231
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Neoliberal welfare reform and ‘rights’ compliance under Australian social security law

Pages 223-253 | Published online: 30 Oct 2017

References

Australian cases

  • Green v Daniels (1977) 13 ALR 1
  • Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273
  • Re Ezekiel and Director-General of Social Services (1984) 6 ALN N235
  • Re Higgins and Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) AATA 9232 (Blow DP)
  • Re Jonkers and Department of Family and Community Services (unreported, 12 May 1999, AATA 99/0311, Christie M)
  • Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502
  • Re Mokcfsi and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (1999) 55 ALD 605 (Handley SM, Barber M)
  • Re Reine and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (2005) AATA 435 (Forgie DP)
  • Re Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services and Vu [2001] AATA 706; (2001) 65 ALD 499; 33 AAR 402; 4(11) SSR 127
  • Re Secretary, Department of Social Security and Chin (1998) 52 ALD 337; 27 AAR 1 (Barnett DP; Billings and Weerasooriya M)
  • Re Secretary, Department of Social Security and Clemson (1991) 14 AAR 261; 63 SSR 888 (Johnston DP)
  • Re Secretary, Department of Social Security and Dagher (1997) 50 ALD 258; 2(12) SSR 163; ATA 12329
  • Re Secretary, Department of Social Security and Kumar (1992) 26 ALD 530
  • Re Secretary, Department of Social Security and Underwood (1991) 25 ALD 343; 15 AAR 81
  • Secretary, Department of Social Security v Chin (1999) 56 ALD 682; 3(11) SSR (Nicholson J)
  • Secretary, Department of Social Security v Clemson (1993) 40 FCR 9; 17 AAR 68; 71 SSR 1030

Other references

  • ACOSS (Australian Council of Social Service) (2000) Social Security Breaches: Penalising the Most Disadvantaged ACOSS, Sydney
  • ACOSS (2001) Breaching the Safety Net: The Harsh Impact of Social Security Penalties ACOSS, Sydney
  • ACOSS (2002) Joint Statement by Peak Disability and Community Groups: Change in Direction Needed on Welfare Reform
  • Allars M (1995) ‘One small step for legal doctrine, one giant leap towards integrity in government: Teoh's case and the internationalisation of administrative law’ 17 Sydney Law Review pp 204–41
  • ARC (Administrative Review Council) (1995) Better Decisions: Review of Commonwealth Merits Review Tribunals Administrative Review Council, Canberra
  • Bailey P (1997) ‘Right to an adequate standard of living: new issues for Australian law’ 4(1) Australian Journal of Human Rights pp 25–50
  • Beer A and Forster C (2002) ‘Global restructuring, the welfare state and urban programmes: federal policies and inequality within Australian cities’ 10(1) European Planning Studies pp 7–25
  • Beeson M and Firth A (1998) ‘Neoliberalism as a political rationality: Australian public policy since the 1980s’ 34 Journal of Sociology pp 215–31
  • Bonoli G and Sarfati H (eds) (2002) Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective: Parallel or Converging Tracks? Ashgate, Aldershot
  • Carney T (1991) ‘Disability support pension: towards workforce opportunities or social control?’ 14 University of New South Wales Law Journal pp 220–46
  • Carney T (1994) ‘Client rights and system integrity in the relational state’ in J Disney and L Briggs (eds) Social Security Policy: Issues and Options AGPS, Canberra pp 191–208
  • Carney T (2002) ‘Australia: workers’ welfare state or responsive pragmatism?’ 16 Zeitschrift fur austlandisches und internationales Arbeits- und Sozialrecht pp 360–90
  • Carney T (2003) ‘Disability and social security: compatible or not?’ 9(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights pp 139–72
  • Carney T (2005a) ‘Lessons from Australia's fully privatised labour exchange reform (job network): from ‘rights’ to ‘management”?’ 19(1) Zeitschrift fur austlandisches und internationales Arbeits- und Sozialrecht pp 77–105
  • Carney T (2005b) ‘Not the old way, not the third way, but the OECD/US way?: welfare sanctions and active welfare in Australia’ 12(2) Journal of Social Security Law pp 57–80
  • Carney T (2006a) Social Security Law and Policy Federation Press, Sydney
  • Carney T (2006b) ‘Welfare to work: or work discipline revisited?’ 41(1) Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 27–48
  • Carney T and Hanks P (1986) Australian Social Security Law, Policy and Administration Oxford University Press, Melbourne
  • Carney T and Ramia G (1999) ‘From citizenship to contractualism: the transition from unemployment benefits to employment services in Australia’ 6 Australian Journal of Administrative Law pp 117–39
  • Carney T and Ramia G (2002) From Rights to Management: Contract, New Public Management and Employment Services Kluwer Law International, Dordrecht
  • Carpenter M (2000) ‘It's a small world’: mental health policy under welfare capitalism since 1945’ 22(5) Sociology of Health & Illness pp 602–20
  • Castles F (1985) The Working Class and Welfare: Reflections on the Political Development of the Welfare State in Australia and New Zealand, 1890–1980 Allen & Unwin, Sydney
  • Castles F (1994) ‘The wage earners’ welfare state revisited: refurbishing the established model of Australian social protection, 1983–93’ 29 Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 120–45
  • Charlesworth H (1993) ‘The Australian reluctance about rights’ 31 Osgoode Hall Law Journal pp 195–232
  • Charlesworth H (2002) ‘International law and Australian law in the 21st century’ 6(1) Newcastle Law Review pp 1–15
  • Charlesworth H (2005) ‘Human rights and statutory interpretation’ in S Corcoran and S Bottomley (eds) Interpreting Statutes Federation Press, Sydney ch 6, pp 100–17
  • Charlesworth H, Chiam M, Hovell D and Williams G (2003) ‘Deep anxieties: Australia and the international legal order’ 25 Sydney Law Review pp 423–65
  • Considine M (1999) ‘Markets, networks and the new welfare state: employment assistance reforms in Australia’ 28 Journal of Social Policy pp 183–203
  • Considine M (2000) ‘Selling the unemployed: the performance of bureaucracies, firms and non-profits in the new Australian ‘market’ for unemployment assistance’ 34 Social Policy and Administration pp 274–95
  • Considine M (2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (2002) Job Network Evaluation: Stage 3 Effectiveness Report Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra
  • Dixon J and Hyde M (2000) ‘A global perspective on social security programmes for disabled people’ 15 Disability and Society pp 709–30
  • Eardley T, Abello D and Macdonald H (2001) Is the Job Network Benefitting Disadvantaged Job Seekers?: Preliminary Evidence from a Study of Non-Profit Employment Services Social Policy Research Centre, Sydney
  • ESCR Committee (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) (1991) Revised General Guidelines Regarding the Form and Contents of Reports to be Submitted by States Parties under Articles 16 and 17 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights E/C.12/1991/1
  • ESCR Committee (2000) Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Australia (2000) E/C.12/1/Add.50
  • ESCR Committee (2006) ‘Draft General Comment on Art 9 of the ICESCR’ [Online] Available: <www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/discussion.htm> [2006, June 12]
  • Fleischmann B (1990) ‘A cultural historian's reading of Charles Reich's impact on the contemporary discourse on ‘welfare”’ 31 William and Mary Law Review pp 307–20
  • Froehlic M (1985) ‘Administrative non-acquiescence in judicial decisions’ 53 George Washington Law Review pp 147–67
  • Gardner J (1995) ‘The Social Security Appeals Tribunal: 20 years of evolution’ 20 Alternative Law Journal pp 242–46
  • Gleeson B (1998) ‘Disability and poverty’ in R Fincher and J Nieuwenhuysen (eds) Australian Poverty: Then and Now Melbourne University Press, Melbourne pp 314–33
  • Goodin R (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  • Goodin R (2001) ‘False principles of welfare reform’ 36(3) Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 189–205
  • Hanagan M (1997) ‘Citizenship, claim-making and the right to work: Britain, 1884–1911’ 26(4) Theory and Society pp 449–74
  • Handler J (1997) ‘Welfare reform in the United States’ 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal pp 289–307
  • Handler J (2002a) Myth and Ceremony in Workfare: Rights, Contracts and Client Satisfaction UCLA, School of Law Research Paper No 02–21, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Handler J (2002b) ‘Social citizenship and workfare in the US and western Europe: from status to contract’, paper delivered at the conference Canadian Law and Society Association and the Law and Society Association (30 May-1 June 2002), Vancouver, Canada
  • Handler J F (2004) Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: The Paradox of Inclusion Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  • Hartman Y (2005) ‘In bed with the enemy: some ideas on the connections between neoliberalism and the welfare state’ 53(1) Current Sociology pp 57–73
  • Hasenfeld Y, Ghose T and Larson K (2004) ‘The logic of sanctioning welfare recipients: an empirical assessment’ 78(2) Social Service Review pp 304–19
  • Hudson A (2002) ‘Dangerous potential: streamlining the United Nations human rights committees’ 8(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights pp 55–78
  • Iding L (2003) ‘In a poor state: the long road to human rights protection on the basis of social condition’ 41 Alberta Law Review pp 513–25
  • Jamrozik A (1994) ‘From harvester to de-regulation: wage earners in the Australian welfare state’ 29 Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 162–69
  • Jayasuriya K (2000) ‘Capability, freedom and the new social democracy’ 71 The Political Quarterly pp 282–99
  • Jayasuriya K (2001) ‘Agency, autonomy and the new contractualism’ 18 Law in Context pp 57–78
  • Jones M and Basser Marks L (1999) ‘Disability, rights and law in Australia’ in M Jones and L Basser Marks (eds) Disability, Divers-Ability and Legal Change Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague pp 189–208
  • Kelly P (1992) The End of Certainty Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, NSW
  • Kinnear P (2002) ‘Mutual obligation: a reasonable policy?’ in T Eardley and E Bradbury (eds) Competing Visions: Refereed Proceedings of the National Social Policy Conference 2001 Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney pp 248–63
  • Koller S (1997) ‘Unequal treatment for newly arrived migrants under the Social Security Act’ 4 Australian Journal of Human Rights pp 169–74
  • Koutnatzis S (2005) ‘Social rights as a constitutional compromise: lessons from comparative experience’ 44 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law pp 74–133
  • Lacey W (2001) ‘In the wake of Teoh: finding an appropriate government response’ 29 Federal Law Review pp 219–40
  • Lacey W (2004) ‘A prelude to the demise of Teoh: the High Court decision in Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam’ 26(1) Sydney Law Review pp 131–56
  • Lynch P (2005) ‘Understanding and responding to begging’ 29 Melbourne University Law Review pp 518–55
  • Macintyre C (1999) ‘From entitlement to obligation in the Australian welfare state’ 34 Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 103–18
  • Macklem P (2006) Social Rights in Canada Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Toronto
  • Maher L (1994) ‘The Australian experiment in merits review tribunals’ 1994 Law in Context pp 73–106
  • Maranville D (1986) ‘Non-acquiescence: outlaw agencies, imperial courts and the perils of pluralism’ 39 Vanderbilt Law Review pp 471–538
  • Mendes P (1999) ‘From the wage earners welfare state to the targeted welfare state: the social welfare policies of the Australian Labor Party, 1983–99’ 52 Australian Social Work pp 33–38
  • Meng W (2004) ‘International labor standards and international trade law’ in E Benvenisti and G Nolte (eds) The Welfare State, Globalization, and International Law Springer-Verlag, Berlin pp 371–94
  • Moss J (2000) ‘The ethics and politics of mutual obligation’ 35(1) Australian Journal of Social Issues pp 1–14
  • O'Connor D (1993) ‘Effective administrative review: an analysis of two-tier review’ 1 Australian Journal of Administrative Law pp 4–12
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2001) Innovations in Labour Market Policies: The Australian Way OECD, Paris
  • Otto D and Wiseman D (2001) ‘In search of ‘effective remedies”: applying the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to Australia’ 7(1) Australian Journal of Human Rights pp 5–46
  • Parker S (2006) ‘International justice: the United Nations, human rights and disability’ 22(1) Journal of Comparative Social Welfare pp 63–78
  • Peetz D (2006) Brave New Workplace: How Individual Contracts Are Changing Our Jobs Allen & Unwin, Sydney
  • Piotrowicz R and Kaye S (2000) Human Rights in International and Australian Law Butterworths, Sydney
  • Potter J (1992) ‘Adjudication by social security appeals tribunals: a research study’ 21 Anglo-American Law Review pp 341–71
  • Productivity Commission (2002) Independent Review of job Network, Report No 21 AusInfo, Canberra
  • Ramia G and Carney T (2001) ‘Contractualism, managerialism and welfare: the Australian experiment with a marketised employment services network’ 29 Policy and Politics pp 59–80
  • Ramia G and Wailes N (2006) ‘Putting wage-earners into wage-earners’ welfare states: the relationship between social policy and industrial relations in Australia and New Zealand’ 41(1) Australian journal of Social Issues pp 49–68
  • Rees N (2002) ‘International human rights obligations and mental health review tribunals’, paper delivered at the conference Detention, Decisions and Dilemmas: Reviewing Involuntary Detention and Treatment into the 21st Century (18 October 2002), Melbourne
  • Reich C (1964) ‘The new property’ 73 Yale Law journal pp 733–87
  • Ronalds C (1998) Discrimination Law and Practice Federation Press, Sydney
  • Rowlands D (1999) ‘Institutional change in the APS: the case of DSS and Centrelink’ 1 Australian Social Policy pp 183–201
  • Sadurski W (2002) ‘Enduring and empowering: the Bill of Rights in the third millennium: postcommunist charters of rights in Europe and the US Bill of Rights’ 65 Law & Contemporary Problems pp 223–50
  • Senate (2005) Employment and Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Welfare to Work and Other Measures) Bill 2005 Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee, Canberra
  • Simon W (1985) ‘The invention and reinvention of welfare rights’ 44 Maryland Law Review pp 1–37
  • Steiner J and Alston P (1996) International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • Stratton K and Delaney J (2000) ‘Reviewing changes to the Child Disability Allowance: giving parents a voice’ 53 Australian Social Work pp 5–11
  • Theodore N and Peck J (2001) ‘Searching for best practice in welfare-to-work: the means, the method and the message’ 29(1) Policy and Politics pp 81–94
  • United Nations Economic and Social Council (1998) Third Periodic Report: Australia. 23/07/98. E/1994/104/Add. 22. (State Party Report) [Online] Available: <www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/E.1994.104.ADD.22.En?Opendocument> [2006, October 13]
  • Vanstone A (2002) ‘Breaching rules change to protect the vulnerable’ [Online] Available: <www.facs.gov.au/internet/minfacs.nsf> [2002, March 30]
  • Watchirs H (2000) Application of Rights Analysis Instrument to Australian Mental Health Legislation Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra
  • Watchirs H and Heesom G (1996) Report on a Rights Analysis Instrument for Use in Evaluating Mental Health Legislation Human Rights Branch, Attorney-General's Department, Canberra
  • Wax A (2003) ‘Social welfare, human dignity and the puzzle of what we owe each other’ 27 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy pp 121–36
  • Wilson L, Stoker R and McGrath D (1999) ‘Welfare bureaus as moral tutors: what do clients learn from paternalistic welfare reforms?’ 80(3) Social Science Quarterly pp 473–86
  • Yeatman A and Owler K (2001) ‘Contractualism, clientage and individualised service delivery’ 18 Law in Context pp 34–56
  • Zanetti C (1998) ‘Managing change: focus on improving service quality and information management’ 57 Australian Journal of Public Administration pp 19–31

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.