When being unattractive is an advantage: effects of face perception on intuitive culpability judgments

References

• Bar, M., Neta, M., & Linz, H. (2006). Very first impressions. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 6(2), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C., Lee, G., Pazzani, L., & Vuk, M. (2021). If looks could kill: Do characteristics of female offenders influence death penalty sentencing decisions? Women & Criminal Justice, 31(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1688223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017). Changing our implicit minds: How, when, and why implicit evaluations can be rapidly revised. In J. M. Olson (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 56, pp. 131–199). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W., Ribeiro, B. B., Studio, A., & Chang, M. W. (2022). Package ‘shinydashboard’.
   Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2014). Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.85472
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engell, A. D., Haxby, J. V., & Todorov, A. (2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75–109). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60318-4
   Google Scholar
• Ford, K. D., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Pound, N. (2022). Justice is (not so) blind: Effects of facial masculinity and agreeableness on perceptions of criminal guilt. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000246
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2006). Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad? Social Cognition, 24(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-García, A., Beltrán, D., & Calvo, M. G. (2019). Facial attractiveness impressions precede trustworthiness inferences: Lower detection thresholds and faster decision latencies. Cognition & Emotion, 33(2), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1444583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814273.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, F., Jamrozik, A., Rosen, M. E., Aguirre, G., Sarwer, D. B., & Chatterjee, A. (2019). Behavioural and neural responses to facial disfigurement. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8021. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/j8v4n
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hester, N. (2019). Perceived negative emotion in neutral faces: Gender-dependent effects on attractiveness and threat. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 19(8), 1490–1494. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, B., Evans, A. M., Stel, M., & Beest, I. (2019a). Explaining the persistent influence of facial cues in social decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(6), 1008–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, B., Evans, A. M., Stel, M., & Beest, I. (2019b). Who judges a book by its cover? The prevalence, structure, and correlates of physiognomic beliefs. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/8dq4x/
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, B., Todorov, A. T., Evans, A. M., & Beest, I. (2020). Can we reduce facial biases? Persistent effects of facial trustworthiness on sentencing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 104004. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a8w2d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamrozik, A., Oraa Ali, M., Sarwer, D. B., & Chatterjee, A. (2019). More than skin deep: Judgments of individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. D., & King, R. D. (2017). Facial profiling: Race, physical appearance, and punishment. Criminology, 55(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2014.883709
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(12), 1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1443
   Google Scholar
• Kirshenbaum, J. M., & Miller, M. K. (2021). Judges’ experiences with mitigating jurors’ implicit biases. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law : An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(5), 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebl, C., Greenaway, K. H., Rhee, J. J. S., & Bastian, B. (2021). Ugliness judgments alert us to cues of pathogen presence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
   Google Scholar
• Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, F., Xu, F., & Luo, X. (2015). Children’s and Adults’ judgments of facial trustworthiness: The relationship to facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(1), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.2466/27.22.PMS.121c10x1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, F., Xu, F., & Luo, X. (2016). Children’s facial trustworthiness judgments: Agreement and relationship with facial attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivera-La Rosa, A. (2018). Wrong outside, wrong inside: A social functionalist approach to the uncanny feeling. New Ideas in Psychology, 50, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivera-La Rosa, A., Arango-Tobón, O. E., & Ingram, G. P. D. (2019). Swiping right: face perception in the age of Tinder. Heliyon, 5(12), e02949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02949
   Google Scholar
• Olivera-La Rosa, A., Chuquichambi, E. G., & Ingram, G. P. (2020). Keep your (social) distance: Pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivera-La Rosa, A., Villacampa, J., Corradi, G., & Ingram, G. P. (2023). The creepy, the bad and the ugly: Exploring perceptions of moral character and social desirability in uncanny faces. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1146–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01452-w
   Google Scholar
• Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2017). The biasing effects of appearances go beyond physical attractiveness and mating motives. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x16000595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2008). Implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The perspective of the MODE model. In Attitudes. (pp. 39–84)Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/e627672009-001
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
   Google Scholar
• Patry, M. W. (2008). Attractive but guilty: Deliberation and the physical attractiveness bias. Psychological Reports, 102(3), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.3.727-733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinilla, A., Tamayo, R. M., & Neira, J. (2020). How do induced affective states bias emotional contagion to faces? A three-dimensional model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, C., & Ortiz, M. V. (2016). Psychometric study of the Rational Experiential Inventory among undergraduate Argentinean students. Revista de Psicología, 34(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201602.005
   Google Scholar
• Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2014). Are good reasoners more incest-friendly? Trait cognitive reflection predicts selective moralization in a sample of American adults. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In E. P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n15
   Google Scholar
• Shechory-Bitton, M., & Zvi, L. (2015). The effect of offender’s attractiveness and subject’s gender on judgments in swindling. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(4), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.960037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. E. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. E. (1985). Appearance and punishment: The attraction-leniency effect in the courtroom. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1985.9922900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and products. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/374696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119(3), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, C. A. M., Burton, N. S., Wilmer, J. B., Blokland, G. A. M., Germine, L., Palermo, R., Collova, J. R., & Rhodes, G. (2020). Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(19), 10218–10224. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920131117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., & Oh, D. (2021). The structure and perceptual basis of social judgments from faces. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 63, pp. 189–245). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-113011-143831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(12), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, C., Flowe, H., & Humphries, J. (2012). The effects of masculinity and suspect gender on perceptions of guilt. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018). Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 825–849. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. L., Otsuka, Y., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2016). Who are you expecting? Biases in face perception reveal prior expectations for sex and age. Journal of Vision, 16(3), 5–5. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.3.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., & Burton, A. M. (2022). Individual differences and the multidimensional nature of face perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00041-3
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615590992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, C. I., Smith, K. M., Apicella, C. L., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Evidence against the “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype in Hadza hunter gatherers. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 8693. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rw3gh
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuensch, K. L., Castellow, W. A., & Moore, C. H. (1991). Effects of defendant attractiveness and type of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 7 13, 124.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Zhu, B., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Hu, R., Liu, S., & Sun, D. (2019). Effects of male defendants’ attractiveness and trustworthiness on simulated judicial decisions in two different swindles. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebrowitz, L. A., & McDonald, S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar