‘She was there if I needed to talk or to try and get my point across’: specialist advocacy for parents with intellectual disability in the Australian child protection system

References

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). 2017. Child protection Australia: 2015–16. Child Welfare series no. 66. Cat. no. CWS 60. Canberra, Australia: AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., J. Dixon, G. Wistow., and M. Knapp. 2013. Investing in advocacy interventions for parents with learning disabilities: What is the economic argument? Personal Social Services Research Unit Discussion Paper 2860. www.pssru.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Belksy, J. 1984. The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development 55, no. 1: 83–96. doi:10.2307/1129836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T., D. McConnell, and W. Booth. 2006. Temporal discrimination and parents with learning difficulties in the child protection system. British Journal of Social Work 36: 997–1015. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, T., and W. Booth. 1995. Unto us a child is born: The trials and rewards of parenthood for people with learning difficulties. Australia and NZ Journal of Developmental Disabilities 20, no. 1: 25–39. doi:10.1080/07263869500035411.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, T., W. Booth, and D. McConnell. 2005. The prevalence and outcomes of care proceedings involving parents with intellectual disabilities in the family courts. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18: 7–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00204.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, W., and T. Booth 2004. A family at risk: Multiple perspectives on parenting and child protection. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32: 9–15. doi:10.1111/bld.2004.32.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In Handbook of research methods in psychology, H. Cooper. ed., 2 vols, 57–71. Washington, DC: APA books.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H., and D. Nicholson. 2007. Parental learning disability and children’s needs: Family experiences and effective practice. London, UK: Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, S., A. Dew, T. Gordon, M. Spencer, and L. Dowse. 2017. Intersectional disadvantage: Exploring differences between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal parents with intellectual disability in the NSW child protection system. Journal of Public Child Welfare. Early Online 21, no. September. doi:10.1080/15548732.2017.1379456.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, S., and G. Llewellyn. 2012. Children of parents with intellectual disability: Facing risks or faring okay? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 37, no. 1: 65–82. doi:10.3109/13668250.2011.648610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2011. National disability strategy 2010–2020. Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Conder, J., B. Mirfin-Veitch, and J. Sanders. 2008. “I’ve got to think of him…”: Relationships between parents with an intellectual disability and foster parents. Developing Practice, Winter, no. 21: 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, B. 2017. Some parents are more equal than others: Discrimination against people with disabilities under adoption law. Laws 6, no. 3: 15. doi:10.3390/laws6030015.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R., B. Stenfert Kroese, and R. Evans. 2015. Solicitors’ experiences of representing parents with intellectual disability in care proceedings: Attitudes, influences and legal processes. Disability & Society 30, no. 2: 284–98. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1005730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., and T. Walsh. 2009. Mothers, domestic violence, and child protection. Violence against Women 16, no. 5: 489–508. doi: 10.1177/1077801210365887.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E., and P. Brigham. 2014. The developmental health of children of parents with intellectual disabilities: Cross sectional study. Research in Developmental Disabilities 35: 917–21. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., C. Fraser, C. Ashley, and P. Ledward. 2011. Advocacy for parents and carers involved with children’s services: Making a difference to working in partnership? Child and Family Social Work 16: 266–75. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00738x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., D. McConnell, and M. Aunos. 2012. Parental cognitive impairment, mental health, and child outcomes in a child protection population. Journal of Mental Health in Intellectual Disabilities 5, no. 1: 66–90. doi:10.1080/19315864.2011.587632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E. 2015. Disabled justice? Access to justice and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 2007. Analysing qualitative data. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S., and K. Dodd. 2014. ‘Normal people can have a child but disability can’t’: The experiences of mothers with mild learning disabilities who have had their children removed. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 42, no. 1: 25–35. doi:10.1111/bld.2014.42.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., B. Stenfert-Kroese, and A. O’Brien. 2015. Child and family social workers’ experiences of working with parents with intellectual disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 9, no. 6: 327–37. doi:10.1108/AMHID-03-2015-0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, E., T. LaLiberte, and K. Hill. 2010. Disability in the termination of parental rights and other child custody statutes. Child Abuse and Neglect 34: 927–34. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley, B., M. Richards, and P. Freeman. 2001. Advice and advocacy for parents in child protection cases- what is happening in current practice? Child and Family Law Quarterly 13, no. 2: 167–95.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, G., and D. McConnell. 2002. Mothers with learning difficulties and their support networks. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46, no. 1: 17–34. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00347.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, G., D. McConnell, and L. Ferronato. 2003. Prevalence and outcomes for parents with disabilities and their children in an Australian court sample. Child Abuse & Neglect 27: 235–51. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00004-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., and G. Llewellyn. 2012. Mothering differently: Narratives of mothers with intellectual disability whose children have been compulsorily removed. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 37: 121–30. doi:10.3109/13668250.2012.673574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., G. Llewellyn, and D. McConnell. 2006. Misconception: The experience of pregnancy for women with intellectual disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8, no. 2: 120–31. doi:10.1080/15017410600774178.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., G. Llewellyn, and D. McConnell. 2008. Active negotiation: Mothers with intellectual disabilities creating their social support networks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 21: 341–50. doi:10.1111/jar.2008.21.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., and G. Llewellyn. 2000. Disability and discrimination in statutory child protection proceedings. Disability and Society 15, no. 6: 883–95. doi:10.1080/713662015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., and G. Llewellyn. 2002. Stereotypes, parents with intellectual disability and child protection. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 24, no. 3: 297–317. doi:10.1080/09649060210161294.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., and H.B. Sigurjonsdottir 2010. Caught in the child protection net. In Parents with intellectual disabilities: Past, present and futures, G. Llewellyn, R. Traustadottir, D. McConnell, and H.B. Sigurjonsdorttir. eds., 171–87. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., M. Feldman, M. Aunos, and N. Prasad. 2011. Parental cognitive impairment and child maltreatment in Canada. Child Abuse and Neglect 35: 621–32. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, J., and L. Waterhouse. 2017. The lady and the pram: Women in child protection. The British Journal of Social Work 47: 1652–68. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. 1973. Labelling the mentally retarded. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2016. Their futures matter: A new approach. Reform directions from the independent review of out-of-home home care in New South Wales. NSW Government. https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0005/387293/FACS_OOHC_Review_161116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, S., and S. Azar. 2012. The effect of parental intellectual disability status on child protection service worker decision-making. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57, no. 12: 1104–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01623.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, N., and J. Cashmore. 2016. Adoption reforms New South Wales style: A comparative look. Australian Journal of Family Law 51, no. 1: 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurjonsdottir, H.B., and J. Rice. 2017. ‘Framed’: Terminating the parenting rights of parents with intellectual disability in Iceland. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 30, no. 3: 543–52. doi:10.1111/jar.12301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, R., and M. Gibson. 2017. Less than human: A qualitative study into the experience of parents involved in the child protection system. Child and Family Social Work 22: 565–74. doi:10.1111/cfs.12270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. 2001. Proceed with caution: The limitations of current parenting capacity assessments. Developing Practice, Winter, no. 1: 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tarleton, B. 2007. Specialist advocacy services for parents with learning disabilities involved in child protection proceedings. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36: 134–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00479.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tarleton, B., L. Ward, and J. Howarth. 2006. Finding the right support. A review of issues and positive practice in supporting parents with learning difficulties and their children. London: Baring Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tarleton, E.J. (2008). Specialist Advocacy services parents with learning disabilities involved in child protection. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36, no. 2:134–139.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.G., D.K. Norman, J.M. Murphy, M. Jellinek, D. Quinn, F.G. Poitrast, and M. Goshko. 1991. Diagnosed intellectual and emotional impairment among parents who seriously mistreat their children: Prevalence, type, and outcome in a court sample. Child Abuse & Neglect 15: 389–401. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90023-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C., and J. Osmond. 2006. Permanency planning in foster care: A research review and guidelines for practitioners. Australian Social Work 59, no. 3: 265–80. doi:10.1080/03124070600833055.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C., J. Osmond, and M. Crawford. 2010. Measuring client satisfaction with child welfare services. Journal of Public Child Welfare 4, no. 1: 77–90. doi:10.1080/15548730903563160.
   Google Scholar
• United Nation General Assembly. 2007. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities : resolution. Adopted by the General Assembly, 24 January 2007, A/RES/61/106.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 1989. Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations Treaty Series 1577: 3.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 2006. Convention on the rights of the disabled person. United Nations. A/RES/61/106.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L. 2010. Supporting parents, supporting families: Changing approaches to parents with intellectual disability. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 4(2): 38–43. doi:10.5042/amhid.2010.0319.
   Google Scholar
• Winnick, B.J. 2009. Therapeutic jurisprudence: Perspectives on dealing with victims of crime. Nova Law Review 33: 535–47.
   Google Scholar
• Women with Disabilities Australia (WWDA). 2016. WWDA position statement 4: sexual and reproductive rights. Hobart, Tasmania: WWDA. http://wwda.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Position_Statement_4_-_Sexual_and_Reproductive_Rights_FINAL_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar