. L. (2018). Real-world use of the risk–need–responsivity model and the level of service/case management inventory with community-supervised offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345, e4692. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854802029004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerds, T. A. (2020). pec: Prediction error curves for risk prediction models in survival analysis (Version 2020.11.17) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pec/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, H., Kelty, S. F., & Julian, R. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory among Australian offenders completing community-based sentences. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(11), 1089–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815596419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gower, M., Spiranovic, C., Morgan, F., & Saunders, J. (2020). The predictive validity of risk assessment tools used in Australia for female offenders: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53Article, 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D., Schneider, M., Griswold, H., Belfi, B., Herrera, M., & DeBlasi, A. (2016). A comparison of the HCR-20V3 among male and female insanity acquittees: A retrospective file study. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2015.1134726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2009). Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering gender and risk assessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00549.x
   Google Scholar
• Harrell Jr, F. E., & Dupont, C. (2021). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous (Version 4.6-0) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Harrell Jr, F. E. (2021). rms: Regression modeling strategies (Version 6.2-0) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rms/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, A. C., Delgado, R. H., Vardsveen, T. C., & Wiener, R. L. (2018). Validation and application of the LS/CMI in Nebraska probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(6), 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818763231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D. Y., & Wei, L. J. (1989). The robust inference for the cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(408), 1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C. D., Hanson, R. K., Richards, D. K., & Serin, R. C. (2020). Reassessment improves prediction of criminal recidivism: A prospective study of 3,421 individuals in New Zealand. Psychological Assessment, 32(6), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Lovins, B., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Validating the level of service inventory-revised and the level of service inventory: Screening version with a sample of probationers. The Prison Journal, 89(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509334755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, J. T., & Scherer, H. (2017). Beyond recidivism: Exploring the predictive validity of a correctional risk assessment tool on offender victimization. The Prison Journal, 97(6), 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517734493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., & Stockdale, K. C. (2022). Can “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools be used with women and girls? If so, how? In S. L. Brown & L. Gelsthorpe (Eds.). The Wiley handbook on what works with girls and women in conflict with the law: A critical review of theory practice, and policy. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2014). Thirty years of research on the level of service scales: A meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rettinger, L. J., & Andrews, D. A. (2010). General risk and need, gender specificity, and the recidivism of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809349438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2021). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (Version 2.1.9) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossdale, S. V., Tully, R. J., & Egan, V. (2020). The HCR-20 for predicting violence in adult females: A meta-analysis. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20(1), 15–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2019.1681875
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., Boppre, B., & Kelly, B. (2016). Gender-responsive risk and need assessment: Implications for the treatment of justice-involved women. In Handbook on risk and need assessment (pp. 236–259). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, M. L., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Daffern, M. (2023). Investigating the dynamic nature of multiple risk assessment instruments in a forensic mental health hospital. Psychological Assessment, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Cullen, F. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta‐analysis of the LSI‐R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00551.x
   Google Scholar
• Struthers, C. A., & Kalbfleisch, J. D. (1986). Misspecified proportional hazard models. Biometrika, 73(2), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Therneau, T. M., Lumley, T., Atkinson, E., & Crowson, C. (2021). survival: Survival analysis (Version 3.2-11) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Thiele, C. (2021). cutpointr: Determine and evaluate optimal cutpoints in binary classification tasks (Version 1.1.1) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cutpointr/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S., Sutherland, P., & Millsteed, M. (2019). Characteristics and offending of women in prison in Victoria, 2012–2018. Crime Statistics Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley. (2015). World female imprisonment list: Women and girls in penal institutions, including pre-trial detainees/remand prisoners. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/world_female_prison_4th_edn_v4_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. I., Wellbeloved-Stone, J. M., Dietz, P. E., & Millspaugh, S. B. (2018). Gender and violence risk assessment in prisons. Psychological Services, 15(4), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, I. (2011). The Utility of Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) Assessments within NSW Correctional Environments (Research Bulletin No. 29). Corrective Services NSW: January 2011. Retrieved from https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/content/dam/dcj/corrective-services-nsw/documents/research-and-statistics/rb29-utility-of-level-of-service-inventory-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Historical Clinical Risk-20: Assessing risk for aggression, Version 2. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, D. S. (1995). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: International geophysics series (Vol. 59). Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2021). tidyverse (Version 1.3.1) [R package]. https://www.tidyverse.org/
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S. C., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesberg, J. A., Scanlan, J. M., Hanby, L. J., Serin, R. C., & Polaschek, D. L. (2015). Predicting women’s recidivism: Validating a dynamic community-based ‘gender-neutral’tool. Probation Journal, 62(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550514562851
   Google Scholar