‘Lock them up and throw away the key’: an evaluation of the structure of punitive attitudes

References

• Adriaenssen, A., & Aertsen, I. (2015). Punitive attitudes: Towards an operationalisation to measure individual punitivity in a multidimensional way. European Journal of Criminology, 12(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370814535376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Jurado, J. A. (2018). Aproximación al análisis de las actitudes punitivas. Revista Criminalidad, 60(1), 95–110. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1794-31082018000100095&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
   Google Scholar
• Aizpurúa, E. (2015). Delimitando el punitivismo. Las actitudes de los españoles hacia el castigo de los infractores juveniles y adultos. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica, 13, 1–30. https://reic.criminologia.net/index.php/journal/article/view/90
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2012). Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211423363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior (pp. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Albarracin, D., & Johnson, B. T. (2018). The Handbook of attitudes, volume 1: Basic principles (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albarracin, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armborst, A. (2017). How fear of crime affects punitive attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 23(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9342-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, V., Gray, E., & Farrall, S. (2023). Politics, punitiveness, and problematic populations: Public perceptions of 'scroungers’, 'unruly’ children, and ‘good for nothings’. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Falco, C., Berenblum, T., Aviv, G., & Gertz, M. (2015). Examining public preferences for the allocation of resources to rehabilitative versus punitive crime policies. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(5), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414521462
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. (2018). More money, more crime: Prosperity and rising crime in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, M., & Fondevila, G. (2021). Prisons and crime in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2017). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, A., & Arbach, K. (2020). Validation of the low self-control scale Spanish version: A Bifactor model approach. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1782283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornovalova, M. A., Choate, A. M., Fatimah, H., Petersen, K. J., & Wiernik, B. M. (2020). Appropriate use of bifactor analysis in psychopathology research: Appreciating benefits and limitations. Biological Psychiatry, 88(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borraz, F., Chouhy, C., & Rossi, M. (2012). Victimización y justicia por mano propia en Uruguay. Documento de Trabajo/FCS-DE; 7/12.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In Chris Clarkson and Rod Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (online ed.). Oxford Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, T. (2021). Punishment: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527772
   Google Scholar
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Jr., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion:“Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calaway, W. R., Callais, T., & Lightner, R. (2016). Going to prison: The effect of a prison tour on students’ attitudes toward punitiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2016.1145708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canton, R. (2017). Why punish?: An introduction to the philosophy of punishment. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, P. (2018). Implicit versus explicit attitudes: Differing manifestations of the same representational structures? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0354-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, H., Chamberlen, A., & Lewis, R. (2020). Punitiveness beyond criminal justice: Punishable and punitive subjects in an era of prevention, anti-migration and austerity. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiricos, T., Welch, K., & Gertz, M. (2004). Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology, 42(2), 358–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00523.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costelloe, M. T., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2009). Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society, 11(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474508098131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucina, J., & Byle, K. (2017). The Bifactor model fits better than the higher-order model in more than 90% of comparisons for mental abilities test batteries. Journal of Intelligence, 5(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5030027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Clark, G. A., Cullen, J. B., & Mathers, R. A. (1985). Attribution, salience, and attitudes toward criminal sanctioning. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(3), 305–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Cullen, J. B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1988). Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(88)90018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/652198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Vose, B. A., Lero Jonson, C. N., & Unnever, J. D. (2007). Public support for early intervention: Is child saving a “habit of the heart”? Victims & Offenders, 2(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880701263015
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal, 91(3_suppl), 48S–65S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415224
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, S. C., Beaujean, A. A., McGill, R. J., Benson, N. F., & Schneider, W. J. (2019). Using exploratory Bifactor analysis to understand the latent structure of multidimensional psychological measures: An example featuring the WISC-v. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1622421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes, D. (2011). Comparative criminology, globalisation and the ‘punitive turn. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., & Garland, D. (1994). Introduction: Thinking about punishment (A. Duff & D. Garland, eds., pp. 1–43). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffee, D. (1980). Correctional management: Change and control in correctional organizations. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. J., & McCray, G. (2020). The place of the Bifactor model in confirmatory factor analysis investigations into construct dimensionality in language testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, P. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. D., & Adams, M. (2003). Salvation or damnation?: Religion and correctional ideology. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885750
   Google Scholar
• Falco, D. L., & Turner, N. C. (2014). Examining causal attributions towards crime on support for offender rehabilitation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-013-9231-5
   Google Scholar
• Fortete, C., & Cesano, J. D. (2009). Punitive attitudes in Latin America. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1-2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9093-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galain, P., del Castillo, F., & Fraiman, R. (2019). Restorative justice in Uruguay: A change of lenses in a reform of criminal justice? European Journal for Security Research, 4(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0036-x
   Google Scholar
• Gargarella, R. (2019). Castigar al prójimo: Por una refundación democrática del derecho penal. Siglo XXI Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2021). What’s wrong with penal populism? Politics, the public, and criminological expertise. Asian Journal of Criminology, 16(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-021-09354-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, M. M., & Jackson, J. (2016). Authority and punishment: On the ideological basis of punitive attitudes towards criminals. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1034060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2011). Social science methodology: A unified framework. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstner, D., Wickes, R., & Oberwittler, D. (2019). Collective efficacy in australian and german neighborhoods: Testing cross-cultural measurement equivalence and structural correlates in a multi-level SEM framework. Social Indicators Research, 144(3), 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02081-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H. G., & McGill, A. L. (1994). Religion, attribution style, and punitiveness toward juvenile offenders. Criminology, 32(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet, D. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Political ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), 830–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2014). Reconceptualizing penality: Towards a multidimensional measure of punitiveness. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanslmaier, M., & Baier, D. (2016). Re-examining the relationship between religion and punitiveness: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Criminology, 13(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815626459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnagel, T., & Templeton, L. J. (2012). Emotions about crime and attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society, 14(4), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474512452519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, D., & McGrath, J. (2019). Simple rhetoric and complex punitiveness: Federal criminal justice responses to white-collar criminality. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1258–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1628289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S. J., & Roberts, M. E. (2023). Acquiescence bias inflates estimates of conspiratorial beliefs and political misperceptions. Political Analysis, 31(4), 575–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, M. J., Chiricos, T., & Gertz, M. (2005). Economic insecurity, blame, and punitive attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 22(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500219144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huskinson, T. L., & Haddock, G. (2006). Individual differences in attitude structure and the accessibility of the affective and cognitive components of attitude. Social Cognition, 24(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.4.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness? Punishment & Society, 7(3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474505053828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Hay, C. (2017). Penal populism and the public thermostat: Crime, public punitiveness, and public policy. Governance, 30(3), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., & Jackson, D. B. (2017). Does crime cause punitiveness? Crime & Delinquency, 63(12), 1572–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716638503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances: Is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification? Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 124–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112442138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornhauser, R. (2015). Economic individualism and punitive attitudes: A cross-national analysis. Punishment & Society, 17(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514560393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuru, O., & Pasek, J. (2016). Improving social media measurement in surveys: Avoiding acquiescence bias in Facebook research. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kury, H., Brandenstein, M., & Obergfell-Fuchs, J. (2009). Dimensions of punitiveness in Germany. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9090-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P. S., Chouhy, C., Singer, A. J., Stevens, J. N., & Gertz, M. (2020). Out-group animus and punitiveness in Latin America. Crime & Delinquency, 66(8), 1161–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719839354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P. S., & Pickett, J. T. (2017). Experience versus expectation: Economic insecurity, the great recession, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly, 34(5), 873–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2016.1226939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Nunn, R., & Shambaugh, J. (2018). The economics of bail and pretrial detention (p. 23). Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, C. E., & Nagin, D. S. (2022). The impact of incarceration on recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-112506
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, D. A., & Courtright, K. E. (2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. The Justice Professional, 12(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2000.9959561
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, E., & Johnson, D. (2015). The structure of public opinion on crime policy: Evidence from seven Caribbean nations. Punishment & Society, 17(4), 502–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474515604385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., Arnold, K. H., & Olson, J. M. (2004). The function-structure model of attitudes: Incorporating the need for affect (pp. 27–52). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & King, A. (2009). Once a criminal, always a criminal?: ‘Redeemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9088-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascini, P., & Houtman, D. (2006). Rehabilitation and repression: Reassessing their ideological embeddedness. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(5), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2005). The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology, 9(2), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605051639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2014). Realist criminology. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Melvin, K. B., Gramling, L. K., & Gardner, W. M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854885012002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miethe, T. D., & Lu, H. (2005). Punishment: A comparative historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2014). Probation supervision and the control of crime opportunities: An empirical assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 60(8), 1235–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712443186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior. (2019). Denuncias de Homicidios: 1 de Enero a 31 de Diciembre (2017–2018). Observatorio Nacional sobre Violencia y Criminalidad. Ministerio del Interior del Uruguay.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. N. (2000). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (New ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ortet-Fabregat, G., & Pérez, J. (1992). An assessment of the attitudes towards crime among professionals in the criminal justice system. The British Journal of Criminology, 32(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. E., Hupfeld, J., Klug, S. C., & Gabriel, U. (2002). Lay-perspectives on criminal deviance, goals of punishment, and punitivity. Social Justice Research, 15(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019928721720
   Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Gainey, R. R., Triplett, R. A., & Danner, M. J. E. (2004). What drives punitive beliefs?: Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(3), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J., & Cullen, F. T. (2014). Liberal but not stupid: Meeting the promise of downsizing prisons. Stanford Journal of Criminal Law and Policy 2, 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Petrich, D. M., Pratt, T. C., Jonson, C. L., & Cullen, F. T. (2020). A revolving door? A meta-analysis of the impact of custodial sanctions on reoffending. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f6uwm
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, E. G. (2023). Conceptualizing and measuring “punitiveness” in contemporary advanced democracies. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T. (2019). Public opinion and criminal justice policy: Theory and research. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., & Baker, T. (2014). The pragmatic American: Empirical reality or methodological artifact? Criminology, 52(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., Mancini, C., & Mears, D. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, A. R., Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Piquero, N. L., & Gordon, J. A. (2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society, 12(2), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474509357379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. D. (2013). Punitive sentiment. Criminology, 51(2), 329–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. D. (2015). Racial discrimination, fear of crime, and variability in blacks’ preferences for punitive and preventative anti-crime policies. Political Behavior, 37(2), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9285-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, H., Shavitt, S., Koo, M., & Markus, H. R. (2014). Preferences don’t have to be personal: Expanding attitude theorising with a cross-cultural perspective. Psychological Review, 121(4), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. V., & Stalans, L. J. (2019). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497971
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. D., & Indermaur, D. (2007). Predicting punitive attitudes in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.1.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2012). The proper role of the community in determining criminal liability and punishment. SSRN Electronic Journal, 54–75. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2186148
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying Bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science (New York, N.Y.), 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, M. J. (2004). Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers: Experiments on question form, wording, and context in attitude surveys. Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Pickett, J. T. (2015). Toward a better understanding of politicised policing attitudes: Conflicted conservatism and support for police use of force. Criminology, 53(4), 650–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. R., & Silver, E. (2017). Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, A. J., Chouhy, C., Lehmann, P. S., Stevens, J. N., & Gertz, M. (2020). Economic anxieties, fear of crime, and punitive attitudes in Latin America. Punishment & Society, 22(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474519873659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sozzo, M. (2018). Beyond the ‘neo-liberal penality thesis’? Punitive turn and political change in south america (K. Carrington, R. Hogg, J. Scott, & M. Sozzo, Eds., pp. 659–685). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_32
   Google Scholar
• Spiranovic, C. A., Roberts, L. D., & Indermaur, D. (2012). What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 19(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2011.561766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, E. A., Mears, D. P., Warren, P. Y., Baumer, E. P., & Arnio, A. N. (2018). Lynchings, racial threat, and whites’ punitive views toward blacks. Criminology, 56(3), 455–480. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/crim56&i=455 https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review, 31(2), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida, C. D., Swatt, M. L., Solomon, S. E., & Varano, S. (2013). Neighborhoods and crime: Collective efficacy and social cohesion in Miami-Dade county. Justice & Security Strategies, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Global study on homicide. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
   Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2009). Empathetic identification and punitiveness: A middle-range theory of individual differences. Theoretical Criminology, 13(3), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480609336495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). The social sources of americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology, 48(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00181.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, A. T. (2003). Comparative criminology: Content or simply methodology? (pp. 179–212). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, A. T., Ksinan, A. J., & Javakhishvili, M. (2021). Problems of cross-cultural criminology no more! Testing two central tenets of self-control theory across 28 nations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 75, 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41(3), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viney, W., Waldman, D. A., & Barchilon, J. (1982). Attitudes toward punishment in relation to beliefs in free will and determinism. Human Relations, 35(11), 939–949. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678203501101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, A. (1998). Penal theories. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiff/detail.action?docID=431331
   Google Scholar
• Vuk, M., Applegate, B. K., Ouellette, H. M., Bolin, R. M., & Aizpurua, E. (2020). The pragmatic public? The impact of practical concerns on support for punitive and rehabilitative prison policies. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-019-09507-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. T., Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2015). Disentangling self-control from its elements: A Bifactor analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(4), 595–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9241-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar