Women, work and global supply chains: the gender-blind nature of Australia’s modern slavery regulatory regime

• Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Crimes Legislation Amendment (Psychoactive Substances and Other Measures) Act 2015 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Passports (Law Enforcement and Security) Act 2005 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Marriage Act 1961 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth).
   Google Scholar
• Modern Slavery Act 2018 (NSW).
   Google Scholar
• Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth).
   Google Scholar

French legislation

• Loi relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre (No. 2017-399), 27 March 2017.
   Google Scholar

UK legislation

• Modern Slavery Act 2015 (UK).
   Google Scholar

International legal material

• Convention to Suppress the Slave Trade and Slavery, 25 September 1926 (entered into force 9 March 1927), 60 LNTS 253.
   Google Scholar
• Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, the Slave Trade, and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, 30 April 1956 (entered into force 30 April 1957).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Trafficking Protocol (Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime), 15 November 2000.
   Google Scholar

Other references

• ActionAid International. 2019. “80% of Garment Workers in Bangladesh Have Experienced or Witnessed Sexual Violence and Harassment at Work.” ActionAid International, 10 June. https://actionaid.org/news/2019/80-garment-workers-bangladesh-have-experienced-or-witnessed-sexual-violence-and
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee of the Modern Slavery Registry. 2017. Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade for the Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia (Submission No. 9). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=86f94c87-f1cb-4067-8bc2-4a3ee031669f&subId=510388
   Google Scholar
• Allain, Jean. 2008. “The Definition of Slavery in International Law.” Howard Law Journal 52 (2): 239–76.
   Google Scholar
• Allain, Jean. 2017. “Contemporary Slavery and Its Definition in Law.” In Contemporary Slavery: Popular Rhetoric and Political Practice, edited by Annie Bunting and Joel Quirk, 36–66. Toronto: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anti-Slavery Australia. 2017. Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia: Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (Submission No. 156). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=2583cbf7-1390-4ba4-a8ca-61f0c4ca6071&subId=511698
   Google Scholar
• ASOS. 2017. Australian Parliamentary Inquiry into Modern Slavery: ASOS Submission (Submission No. 161). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=b576486f-cf19-48d3-b34b-bccd18f2b84b&subId=511826
   Google Scholar
• Barraja, Magali, and Dominic Kotas. 2018. “Making Supply Chains Work for Women – Why and How Companies Should Drive Gender Equality in Global Supply Chains.” BSR, 19 November. https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/blog-view/gender-equality-global-supply-chains-companies
   Google Scholar
• Barrientos, Stephanie. 2001. “Gender, Flexibility and Global Value Chains.” IDS Bulletin 32 (3): 83–93. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003009.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Michael, and Genevieve Lebaron. 2018. “The UK Modern Slavery Act: Transparency through Disclosure in Global Governance.” E-International Relations, 21 September. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/09/21/the-uk-modern-slavery-act-transparency-through-disclosure-in-global-governance/
   Google Scholar
• Bourke-Martignoni, Joanna, and Elizabeth Umlas. 2018. Gender-Responsive Due Diligence for Business Actors: Human Rights-Based Approaches – Academy Briefing No. 12. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Academy%20Briefing%2012-interactif-V3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Alan. 2012. “Human Rights and the Environment: Where Next?” European Journal of International Law 23 (3): 613–42. doi:10.1093/ejil/chs054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. 2018. “The Gender Lens to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Multi-Stakeholder Asia Consultation.” Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, February 21. https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/the-gender-lens-to-the-un-guiding-principles-on-business-and-human-rights-a-multi-stakeholder-asia-consultation
   Google Scholar
• CEDAW Committee (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women). 1989. General Recommendation No. 9: Statistical Data concerning the Situation of Women. OHCHR. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/1_Global/A_44_38_3724_E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CEDAW Committee. 2017. General Recommendation No. 35 on Gender-based Violence against Women, Updating General Recommendation No. 19. CEDAW/C/GC/35.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, Hilary. 2018. “Human Rights as Men’s Rights.” In Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives, edited by J.S. Peters and Andrea Wolper, 103–13. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collective Shout. 2017. Submission: Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia (Submission No. 80). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=fd641bd1-0de1-4c5c-8ca6-323d5f879504&subId=511503
   Google Scholar
• Crammer, Jake. 2017. Proposal for Australia’s Modern Slavery Act: Implementing Corporate Due Diligence (Submission No. 123). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=f34a08ac-cd63-44b2-a9d5-647b82407a14&subId=511111
   Google Scholar
• Dannecker, Petra. 2000. “Collective Action, Organisation Building, and Leadership: Women Workers in the Garment Sector in Bangladesh.” Gender and Development 8 (3): 31–39. doi:10.1080/741923779.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Margaret. 2017. Asking the Law Question. Sydney: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, Catherine S. 2004. “On Farm and Packhouse: Employment at the Bottom of a Global Value Chain.” Rural Sociology 69 (1): 99–126. doi:10.1526/003601104322919928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, Kathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1177/106591290505800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairtrade Foundation. 2015. Equal Harvest: Removing the Barriers to Women’s Participation in Smallholder Agriculture. London: Fairtrade Foundation. http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/~/media/FairtradeUK/What%20is%20Fairtrade/Documents/Policy%20and%20Research%20documents/Policy%20reports/Equal%20Harvest%20Full%20Report%20v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• George, Erika, Candace Gibson, Rebecca Sewall, and David Wofford. 2017. “Recognizing Women’s Rights at Work: Health and Women Workers in Global Supply Chains.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 35 (1): 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2017. Human Rights Watch Submission to Australia’s Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade: Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia (Submission No. 158). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a9511f6a-5386-4ca5-8108-5a293c3b9eae&subId=511839
   Google Scholar
• Human Trafficking Resource and Assistance Centre. 2017. Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia (Submission No. 103). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=646c0bbd-7753-441c-9c04-94bf2b7b4324&subId=511708
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Conference. 2019. Convention concerning the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the World of Work. International Labour Organisation. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_711570.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Women’s Development Agency. 2017. Untitled Submission (Submission No. 34). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=1e89c149-f3e4-43e8-917a-f6921633da5c&subId=511298
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Katy. 2014. “Women, Mining and Development: An Emerging Research Agenda.” The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2): 329–39. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Standing Committee (Parliament of Australia’s Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade). 2013. Trading Lives: Modern Day Human Trafficking – Inquiry of the Human Rights Sub-Committee. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Standing Committee. 2017a. “Submissions”. Parliament of Australia. Accessed 1 December 2019. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Foreign_Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/ModernSlavery/Submissions
   Google Scholar
• Joint Standing Committee. 2017b. “Terms of Reference”. Parliament of Australia. Accessed 1 December 2019. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Foreign_Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/ModernSlavery/Terms_of_Reference
   Google Scholar
• Joint Standing Committee. 2017c. Hidden in Plain Sight: An Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia. Parliament of Australia. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/committees/reportjnt/024102/toc_pdf/HiddeninPlainSight.pdf;fileType=application/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Annie. 2015. “The UK’s New Slavery Laws Explained: What Do They Mean for Business?” The Guardian, December 14. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/dec/14/modern-slavery-act-explained-business-responsibility-supply-chain
   Google Scholar
• Kempadoo, Kamala. 2015. “The Modern-Day White (Wo)Man’s Burden: Trends in Anti-Trafficking and Anti-Slavery Campaigns.” Journal of Human Trafficking 1 (1): 8–20. doi:10.1080/23322705.2015.1006120.
   Google Scholar
• LexisNexis. 2017. LexisNexis Submission to the Australian Parliamentary Inquiry into Modern Slavery Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (Submission No. 137). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=fde554d5-8dbc-4f72-8cae-d89ef49a7c04&subId=511762
   Google Scholar
• Maertens, Miet, and Johan F.M. Swinnen. 2012. “Gender and Modern Supply Chains in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Studies 48 (10): 1412–30. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.663902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks and Spencer. 2017. M&S Submission into Australian Parliamentary Inquiry into Modern Slavery to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (Submission No. 159). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=57ba6144-1e62-4410-8139-8cd5d7b3bbdd&subId=511843
   Google Scholar
• Mighty Good Group (UK). 2017. Modern Day Slavery Inquiry – Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade: Submission by Mighty Good Undies Group (UK) Ltd (Submission No. 132). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=a21ae78e-4a58-45c8-abac-6cb3a3dc97f9&subId=511218
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Model Australia Coalition. 2017. Untitled Submission (Submission No. 197). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=231e2f73-bb0c-4cf6-968b-e3e87c8b2438&subId=513435
   Google Scholar
• NSW Legislative Council. 2019. Hansard – 19 June 2019 – Proof: Modern Slavery Legislation. Parliament of NSW.https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/Hansard/Pages/HansardResult.aspx#/docid/HANSARD-1820781676-79150
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights). 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. HR/PUB/11/04.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. 2018. Gender-Sensitive Human Rights Due Diligence: 7th UN Forum on Business and Human Rights. OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/Gender/GenderRoundtableDueDiligence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. 2019. “Gender Lens to the UNGPs”. OHCHR. Accessed 1 December 2019. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/GenderLens.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Outland Denim. 2017. Submission to Senate Enquiry on the Australian Modern Slavery Act (Submission No. 210). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=4f980a28-8813-4043-9462-bfd4b2bfe544&subId=561213
   Google Scholar
• Pontes, Maria, and Magali Barraja. 2017. Gender Equality in Codes of Conduct Guidance. BSR. https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Gender_Equality_in_Codes_of_Conduct_Guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prieto-Carrón, Marina. 2008. “Women Workers, Industrialization, Global Supply Chains and Corporate Codes of Conduct.” Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9650-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resurreccion, Bernadette P., and Rebecca Elmhirst, eds. 2012. Gender and Natural Resource Management: Livelihoods, Mobility and Interventions. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sahan, Erinch. 2017. “Women in Global Supply Chains: Campaigning for Change.” In Gender Equality and Responsible Business: Expanding CSR Horizons, edited by Kate Grosser, Maureen A. Kilgour, and Lauren McCarthy. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Scarlet Alliance. 2017. Re: The Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia (Submission No. 175). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=79400145-fd9b-469d-9bc8-d369c2c1d690&subId=512033
   Google Scholar
• Siller, Nicole. 2017. Submission to Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade (Submission No. 64). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=ed9a98ca-3a30-4a90-a957-c0bb4407c27a&subId=510701
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Carol. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Freedom Partnership. 2017. Submission to the Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act (Submission No. 199). Parliament of Australia.https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=3dcb6976-0e1d-4cf8-8872-358742a23f7f&subId=514158
   Google Scholar
• Tom and Mia’s Legacy. 2017. Parliamentary Inquiry into Establishing a Modern Slavery Act in Australia: Submission by Tom & Mia’s Legacy (Submission No. 182). Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=aff2a431-bc80-4f00-af5b-8a3fda120d60&subId=512093
   Google Scholar
• UN Global Compact and UN Women. 2011. Women’s Empowerment Principles: Equality Means Business. UN Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/Resources/WEP_EMB_Booklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vijeyarasa, Ramona. 2015. Sex, Slavery and the Trafficked Woman: Myths and Misconceptions about Trafficking and Its Victims. Farnham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vijeyarasa, Ramona. 2018. “A Move in the Right Direction? The Model Law against Trafficking in Persons and the ILO Operational Indicators.” International Migration 57 (1): 177–91. doi:10.1111/imig.12504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijeyarasa, Ramona. 2019. “A Missed Opportunity: How Australia Failed to Make its Modern Slavery Act a Good Practice Global Example.” Adelaide Law Review 40(3): 857–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijeyarasa, Ramona, and José Bello y Villarino. 2013. “Modern-Day Slavery – A Judicial Catchall for Trafficking, Slavery and Labour Exploitation: A Critique of Tang and Rantsev.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 9 (1): 36–61.
   Google Scholar
• Weissbrodt, David, and Muria Kruger. 2003. “Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights.” American Journal of International Law 97 (4): 901–22. doi:10.2307/3133689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar