The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview

References

• Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1990). Spoken and written recall of visual narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29 (5), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouriga, S., & Olive, T. (2021). Is typewriting more resources-demanding than handwriting in undergraduate students? Reading and Writing, 34(9), 2227–2255. 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10137-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, P., P, R., Cutler, B. L. & Fisher, (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5(1–2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelo, A. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Cadavid, S. (2019). Exploring the role of context on the existing evidence for reconsolidation of episodic memory. Memory (Hove, England), 27(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1507040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centofanti, A. T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(6), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600558394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X441891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fragata, F. (Diretor). (2004). Sorte Nula [Filme]. Virtual AudioVisuais.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(4), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Horry, R., Drain, T., & Hughes, C. (2022). Examining the efficacy of a digital version of the Self-Administered Interview. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 5, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100159
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawrylowicz, J., Memon, A., & Scoboria, A. (2014). Equipping witnesses with transferable skills: The Self-Administered Interview. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(4), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.777961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police and Science Administration, 12, 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittins, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Sharpe, L. (2015). How does immediate recall of a stressful event affect psychological response to it? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 46(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.07.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the Self-Administered Interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horry, R., Hughes, C., Sharma, A., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the self-administered Interview©: Quantity and accuracy of details reported on initial and subsequent retrieval attempts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (2007). Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent? The American Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krix, A. C., Sauerland, M., Merckelbach, H., Gabbert, F., & Hope, L. (2015). How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory ? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.1003219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, J. (1977). On the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 12(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. L., & Paterson, H. M. (2015). How does timing of recall affect eyewitness memory and psychological distress? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(4), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-014-9156-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maras, K. L., Mulcahy, S., Memon, A., Picariello, F., & Bowler, D. M. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of the self-administered interview© for witnesses with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 693–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo, K., & Miura, H. (2017). Effectiveness of the self-administered interview and drawing pictures for eliciting eyewitness memories. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(5), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1254587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPhee, I., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2014). The power of the spoken word: Can spoken-recall enhance eyewitness evidence? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(4), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.848001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura, H., & Matsuo, K. (2021). Does writing enhance recall and memory consolidation? Revealing the factor of effectiveness of the self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(5), 1338–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naka, M. (1998). Repeated writing facilitates children’s memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Eijkemans, H., & Kemp, R. I. (2015). Investigating the impact of delayed administration on the efficacy of the self-administered interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.947670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(8), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo, R., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2013). The enhanced cognitive interview: Towards a better use and understanding of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2013.15.3.311
   Google Scholar
• Paulo, R., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2014). A Entrevista Cognitiva Melhorada: Pressupostos teóricos, investigação e aplicação. PSICOLOGIA, 28(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.17575/rpsicol.v28i2.639
   Google Scholar
• Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2016). Improving the enhanced cognitive interview with a new interview strategy: Category clustering recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. L. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory (Hove, England), 12(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos af Hjelmsäter, E., Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). The Self-Administered Interview: A means of improving children’s eyewitness performance? Psychology, Crime and Law, 18(10), 897–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.582844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. L. (2011). Written vs. spoken eyewitness accounts: Does modality of testing matter? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29(6), 846–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures : Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuckey, M. R., & Brewer, N. (2003). The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 9(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.9.2.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, E., Paterson, H., & Kemp, R. (2014). The effects of immediate recall on eyewitness accuracy and susceptibility to misinformation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(7), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.854788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar