Effects of questioning styles and defendant’s intellectual disability on the public perceptions of a police interview and guilty verdict

References

• American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (APA). (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (2011). Police interviews with vulnerable adult suspects (Research in Practice Report No.21). Australian Institute of Criminology. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2188699
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Nysse-Carris, K. L., Harris, T., & Tyda, K. (2003). Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022551314668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, A., Westera, N., & Kebbell, M. (2016). Interviewing suspects in Australia and New Zealand. In D. W. Walsh, G. E. Oxburgh, A. D. Redlich, & T. Myklebust (Eds.), International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation: Volume 2, suspects (pp.71–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language. The American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia, L., & Gabbert, F. (2020). Vulnerable suspects in police interviews: Exploring current practice in England and Wales. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410396826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishfader, V. L., Howells, G. N., Katz, R. C., & Teresi, P. S. (1996). Evidential and extralegal factors in juror decisions: Presentation mode, retention, and level of emotionality. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2018). The psychology of false confessions: Forty years of science and practice. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Luke, T. J., & Skerker, M. (2017). Ethical perspectives on interrogation: An analysis of contemporary techniques. In J. Jacob & J. Jackson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of criminal justice (pp. 326–347). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, L. A. (2008). Jurors’ reactions to recanted confessions: Do the defendant’s personal and dispositional characteristics play a role? Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(6), 565–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160801995247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershkowitz, I. (2018). NICHD-protocol investigations of individuals with intellectual disability: A descriptive analysis. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 24(3), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M., & Brimbal, L. (2017). Lay perceptions of interrogation techniques: Identifying the role of belief in a just world and right wing authoritarianism. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(3), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maras, K. L., & Wilcock, R. (2013). Suggestibility in vulnerable groups: Witnesses with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and older people. In A. M. Ridley, F. Gabbert, & D. J. La Rooy (Eds.), Suggestibility in legal contexts: Psychological research and forensic implication (pp. 149–170). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2014). Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindthoff, A., Evans, J. R., Perez, G., Woestehoff, S. A., Olaguez, A. P., Klemfuss, J. Z., Normile, C. J., Scherr, K. C., Carlucci, M. E., Carol, R. N., Meissner, C. A., Michael, S. W., Russano, M. B., Stocks, E. L., Vallano, J. P., & Woody, W. D. (2018). A survey of potential jurors’ perceptions of interrogations and confessions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(4), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mindthoff, A., Malloy, L. C., & Höhs, J. M. (2020). Mock jurors’ perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type. Law and Human Behavior, 44(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2022). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Najdowski, C. J., & Bottoms, B. L. (2012). Understanding jurors’ judgments in cases involving juvenile defendants: Effects of confession evidence and intellectual disability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), 297–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najdowski, B. A., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors’ perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(3), 401–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Police Agency (NPA), Japan. (2012). Torishirabe kisohen [Investigative interviewing: Basic manual]. https://www.npa.go.jp/sousa/kikaku/20121213/shiryou.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G. E., Myklebust, T., & Grant, T. (2010). The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B. (2000). Practical guidelines for conducting investigative interviews with Aboriginal people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 12(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2000.12036189
   Google Scholar
• Shaked-Schroer, N., Costanzo, M., & Berger, D. E. (2015). Overlooking coerciveness: The impact of interrogation techniques and guilt corroboration on jurors’ judgments of coerciveness. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Bureau of Japan. (2023). Statistics of Japan 2023. https://www.stat.go.jp/data/nihon/02.html
   Google Scholar
• Wachi, T. (2011). Higishaga chitekisyogaisya dearubaaino torishrabe [Interviewing suspects with intellectually disability]. Sosa kenkyu, 60(8), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wachi, T. (2013). Torishirabe nitaisuru daigakusei no iken [University students’ opinions on interrogations]. Acta Criminologiae et Medicinae Legalis Japonica, 79(2), 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Wachi, T., & Lamb, M. E. (2018). Public opinion about suspect interviewing techniques. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woestehoff, S. A., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar