Claiming women’s social and economic rights in Australia

References

International Legal Material

• CAT Committee (Committee Against Torture). 2014. Concluding observations on the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of Australia, December 23. CAT/C/AUS/CO/4-5.
   Google Scholar
• CEDAW Committee (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women). 2010. Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Australia, July 30. CEDAW/C/AUL/CO/7.
   Google Scholar
• CERD (Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination). 2010. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 9 of the Convention – Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: Australia, September 13. CERD/C/AUS/CO/15-17.
   Google Scholar
• CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Right). 2005. General Comment No 16: The equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights (art 3 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). Thirty-fourth session. E/C 12/2005/4.
   Google Scholar
• CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). 2017. Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Australia, July 11. E/C.12/AUS/CO/5.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women 1249 UNTS 13 (adopted 18 December 1979, entered into force 3 September 1981).
   Google Scholar
• Convention on the Rights of the Child 1577 UNTS 3 (adopted 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990).
   Google Scholar
• CRC Committee (Committee on the Rights of the Child). 2012b. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 44 of the Convention – Concluding observations: Australia, August 28. CRC/C/AUS/CO/4
   Google Scholar
• CRPD Committee (Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). 2013b. Concluding observations on the initial report of Australia, September 2–13. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• HRC (Human Rights Committee). 2009. Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant – Concluding Observations Of The Human Rights Committee: Australia, May 7. CCPR/C/AUS/CO/5.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Joy Ngozi Ezeilo – Addendum: Mission to Australia, May 18. A/HRC/20/18/Add.1.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. 2016. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Australia, January 13. A/HRC/31/14.
   Google Scholar
• International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 660 UNTS 195 (adopted 21 December 1965, entered into force 4 January 1969).
   Google Scholar
• International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families 2220 UNTS 3 (adopted 18 December 1990, entered into force 1 July 2003).
   Google Scholar
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 999 UNTS 171 (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976).
   Google Scholar
• International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 993 UNTS 3 (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization Domestic Workers Convention 2011 (No. 189).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization Maternity Protection Convention (Revised) 1952 (No. 103).
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention 1952 (No. 102).
   Google Scholar
• Optional Protocol to the ICESCR. 2009. 869 UNTS 34 (adopted by the General Assembly on 10 December 2008, entered into force on 10 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. 2016. Human Rights Council, Thirty-second session, April 28. A/HRC/32/31.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples. 2010. Human Rights Council, Fifteenth session, March 4. A/HRC/15/37/Add.4.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children. 2016. Human Rights Council, Twentieth session, May 18. A/HRC/20/18/Add.1.
   Google Scholar
• Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. 1993. Adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna on 25 June 1993. A/CONF.157/23.
   Google Scholar
• Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice. 2014. Thematic Report on Discrimination against Women in Economic and Social Life with a Focus on Economic Crisis: Annotated Version. Human Rights Council, Twenty-sixth session. A/HRC/26/39.
   Google Scholar

Other References

• ACOSS (Australian Council of Social Service). 2016a. Australia’s leading community groups join with ACOSS to oppose cuts to social security payments, September 12. http://www.acoss.org.au/media_release/australias-leading-community-groups-join-with-acoss-to-oppose-cuts-to-social-security-payments.
   Google Scholar
• ACOSS (Australian Council of Social Service). 2016b. Poverty in Australia 2016. Sydney: ACOSS.
   Google Scholar
• AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission). 2017. Information concerning Australia’s compliance with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Submission by the Australian Human Rights Commission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Sydney: AHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. 2016. Rethinking the Australian model of promoting gender equality. In The public law of gender: From the local to the global, eds. K. Rubenstein, and K.G. Young, 391–412. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, G., and S. Day, 2002. Beyond the social and economic rights debate: Substantive equality speaks to poverty. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14, no. 1: 184–219.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, G., and S. Day. 2005. Denial of the means of subsistence as an equality violation. Acta Juridica 2005: 149–70.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, A., 2010. Second-class rights yet again? Economic, social and cultural rights in the report of the national human rights consultation. University of New South Wales Law Journal 33, no. 1: 193–238.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, H. 2011. Talking to ourselves? Feminist scholarship in international law. In Feminist perspectives on contemporary international law: Between resistance and compliance? eds. S. Kouvo, and Z. Pearson, 17–32. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chinkin, C. 2016. Gender and economic, social and cultural rights. In Economic, social and cultural rights in international law: Contemporary issues and challenges, eds. E. Riedel, G. Giacca, and C. Golay, 134–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E. 2011. Evidence-free policy making? The case of income management. Journal of Indigenous Policy 12: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, L., and J.E. Brown. 2017. Feeling rushed: Gendered time quality, work hours, nonstandard work schedules, and spousal crossover. Journal of Marriage and Family 79, no. 1: 225–42. doi:10.1111/jomf.2017.79.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B., and A. Hochschild, eds. 2003. Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. 2002. Gender justice, human rights, and neoliberal economic policies. In Gender justice, development and rights, eds. M. Molyneux, and S. Razavi, 78–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farha, L. 2008. Committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: Women claiming economic, social and cultural rights – The CEDAW potential. In Social rights jurisprudence: Emerging trends in international and comparative law, eds. M. Langford, 553–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. 2001. The invisible heart – Economics and family values. New York: The Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2008. Scales of justice – Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2013. Between marketization and social protection: Resolving the feminist ambivalence. In Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, eds. N. Fraser, 227–41. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S. 2011. Engendering social and economic rights. In Women’s social and economic rights, eds. B. Goldblatt, and K. McLean, 4–33. Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S., J. Kuosmanen, and M. Campbell. 2016. Transformative equality: Making the sustainable development goals work for women. Ethics and International Affairs 30, no. 2: 177–87. doi:10.1017/S089267941600006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fudge, J. 2011. Global care chains, employment agencies, and the conundrum of jurisdiction: Decent work for domestic workers in Canada. Canadian Journal of Women & Law 23, no. 1: 235–64. doi:10.3138/cjwl.23.1.235
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, B. 2016. Developing the right to social security – A gender perspective. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, B. 2017a. Social (In)security and inequality in Australia: The limited role of human rights in the policy debate. In Law and poverty in Australia: 40 years after the poverty commission, eds. A. Durbach, B. Edgeworth, and V. Sentas, 183–98. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, B. 2017b. Constitutional approaches to gender and social and economic rights. In Constitutions and gender handbook, eds. H. Irving, 482–500. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, B., and K. McLean, eds. 2011. Women’s social and economic rights. Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, B., and L. Lamarche. 2014. Introduction: Interpreting and advancing women’s rights to social security and social protection. In Women’s rights to social security and social protection, eds. B. Goldblatt, and L. Lamarche, 1–15. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Homelessness Australia. 2016. New analysis shows additional $33.8M needed to address domestic violence service gap, September 26. http://www.homelessnessaustralia.org.au/index.php/42-news/125-new-analysis-shows-additional-33-8m-needed-to-address-domestic-violence-service-gap.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C., R. Hirschl, and E. Rosevear. 2014. Economic and social rights in national constitutions. American Journal of Comparative Law 62, no. 4: 1043–98. doi:10.5131/AJCL.2014.0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. 2015. Women workers and the politics of claims-making in a globalizing economy. UNRISD Working Paper 2015-13. Geneva: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Klare, K. 2015. Critical perspectives on social and economic rights, democracy and separation of powers. In Social and economic rights in theory and practice: Critical inquiries, eds. H. Alviar García, K. Klare, and L.A. Williams, 3–22. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, S. 1999. Social citizenship: A precondition for meaningful democracy. Agenda 15, no. 40: 59–65. doi:10.2307/4066019
   Google Scholar
• MacGillivray, P., and E. Baldry, 2015. Australian indigenous women’s offending patterns. Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse. Research Brief 19, no. June: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H. 1959. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFerran, L. 2011. Safe at home, safe at work: National domestic violence and the workplace survey 2011. In Australian domestic and family violence clearinghouse. Sydney: Gendered Violence Research Network, University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, P. 2017. Australia’s welfare wars: The players, the politics and the ideologies. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S.E. 2006. Human rights and gender violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montreal Principles on Women’s Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2004. Human Rights Quarterly 26, no. 3: 760–80. doi:10.1353/hrq.2004.0037
   Google Scholar
• National Human Rights Consultation Committee. 2009. National human rights consultation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2002. Women’s capabilities and social justice. In Gender justice, development and rights, eds. M. Molyneux, and S. Razavi, 45–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, D., 2002. Gender comment: Why does the UN committee on economic, social and cultural rights need a general comment on women? Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14, no. 1: 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, D. 2014. Gendering the right to social security in the era of crisis governance: The need for transformative strategies. In Women’s rights to social security and social protection, eds. B. Goldblatt, and L. Lamarche, 215–38. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., and C. Joseph. 2016. Income trends for selected single parent families. Canberra: ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods.
   Google Scholar
• PJCHR (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights). 2012. Examination of legislation in accordance with the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011: Interim Report – Social Security Legislation Amendment (Fair Incentives to Work) Bill 2012. Fourth Report of 2012, September.
   Google Scholar
• PJCHR (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights). 2013a. Social Security Legislation Amendment (Fair Incentives to Work) Act 2012 Final Report. Fifth Report of 2013, March.
   Google Scholar
• PJCHR (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights). 2013b. Examination of legislation in accordance with the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011: Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Act 2012 and related legislation. Eleventh Report of 2013, June.
   Google Scholar
• PJCHR (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights). 2016a. Human Rights Scrutiny Report. Thirty-seventh report of the 44th Parliament, April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• PJCHR (Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights). 2016b. 2016 Review of Stronger Futures Measures, March.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, P., and C. Deeming. 2011. The impact of the crisis on Australian social security policy in historical perspective. Social Policy & Administration 45, no. 4: 371–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ham, C., and L. Chappell. 2017 (this issue). Democracy and human rights: A tripartite conceptual framework. Australian Journal of Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., 2015. The high court, the constitution and human rights. Australian Journal of Human Rights 21, no. 1: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Women and Poverty: The Challenge for Social and Economic Rights. 2002. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14, no. 1: Special Issue.
   Google Scholar
• WWDA (Women With Disabilities Australia). 2013. Report from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) 10th session - Review of Australia. Tasmania: WWDA.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates, N. 2012. Global care chains: A state of the art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. Global Networks 12, no. 2: 135–54. doi:10.1111/glob.2012.12.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar