473
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Corporate human rights due diligence and assessing risks of sexual violence in large-scale mining operations

ORCID Icon

References

International legal material

  • Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. 1992. General Recommendation No. 19: Violence against Women. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/19.
  • Council of Europe. 2011. Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. CETS No.210. May 11, 2011.
  • Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. GA Res 48/104, UN GAOR, 85th plenary. December 20, 1993.
  • Ertürk, Yakin. 2006. The Due Diligence Standard as a Tool for the Elimination of Violence against Women. Commission on Human Rights. E/CN.4/2006/61. January 20, 2006.
  • European Union. 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 Laying Down Supply Chain Due Diligence Obligations for Union Importers of Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten, their Ores, and Gold Originating from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. European Parliament and Council of Europe.
  • International Court of Justice. 2007. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro).
  • UN Human Rights Council. 2008. Resolution 8/7: Mandate of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/8/7. June 18, 2008.
  • UN Human Rights Council. 2010. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary- General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. UN Doc. A/HRC/14/27. April 9, 2010.
  • UN Human Rights Council. 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework. UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31. March 21, 2011.
  • UN Human Rights Council. 2019. Gender Dimensions of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Report of the Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. UN Doc. A/HRC/41/43. May 23, 2019.
  • Organization of American States. 1994. Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence against Women. June 9, 1994.
  • International Law Commission. 2001. “Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission 2 (2):49.
  • MONUC (United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo). 2004. Report on the conclusions of the Special Investigation into allegations of summary executions and other violations of human rights committed by the FARDC in Kilwa (Province of Katanga) on 15 October 2004.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2016. OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2017. OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement in the Extractive Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Ruggie, John. 2008. Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. Human Rights Council. UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5. April 7, 2008.
  • Šimonović, Dubravka. 2016. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences on her Mission to South Africa. UN Doc. A/HRC/32/42/Add.2. June 14, 2016.

French legislation

  • French Parliament. 2017. Loi n° 2017-399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre (Duty of Vigilance Law).

International case law

  • Velásquez Rodríguez v Honduras. Series C, Case No 4. (1998) (Inter-American Court of Human Rights).

UK case law

  • Guerrero v Monterrico Metals Plc. (2009) EWHC 2475. (UK High Court of Justice).

Canada case law

  • Caal v Hudbay Minerals Inc (Amended Statement of Claim). (2012). (Ontario Superior Court of Justice).

Other references

  • Albin-Lackey, Chris. 2011. Gold’s Costly Dividend: Human Rights Impacts of Papua New Guinea’s Porgera Gold Mine. Human Rights Watch: New York.
  • Autesserre, Séverine. 2012. “Dangerous Tales: Dominant Narratives on the Congo and their Unintended Consequences.” African Affairs 111 (443):202–222.
  • Barrick Gold Corp. 2020. “Human Rights.” https://www.barrick.com/English/sustainability/human-rights/default.aspx
  • BHP. 2020. “Respecting Human Rights.” https://www.bhp.com/our-approach/operating-with-integrity/respecting-human-rights/
  • Bonnitcha, Jonathan, and Robert McCorquodale. 2017. “The Concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 28 (3): 899–919.
  • Bourke-Martignoni, Joanna, and Elizabeth Umlas. 2018. Gender-Responsive Due Diligence for Business Actors: Human Rights-Based Approaches. Geneva: Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights.
  • Buss, Doris. 2018. “Conflict Minerals and Sexual Violence in Central Africa: Troubling Research.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25(4):545–567.
  • Cane, Isabel, Terbish, Amgalan and Bymbasuren Onon. 2014. Mapping Gender Based Violence and Mining Infrastructure in Mongolian Mining Communities. Brisbane: International Mining for Development Centre.
  • Cullen, Holly. 2016. “The Irresistible Rise of Human Rights Due Diligence: Conflict Minerals and beyond.” Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 48:743–780.
  • Danielsen, Katrine. 2019. 10 Dos: A Guide for Governments, Companies and Practitioners to Support Women’s Rights and Mitigate Gender Risks during OECD Due Diligence Implementation. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
  • DCAF (Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces) and ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross). 2018. Addressing Security and Human Rights Challenges in Complex Environments: Toolkit. Geneva.
  • Eftimie, Adriana, Heller, Katherine, and Strongman, John. 2009. Gender Dimensions of the Extractive Industries: Mining for Equity. Edited by The World Bank, Extractive Industries and Development Series. Washington DC: The World Bank.
  • Fasterling, Björn, and Demuijnck, Geert. 2013. “Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.” Journal of Business Ethics 116 (4):799–814.
  • Freeport-McMoran. 2020 “Human Rights—Management of Salient Issues.” https://www.fcx.com/sustainability/people#human.
  • Goldscheid, Julie, and Liebowitz, Debra J. 2015. “Due Diligence and Gender Violence: Parsing its Power and its Perils.” Cornell Int’l LJ 48 (2):301–345.
  • Götzmann, Nora, Kristiansson, Linnea, and Hillenbrand, Julia. 2019. Towards Gender-Responsive implementation of Extractive Industries Projects. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights.
  • Hargreaves, Samantha, and Hamilton, Patricia. n.d. “Extractivism’s Impacts on Women’s Bodies, Sexuality and Autonomy.” In Women, Gender and Extractivism in Africa. WoMin. Edited by Hargreaves, Samantha.
  • Heller, Katherine, and Perks, Rachel. 2013. “Extractive Industries in Fragile Settings Present Opportunities and Risks for Women.” The World Bank, 2 November 2017. http://blogs.worldbank.org/energy/extractive-industries-fragile-settings-present-opportunities-and-risks-women
  • Hessbruegge, Jan Arno. 2003. “The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due diligence in International Law.” NYUJ Int’l. L. & Pol. 36:265.
  • Hill, Christina, Madden, Chris and Collins, Nina. 2017. Guide to Gender Impact Assessment for the Extractive Industries. Melbourne: Oxfam Australia.
  • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. 2015. Indigenous Peoples, Afro-Descendent Communities, and Natural Resources: Human Rights Protection in the Context of Extraction, Exploitation, and Development Activities. Edited by OAS: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
  • International Finance Corporation. 2018. Unlocking Opportunities for Women and Business: A Toolkit of Actions and Strategies for Oil, Gas, and Mining Companies, Tool Suite 3: Women and Community Engagement. Edited by International Finance Corporation. Vol. 3, Toolkit. Washington DC: International Finance Corporation.
  • Jenkins, Katy. 2014. “Women, Mining and Development: An Emerging Research Agenda.” The Extractive Industries and Society 1 (2):329–339.
  • Killick, Nick. 2011. From Red to Green Flags: The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights in High-Risk Countries. London: Institute for Human Rights and Business.
  • Knuckey, Sarah, and Tyler Giannini. 2015. Righting Wrongs? Barrick Gold’s Remedy Mechanism for Sexual Violence in Papua New Guinea: Key Concerns and Lessons Learned. Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic and Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic.
  • Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. 2011. “The Megaproject of Mining: A Feminist Critique.” In Engineering Earth. Edited by Brunn, Stanley. 329–351. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. 2012. “Digging Women: Towards a New Agenda for Feminist Critiques of Mining.” Gender, Place & Culture 19(2):193–212.
  • Landau, Ingrid. 2019. “Human Rights Due Diligence and the Risk of Cosmetic Compliance.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 20:221–247.
  • MacDonald, Ginger Gibson, K Yung, L Chisholm, H Quinn, Lake Babine Nation, and Nak’azdli Whut’en. 2017. Indigenous Communities and Industrial Camps: Promoting Healthy Communities in Settings of Industrial Change. Edited by The Firelight Group. Victoria, BC: The Firelight Group.
  • McBeth, Adam. 2008. “Crushed by an Anvil: A Case Study on Responsibility for Human Rights in the Extractive Sector.” Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. LJ 11:127–166.
  • McCorquodale, Robert, Smit, Lise, Neely, Stuart, and Brooks, Robin. 2017. “Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises.” Business and Human Rights Journal 2 (2):195–224.
  • Meyersfeld, Bonita. 2013. “Business, Human Rights and Gender: A Legal Approach to External and Internal Considerations.” In Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? 193. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nolan, Justine. 2018. “Hardening Soft Law: Are the Emerging Corporate Social Disclosure Laws Capable of Generating Substantive Compliance with Human Rights.” Braz. J. Int’l L. 15:65–83.
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2018. “Mine 2018: Tempting times.” https://www.pwc.com/id/mine-2018
  • RAID (Rights and Accountability in Development). 2016. “Acacia Mining (African Barrick Gold) and North Mara.” http://www.raid-uk.org/content/acacia-mining-african-barrick-gold-and-northmara
  • Redmond, Paul. 2016. “Corporations and Human Rights in a Globalised Economy: Some Implications for the Discipline of Corporate Law.” Australian Journal of Corporate Law 31 (1):3–46.
  • Rio Tinto. 2020. “Human Rights.” https://www.riotinto.com/ourcommitment/human-rights-24289.aspx
  • Ruggie, John Gerard, and Sherman, John F. 2017. “The Concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Reply to Jonathan Bonnitcha and Robert McCorquodale.” European Journal of International Law 28 (3):921–928.
  • Rustad, Siri Aas, Østby, Gudrun, and Nordås, Ragnhild 2016. “Artisanal Mining, Conflict, and Sexual Violence in Eastern DRC.” Extractive Industries and Society 3(2):475–484.
  • Simons, Penelope. 2017. “Unsustainable International Law: Transnational Resource Extraction and Violence against Women.” Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 26:415–434.
  • Simons, Penelope, and Handl, Melisa. 2019. “Relations of Ruling: A Feminist Critique of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Violence against Women in the Context of Resource Extraction.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 31 (1):113–150.
  • UN Women. 2017. “Violence Against Women: Facts Everyone should Know.” https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/infographic/violenceagainstwomen/en/index.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.