Exploring the barriers to freshwater policy implementation in New Zealand

References

• Ansell, C., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Improving Policy Implementation through Collaborative Policymaking.” Policy & Politics 45: 467–486. doi:10.1332/030557317X14972799760260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthington, A. H., J. G. Kennen, E. D. Stein, and J. A. Webb. 2018. “Recent Advances in Environmental Flows Science and Water Management – Innovation in the Anthropocene.” Freshwater Biology 63: 1022–1034. doi:10.1111/fwb.13108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, J. 2010. “Intermediaries as Innovating Actors in the Transition to a Sustainable Energy System.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 4: 86–109.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, M. C., K. Alam, and S. Mushtaq. 2016. “Water Policy Implementation in the State of São Paulo, Brazil: Key Challenges and Opportunities.” Environmental Science & Policy 60: 11–18. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken, L. J., and E. A. Oughton. 2013. “Making Sense of Policy Implementation: The Construction and Uses of Expertise and Evidence in Managing Freshwater Environments.” Environmental Science & Policy 30: 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P., and G. Davis. 1998. The Australian Policy Handbook. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman, P., and G. Davis. 2003. “What Use Is a Policy Cycle? Plenty, if the Aim Is Clear.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62: 98–102. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8500.2003.00342.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbois, M. C., and R. C. de Loë. 2016. “State Roles and Motivations in Collaborative Approaches to Water Governance: A Power Theory-based Analysis.” Geoforum 74: 202–212. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. A., R. Peart, and M. Wright. 2016. Evaluating the Environmental Outcomes of the RMA. Environmental Defence Society. https://www.eds.org.nz/assets/Publications/Evaluating%20the%20Environmental%20Outcomes%20of%20the%20RMA%20Report%20Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bührs, T. 2000. “The Environment and the Role of the State in New Zealand.” In Environmental Planning and Management in New Zealand, edited by P. A. Memon and H. C. Perkins, 27–35. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyne, C. 2015. “Local Government.” In New Zealand Government and Politics, edited by J. Hayward, 190–204. 6th ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., R. Kearns, and R. Le Heron. 1998. “Politics, Potential, and Production: Irrigation and Horticulture in Maungatapere, Northland.” Occasional Paper No.37. Auckland: University of Auckland Department of Geography.
   Google Scholar
• DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., P. L. Marshall, and A. W. McCulloch. 2011. “Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project.” Field Methods 23: 136–155. doi:10.1177/1525822X10388468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. 2014. “Regulating Agricultural Land Use to Manage Water Quality: The Challenges for Science and Policy in Enforcing Limits on Non-point Source Pollution in New Zealand.” Land Use Policy 41: 378–387. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., and M. Robson-Williams. 2018. “Shaping Southland’s Regional Forum: Drawing on Lessons from Elsewhere.” Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Contract Report LC3293. Lincoln, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, R., M. Robson-Williams, G. Nicholas, J. Turner, R. Smith, and G. Diprose. 2018. “Transformation Is ‘Experienced, Not Delivered’: Insights from Grounding the Discourse in Practice to Inform Policy and Theory.” Sustainability 10: 3177. doi:10.3390/su10093177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, S. 2003. “The Policy Cycle: Democratic Process or Rational Paradigm Revisited?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62: 65–70. doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, P. 1994. Privatization of irrigation schemes in New Zealand. Colombo: International Irrigation Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fenemor, A. D., C. Phillips, W. J. Allen, R. G. Young, G. R. Harmsworth, W. B. Bowden, L. Basher, et al. 2011b. “Integrated Catchment Management: Interweaving Social Process and Science Knowledge.” New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45: 313–331. doi:10.1080/00288330.2011.593529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenemor, A. D., D. Neilan, W. Allen, and S. Russell. 2011a. “Improving Water Governance in New Zealand: Stakeholder Views of Catchment Management Processes and Plans.” Policy Quarterly 7: 10–19. doi:10.26686/pq.v7i4.4397.10324-10337.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5: 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, J., and A. Hickling. 2005. Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2011. “The Multi-level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1: 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, B. 2005. Research Interviewing: The Range of Techniques. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, M., and T. Shah. 2014. “From IWRM Back to Integrated Water Resources Management.” International Journal of Water Resources Development 30 (3): 364–376. doi:10.1080/07900627.2013.851521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S., and O. Samarasinghe. 2018. “Sustainably Managing Freshwater Resources.” Ecology and Society 23. doi:10.5751/ES-10233-230244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy, K. J., and B. J. Gleeson. 1996. “Sustainable Management and the Market: The Politics of Planning Reform in New Zealand.” Land Use Policy 13: 197–211. doi:10.1016/0264-8377(96)00001-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2008. Innovative Governance and Regulatory Design: Managing Water Resources (Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0708/137). Lincoln: Landcare Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., and D. Sinclair. 2002. “Partnerships, Management Systems and the Search for Innovative Regulation in the Vehicle Body Shop Industry.” Business Strategy and the Environment 11: 236–253. doi:10.1002/bse.327.
   Google Scholar
• Harmsworth, G., S. Awatere, and M. Robb. 2016. “Indigenous Māori Values and Perspectives to Inform Freshwater Management in Aotearoa-New Zealand.” Ecology and Society 21. doi:10.5751/ES-08804-210409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, C. 2015. “Crafting Collaborative Governance: Water Resources, California’s Delta Plan, and Audited Self-management in New Zealand.” Environmental Law Reporter 45: 10324-10337.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. 2005. “The Policy Cycle: A Model of post-Machiavellian Policy Making?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 64: 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. 2003. “Parliament.” In New Zealand Government and Politics, edited by R. Miller, 77–89. 3rd ed. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. 1986. The Quiet Revolution: Turbulence and Transition in Contemporary New Zealand. Wellington: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, W., and K. Wegrich. 2007. “Theories of the Policy Cycle.” In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, edited by F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, and M. S. Sidney, 43–62. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., and N. Helbig. 2018. “Innovating and Changing the Policy-cycle: Policy-makers Be Prepared!” Government Information Quarterly 35: S99–S105. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, B. 2018. Water Management in New Zealand’s Canterbury Region: A Sustainability Framework. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, B. 2020. “Outcome-based Management for Sustainability.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 38: 1–12. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1711340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., and A. Lenschow. 2010. “Environmental Policy Integration: A State of the Art Review.” Environmental Policy and Governance 20: 147–158. doi:10.1002/eet.539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, I., and B. Biggs. 2009. “Application of the ‘Natural Flow Paradigm’ in a New Zealand Context.” River Research and Applications 25: 1126–1135. doi:10.1002/rra.1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalimullah, N. A., K. M. A. Alam, and M. N. A. Nour. 2012. “New Public Management: Emergence and Principles.” BUP Journal 1: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., M. Kiparsky, and R. Norgaard. 2009. “Collaborative Governance and Adaptive Management: Lessons from California’s CALFED Water Program.” Environmental Science and Policy 12: 631–643. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey, J. 1995. The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment? Auckland: Auckland University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, N. A. 2015. Local government authority and autonomy in Canterbury’s freshwater politics between 1989 and 2010. PhD thesis. Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschke, S., J. Newig, J. Völker, and D. Borchardt. 2017. “Does Problem Complexity Matter for Environmental Policy Delivery? How Public Authorities Address Problems of Water Governance.” Journal of Environmental Management 196: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards A Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and A Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48: 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., A. Hall, and C. Leeuwis. 2009. “Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer?” No. 2009-019. UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., and C. Leeuwis. 2009. “Establishment and Embedding of Innovation Brokers at Different Innovation Systems Levels: Insights from the Dutch Agricultural Sector.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76: 849–860. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAWF (Land and Water Forum). 2017a. “Land and Water Forum Commentary on Implementation of the NPS-FM.” Accessed 3 March 2020. http://www.landandwater.org.nz/includes/download.ashx?ID=148664
   Google Scholar
• LAWF (Land and Water Forum). 2017b. “Land and Water Forum Commentary on MfE’s NPS-FM Implementation Review.” Accessed 3 March 2020. http://www.landandwater.org.nz/includes/download.ashx?ID=148665
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, H. 2013. “Inside the Black Box: The Influence of Government Executive Forces on Environmental Policy Effectiveness in New Zealand.” PhD thesis. Lincoln, New Zealand: Lincoln University.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Social Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42: 599–627. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. 1996. “The Key Informant Technique.” Family Practice 13: 92–97. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.1.92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medema, W., B. McIntosh, and P. Jeffery. 2008. “From Premise to Practice: A Critical Assessment of Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management Approaches in the Water Sector.” Ecology and Society 13. doi:10.5751/ES-02611-130229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2011. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2011. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2014. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2014. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2017a. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2017. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2017b. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management Implementation Review: Horizons-Manawatū-Whanganui. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2017c. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management Implementation Review: Taranaki. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2017d. National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management Implementation Review: National Themes Report. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2019a. Action for Healthy Waterways: A Discussion Document on National Direction for Our Essential Freshwater. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2019b. “Improving Our Resource Management System.” Accessed 3 March 2020. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/rma/improving-our-resource-management-system
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2019c. “Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management.” Accessed 3 March 2020. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Fresh%20water/draft-npsfm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment). 2020. “Draft National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management.” Accessed 26 June 2020. https://www.mfe.govt.nz/fresh-water/national-policy-statement/about-nps#nps2020
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment) and Statistics New Zealand. 2015. New Zealand’s Environmental Reporting Series: Environment Aotearoa 2015. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment and Statistics New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• MfE (Ministry for the Environment) and Statistics New Zealand. 2019. New Zealand’s Environmental Reporting Series: Environment Aotearoa 2019. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment and Statistics New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, G. 2000. Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., R. Aroni, E. Timewell, and L. Alexander. 1990. In-depth Interviewing: Researching People. Melboune, VIC: Longman-Chesire Pty .
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B. 2011. “The Implementation Gap: From Policy to Action.” In Water Innovation Forum: A Competitive and Innovative Agricultural Sector, edited by C. Cunningham, L. Coates, and M. Harris, 56–59. London, Ontario: Lawrence National Centre for Policy and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., W. Medd, S. Guy, and S. Marvin. 2009. “Organising Water: The Hidden Role of Intermediary Work.” Water Alternatives 2: 16–33.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, S., J. Camkin, A. Fenemor, P. L. Tan, J. M. Baptista, M. Ribeiro, R. Schulze, S. Stuart-Hill, C. Spray, and E. Rahmah. 2018. “OECD Principles on Water Governance in Practice: An Assessment of Existing Frameworks in Europe, Asia-Pacific, Africa and Southern America.” Water International 43: 60–89. doi:10.1080/02508060.2018.1402650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Parliament. 2012. Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill 2012. Wellington: New Zealand Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H., P. Frederiksen, H. Saarikoski, A. Rytkönen, and A. Pedersen. 2013. “How Different Institutional Arrangements Promote Integrated River Basin Management. Evidence from the Baltic Sea Region.” Land Use Policy 30: 437–445. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H., P. Frederiksen, H. Saarikoski, A. Rytkönen, and A. Pedersen. 2013. “How Different Institutional Arrangements Promote Integrated River Basin Management. Evidence from the Baltic Sea Region.” Land Use Policy30: 437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.011. 1 30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, B. 2018. “Protection of Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems in Canterbury, New Zealand: The Targeted Stream Augmentation Project.” Sustainable Water Resources Management 4: 291–300. doi:10.1007/s40899-017-0188-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel, N. 2009. “A Critical Account of Policy Implementation Theories: Status and Reconsideration.” Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance 25: 36–54.
   Google Scholar
• PCE (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment). 2018. Overseer and Regulatory Oversight: Models, Uncertainty and Cleaning up Our Waterways. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Peart, R. 2007. The Community Guide to the Resource Management Act 1991. Waitakere City: Environmental Defence Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J., and A. Wildavksy. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahaman, M. M., and O. Varis. 2005. “Integrated Water Resources Management: Evolution, Prospects and Future Challenges.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 1: 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Resource Management Act. 1991. N.Z.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, M. M. 1994. Land and Water: Water and Soil Conservation and Central Government in New Zealand 1941-1988. Wellington: Historical Branch of the Department of Internal Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rouillard, J. J., T. Ball, K. V. Heal, and A. D. Reeves. 2015. “Policy Implementation of Catchment-scale Flood Risk Management: Learning from Scotland and England.” Environmental Science & Policy 50: 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., Ed. 2007. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., W. Frocht, M. Lubell, Z. Tracthenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock, Eds. 2005. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. 11-12 June 2008. “Governance of the Rural Environment: Are Existing Approaches Working?” In Paper presented at the Environment Defence Society Conference – Conflict in paradise: The transformation of rural New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Salmond, A. 2014. “Tears of Rangi: Water, Power and People in New Zealand.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 285–309. doi:10.14318/hau4.3.017.
   Google Scholar
• Stoa, R. 2014. “Subsidiarity in Principle: Decentralization of Water Resources Management.” Utrecht Law Review 10: 31. doi:10.18352/ulr.267.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Inquiries. 2009. “Sweden’s Environmental Objectives: New Perspectives: Report of the Inquiry on the Environmental Objectives System.” Accessed 3 March 2020. https://www.government.se/49b75e/contentassets/a13cbca67aef4a12aac9e2792ca494ef/swedens-environmental-objectives—new-perspectives-sou-200983
   Google Scholar
• Tadaki, M. Y. 2018. “Filling the Void: Struggles over Implementing Freshwater Policy in Aotearoa New Zealand.” PhD thesis. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Tadaki, M. Y. 2020. “Is There Space for Politics in the Environmental Bureaucracy? Discretion and Constraint in Aotearoa New Zealand’s Ministry for the Environment.” Geoforum 111: 229–238. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharme, R. E. 2003. “A Global Perspective on Global Environmental Flow Assessment: Emerging Trends in the Development and Application of Environmental Flow Methodologies for Rivers.” River Research and Applications 19: 397–441. doi:10.1002/rra.736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton, S. 1991. “Resource Management Bill: Third Reading.” In New Zealand Parliamentary Debates 20: 3018.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, S. 1995. “Purpose and Principle in the Resource Management Act.” Waikato Law Review 3: 17–55.
   Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., M. Hekkert, R. Smiths, and B. A. S. Van Waveren. 2003. “Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes.” International Journal of Innovation Management 7: 247–279. doi:10.1142/S1363919603000817.
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., D. Liefferink, and A. Crabbé. 2018. “Stability and Change in Flood Risk Governance: On Path Dependencies and Change Agents.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 11: 230–238. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. C., D. C. Rose, H. S. Mumby, F. Benitez-Capistros, C. J. Derrick, T. Finch, C. Garcia, E. Marwaha, C. Morgans, and S. Parkinson. 2018. “A Methodological Guide to Using and Reporting on Interviews in Conservation Science Research.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 10–19. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar