References
Australian cases
- Australian Communist Party v Commomuealth (1951) 83 CLR 1
- Broum v R (1913) 17 CLR 570
- Brown v R (1986) 160 CLR 171
- Builders’ Labourers’ Federation of Neiu South Wales v Minister for Industrial Relations(1986) 7 NSWLR 372
- Cheatle v R (1993) 177 CLR 541
- Cheng v R (2000) 203 CLR 248
- Chi Hsing v Rankin (1978) 141 CLR 182
- Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292
- Green v R (1971) 126 CLR 28
- Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51
- Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337
- Kingswell v R (1985) 159 CLR 264
- Leeth v Commonwealth (1992) 174 CLR 455
- Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367
- Murphy v R (1985) 158 CLR 596
- Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Willis (1992) 177 CLR 1
- Polyukovich v Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501
- R v Archdali (1928) 41 CLR 128
- R v Clough 2008] QSC 307
- R v Federal Court of Bankruptcy; Ex Parte Lowenstein (1938) 59 CLR 556
- Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104
- Union Steamship Co of Australia Pty Ltd v R (1988) 166 CLR 1
Australian legislation
- Anti-Terrorism Act (No2) 2005 (Cth)
- Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
- Criminal Code 1899 (Qld)
- Criminal Code and jury and Another Act Amendment Act (2008 (Qld)
- judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)
- juries Act (NT)
- juries Act 1927 (SA)
- juries Act 1957 (WA)
- juries Act 1967 (ACT)
- juries Act 1977 (NSW)
- juries Act 2000 (Vic)
- juries Act 2003 (Tas)
- jury Act 1995 (Qld)
- Terrorism (Preventative Detention) Act 2005 (Qld)
International cases
- Anonymous Case (1367) 41 Lib Ass 11 (translated in A Thayer Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law (1898)
- Apodaca v Oregon (1972) 406 US 404
- Balzac v Porto Rico (1922) 258 US 298
- Barron v Baltimore (1833) 7 Pet 243
- Dr Bonham's Case (1609) 8 Co Rep 107a; 77 ER 638
- Bushell's Case [1670] VR 135
- Duncan v Louisiana (1968) 391 US 145
- Fidelity Mutual Life Association v Mettler (1902) 185 US 308
- Gideon v Wainwright (1963) 372 US 335
- Lilburne's Case (1649)
- Malloy v Hogan (1964) 378 US 1
- Maxwell v Dow (1900) 176 US 581
- Oliver, In re (1948) 333 US 257
- Pointer v Texas (1965) 380 US 400
- Powell v Alabama (1932) 287 US 45
- Powers v Ohio (1991) 499 US 400
- R (MG) [1996] 3 SCR 1296
- R v Pan [2001] 2 SCR 344
- R v Thatcher [1987] 1 SCR 652
- Taylor v Louisiana (1975) 419 US 522
- Victor v Nebraska (1994) 511 US 1
- Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462
International legislation
- Constitution (UK)
- Constitution of the United States of America
Other references
- Baker J, Allen A and Weatherburn D (2002) ‘Hung juries and aborted trials: an analysis of their prevalence, predictors and effects’ Crime and justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Criminal justice No 66 (BOCSAR, Sydney)
- Bates F (1989) ‘Describing the indescribable — evaluating the standard of proof in criminal cases’ 13 Criminal Law journal p 330
- Baylis C (1991) ‘Justice done and justice seen to be done: the public administration of justice’ 21 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review p 177
- Bennett J M (1961) ‘The establishment of jury trial in New South Wales’ 3 Sydney Law Review p 463
- Blackstone W (1876) Commentaries on the Laws of England (vol 4) Clarendon Press, Oxford
- Buckhout R, Weg S, Reilly V and Frohboese R (1977) ‘Jury verdicts: comparison of 6 vs 12 person juries and unanimous vs majority decision rule in a murder trial’ 10 Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society pp 175–78
- Burton Bass A, Davidson Gesser H, and Stephan Mount K (1979) ‘Scientific statistical methodology’ 5 Dalhousie Law journal p 350
- Cameron N, Potter S and Young W (2000) ‘The New Zealand jury: towards reform’ in N Vidmar (ed) World Jury Systems Oxford University Press, New York
- Challinger D (ed) (1986) The jury Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra
- Chesterman M (1999) ‘Criminal jury trials in Australia: from penal colonies to a federal democracy’ 62 Law and Contemporary Problems p 69
- Chikarovski K (2000) New South Wales Parliamentary Debates, 17 August, p 8309
- Cohen L (1980) ‘The logic of proof’ Criminal Law Review p 91
- Constitutional Commission (1987) Report of the Advisory Committee on Individual and Democratic Rights under the Constitution Parliament of Australia
- Coper M (1987) Encounters With the Australian Constitution CCH Australia, Sydney
- Cutler B L and Hughes D M (2001) ‘Judging jury service: results of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts Juror Survey’ 19 Behavioural Sciences and the Law p 305
- Davis J H, Kerr N L, Atkin R S, Holt R and Meek D (1975) ‘The decision processes of 6 and 12 person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules’ 57 journal of Personality and Social Psychology p 1
- De Tocqueville A (1835) Democracy in America Penguin Classics
- Debus B (2005) New South Wales Attorney-General, Media Release, 9 November
- Devlin B (1966) Trial by jury Stevens and Sons Ltd
- Dixon O (1957) ‘The common law as an ultimate constitutional foundation’ 31 Australian Law journal p 240
- Drabsch T (2005) Majority jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials New South Wales Parliamentary Library Research Service, Briefing Paper No 15/05
- Enright S and Morton J (1990) Taking Liberties: The Criminal jury in the 1990s Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
- Evatt H V (1936) 10 Australian Law journal (supp) p 49
- Findlay M and Duff P (eds) (1988) The jury Under Attack Butterworths, Sydney
- Glasser M (1997) ‘Letting the supermajority rule: non-unanimous jury verdicts in criminal trials’ 24 Florida State University Law Review p 659
- Gleesen M (2002) ‘Public confidence in the judiciary’ 76 Australian Law journal p 558
- Goodman-Delahunty J, Brewer N, Clough J, Horan J, Ogloff J, Tait D and Pratley J (2007) Research and Public Policy Series, No 87, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra
- Gray A (2006) ‘Mockery and the right to trial by jury’ 6(1) QUT Law and Justice journal p 66
- Handsley E (1998) ‘Public confidence in the judiciary: a red herring for the separation of judicial power’ 20 Sydney Law Review p 183
- Hans V P, Hannaford-Agor P L, Mott N L and Munsterman G T (2003) ‘The hung jury: the American jury's insight and contemporary understanding’ 39 Criminal Law Bulletin p 33
- Hans V P, Mott N L and Munsterman G T (2002) Are Hung juries a Problem? National Centre for State Courts, Washington
- Harris G (1995) ‘The communitarian function of the criminal jury trial and the rights of the accused’ 74 Nebraska Law Review p 804
- Hastie R, Penrod S and Pennington N (1983) Inside the jury Harvard University Press, Cambridge
- Helmholz R H (1983) ‘The early history of the grand jury and canon law’ 50 University of Chicago Law Review p 613
- Hope J (1996) ‘A constitutional right to a fair trial? implications for the reform of the Australian criminal justice system’ 24 Federal Law Revietv p 173
- House of Lords (1916) Lords Debates 5th Series, Vol 87, 1054
- Johns R Trial by jury: Recent Developments (2005) New South Wales Parliamentary Library Briefing Paper No 4/05
- Jordan S (2002) ‘The criminal trial jury: erosion of jury power’ 5 Howard Scroll Social justice Law Review p 1
- Kalven H and Zeisel H (1966) The American jury Little Brown, Boston
- Kaplan M F and Miller C E (1987) ‘Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule’ 53(2) journal of Personality and Social Psychology p 306
- Kassin S and Wrightsman L (1988) The American jury on Trial: Psychological Perspectives Taylor and Francis, New York
- Kenny S (1999) ‘Maintaining public confidence in the judiciary: a precarious equilibrium 25 Monash University Law Review p 209
- Kerr N L, Atkin R S, Stasser G, Meek D, Holt R W and Davis J H (1976) ‘Guilt beyond reasonable doubt: effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors’ 34 journal of Personality and Social Psychology p 282
- Killey I (1990) ‘Peace, order and good government: a limitation on legislative competence’ 17 Melbourne University Law Review p 24
- Kritzner H M and Voelker J (1998) ‘Familiarity breeds respect: how Wisconsin citizens view their courts’ 82 judicature p 59
- Latane B and Wolf S (1981) ‘The social impact of majorities and minorities’ 88 Psychology Review p 438
- Law Reform Commission of Canada (1980) The jury in Criminal Trials Working Paper 27
- MacCoun (1989) Experimental Resource on Jury Decision Making Rand Corporation, California
- Maher G (1988) ‘The verdict of the jury’ in M Findlay and P Duff (eds) The Jury Under Attack Butterworths, Sydney, p 49
- Maitland F (1968) The Constitutional History of England Cambridge University Press, England
- Matthews R, Hancock L and Briggs D (2004) Jurors’ Perceptions, Understanding, Confidence and Satisfaction in the Jury System: A Study in Six Courts Home Office
- McLachlin B (2003) ‘Courts, transparency and public confidence — to the better administration of justice’ Deakin Law Review p 1
- Miller C E (1985) ‘Group decision making under majority and unanimous decision rules’ 48(1) Social Psychology Quarterly p 51
- Neilson W and Winter H (2005) ‘The elimination of hung juries: retrials and non- unanimous verdicts’ 25 International Review of Law and Economics p 1
- Nemeth C (1977) ‘Interactions between jurors as a function of majority v unanimity decision rules’ 7 Journal of Applied Social Psychology p 38
- Nesson C (1979) ‘Reasonable doubts and permissive inferences: the value of complexity’ 92 Harvard Law Review p 1187
- New South Wales Law Reform Commission (1986) Criminal Procedure Report: The Jury in a Criminal Trial
- New South Wales Law Reform Commission (2005) Majority Verdicts Report 111
- New Zealand Law Commission (1999) Juries in Criminal Trials: Part Two, Preliminary Paper 37(2)
- Queensland Law Reform Commission (1985) On a Bill to Amend and Reform the Jury Act, the Justices Act and the Criminal Code in So Far as Those Acts Relate to Committal Proceedings and Trial by Jury in Criminal Courts Report No 35
- Reichelt J (2007) ‘Standing alone: conformity, coercion and the protection of the holdout juror’ 40 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
- Saks M j (1997) ‘What do jury experiments tell us about how juries (should) make decisions?’ 6 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law journal pp 1–53
- Salmelainen P, Bonney R and Weatherburn D (1997) ‘hung juries and majority verdicts’ Crime and justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and justice BOCSAR, Sydney
- Sandys M and Dillehay R C (1995) ‘First class ballots: predeliberation dispositions and final verdicts in jury trials’ 19 Law and Human Behaviour p 175
- Sankoff P (2006) ‘Majority jury verdicts and the charter of rights and freedoms’ 39 University of British Columbia Law Revieio p 333
- Sasch (1956) ‘Studies of independence and conformity: a minority of one against a unanimous majority’ 70 Psychology Monograph p 1
- Simon R J and Mahan L (1971) ‘Quantifying burdens of proof’ 5 Law and Society Review p 319
- Simpson A and Wood M (2001) ‘A puny thing indeed — Cheng v The Queen and the constitutional right to trial by jury’ 29 Federal Law Review p 95
- Stellios J (2005a) ‘The constitutional jury — a bulwark of liberty?’ 27 Sydney Law Review p 113
- Stellios J (2005b) ‘The High Court's recent encounters with section 80 jury trials’ 29 Criminal Law journal p 139
- Stephen J (1883) A History of the Criminal Law of England 1829–1874 New York
- Tate J et al (1996) ‘Proportionate group size and rejection of the deviate: a meta-analytic integration’ 11 journal of Social Behaviour and Personality p 739
- Thackeray V (2006) ‘Trial by jury: a political analysis’ 30 Criminal Law journal p 275
- Thompson L, Mannix E and Bazerman M (1988) ‘Group negotiation: effects of decision rule, agenda and aspiration’ 54 journal of Personality and Social Psychology p 86
- Wait M (2001) ‘The slumbering sovereign: Sir Owen Dixon's common law constitution revisited’ 29 Federal Laxo Review p 57
- Wheeler F (1997) ‘The doctrine of separation of powers and constitutionally entrenched due process in Australia’ 23 Monash University Law Review p 248
- Williams G (1979) ‘The mathematics of proof Criminal Lazv Review p 297
- Willis J (1985) Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial, discussion paper, New South Wales Law Reform Commission
- Woods G (2007) ‘Public confidence in the judiciary: some historical observations and a proposal’, Confidence in the Courts Conference, Canberra
- Young, Cameron and Timsley (2000) ‘An inside look at jury decision making’ 12 Judicial Officers Bulletin 6.53
- Zines L (1994) ‘A judicially created bill of rights?’ 16 Sydney Law Review p 166