70
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Institutional dialogue between courts and legislatures in the definition of fundamental rights: lessons from Canada (and elsewhere)

Pages 135-182 | Published online: 30 Oct 2017

References

Australian cases

  • Adelaide Company of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 116
  • Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106
  • Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1
  • Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1
  • Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360
  • Croome v Tasmania (1997) 71 ALJR 430 (HCA)
  • Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 138 ALR 577
  • Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen (1982) 153 CLR 168
  • Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 146 ALR 126
  • Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 145 ALR 96
  • Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455
  • McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140
  • Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273
  • Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1
  • Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104

Canadian cases

UK cases

  • A-G v DeKeyser's Royal Hotel [1920] AC 508 (HL) Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75 (HL)

US cases

Australian legislation

Canadian legislation

  • Alberta Bill of Rights 1972 (Alberta)
  • An Act Respecting the Constitution Act 1982 (Quebec)
  • An Act to amend the Charter of the French Language 1988 (Quebec)
  • An Act to Amend the Charter of the French Language 1993 (Quebec)
  • An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Production of records in sexual offence proceedings) 1997 (Canada)
  • An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Self-induced intoxication) 1995 (Canada)
  • An Act to amend the Indian Act 1985 (Canada) Canadian Bill of Rights 1960 (Canada)
  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Pt 1 of the Constitution Act 1982, being Sch B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK)
  • Charlottetown Accord, Draft Legal Text (9 October 1992): proposed ss 35.1 and following of the Constitution Act 1982
  • Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms 1975 (Quebec)
  • Constitution Act 1867 (UK)
  • Constitution Act 1982, being Sch B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK)
  • Department of Justice Act 1985 (Canada)
  • Individual's Rights Protection Act 1986 (Alberta)
  • The Language Act 1988 (Saskatchewan)
  • Land Planning Act 1982 (Yukon)
  • Languages Act 1988 (Alberta)
  • Marriage Amendment Act 2000 (Alberta)
  • SGEU Dispute Settlement Act 1984-85-86 (Saskatchewan)

German legislation

Indian legislation

Irish legislation

New Zealand legislation

South African legislation

UK legislation

US legislation

International legal material

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 23 March 1976, 999 UNTS 171
  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 3 January 1976, 993 UNTS 3
  • Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 4 November 1950, ETS No. 5
  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 4 January 1969, 660 UNTS 211
  • ILO Convention No. 87 concerning Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise 4 July 1950, 68 UNTS 17
  • Lovelace v Canada Communication No 24/1977 (30 July 1981) UN Doc CCPR/C/OP/1 at 83 (1984)
  • Toonen v Australia Communication No 488/1992 (4 April 1994) UN Doc CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992

Books and articles

  • Allan J ‘Turning Clark Kent into Superman: The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990’ (2000) 9 Otago Law Review at 613–632
  • Bhardwaj R (ed) Constitution Amendment in India 6th ed Northern Book Centre, New Delhi 1995
  • Brennan F The Wik Debate: Its Impact on Aborigines, Pastoralists and Miners UNSW Press, Sydney 1998
  • Cameron J ‘Dialogue and hierarchy in Charter interpretation: A comment on R v Mills’ (2001) 38 Alberta Law Review at 1051–1068
  • Dicey A V Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 10th ed Macmillan, London 1959
  • Hiebert J ‘A hybrid approach to protect rights? An argument in favour of supplementing Canadian judicial review with Australia's model of parliamentary scrutiny’ (1998) 26 Federal Law Review at 115–138
  • Hiebert J ‘Why must a Bill of Rights be a contest of political and judicial wills? The Canadian alternative’ (1999) 10 Public Law Review at 22–36
  • Hiebert J ‘Wrestling with rights: Judges, parliament and the making of social policy’ (1999) 5(3) Choices (Institute for Research on Public Policy) at 1–36
  • Hiebert J Charter Conflicts: What is Parliament's Role? McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal 2002
  • Hogg P Constitutional Law of Canada (3rd ed) Carswell, Scarborough 1992
  • Hogg P and Bushell A ‘The Charter dialogue between courts and legislatures (or perhaps the Charter Of Rights isn't such a bad thing after all)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 75–124
  • Hogg P and Thornton A ‘Reply to ‘Six degrees of dialogue’’ (1999) 37 Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 529–536
  • Kahana T ‘The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter’ (2001) 44 Canadian Public Administration at 255–291
  • Keith K ‘‘Concerning change”: The adoption and implementation of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990’ (2000) 31 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review at 721–746
  • Kinley D The European Convention on Human Rights: Compliance Without Incorporation Dartmouth, Aldershot 1993
  • Macdonald R ‘The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: How far does it or should it stretch?’ (1993) Proceedings of the New Zealand Law Conference
  • Mandel M The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada (revised ed) Thompson Educational Publishing, Toronto 1994
  • Manfredi C and Kelly J ‘Six degrees of dialogue: A response to Hogg and Bushell’ (1999) 37 Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 513–536
  • Petter A ‘Twenty years of Charter justification: From liberal legalism to dubious dialogue’ (2003) 52 University of New Brunswick Law Journal forthcoming
  • Roach K The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue Irwin Law, Toronto 2001
  • Romanow R, Whyte J and Leeson H Canada… Notwithstanding: The Making of the Constitution 1976–1982 Carswell/Methuen, Toronto 1984
  • Russell P ‘Standing up for notwithstanding’ (1991) 29 Alberta Law Review at 293–309
  • Sadurski (ed) Constitutional Justice East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002
  • Simpson B In the Highest Degree Odious: Detention Without Trial in Wartime Britain Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994
  • Slattery B ‘A theory of the Charter’ (1987) 25 Osgoode Hall Law Journal at 701–747
  • Tarnopolsky W The Canadian Bill of Rights (2nd ed) McClelland and Stewart, Toronto 1975
  • Tribe L American Constitutional Law (3rd ed) Foundation Press, New York 2000
  • Tushnet M ‘Policy distortion and democratic debilitation: Comparative illumination of the countermajoritarian difficulty’ (1995) 94 Michigan Law Review at 245–301
  • Webber J ‘Tales of the unexpected: Intended and unintended consequences of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ (1993) 5 Canterbury Law Review at 207–234
  • Webber J Reimagining Canada: Language, Culture, Community, and the Canadian Constitution McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal 1994
  • Webber J ‘Constitutional poetry: The tension between symbolic and functional aims in constitutional reform’ (1999) 21 Sydney Law Review at 260–277
  • Webber J ‘Constitutional reticence’ (2000) 25 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy at 125–155
  • Webber J ‘Beyond regret: Mabo's implications for Australian constitutionalism’ in D Ivison, P Patton and W Sanders (eds) Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000 pp 60–88
  • Weiler P ‘Rights and judges in a democracy: A new Canadian version’ (1984) 18 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at 51–92
  • Winterton G ‘Can the Commonwealth Parliament enact ‘manner and form’ legislation?’ (1980) 11 Federal Law Review at 167–202
  • Zines L The High Court and the Constitution (4th ed) Butterworths, Sydney 1997

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.