Unfortunate diversions: a policy discourse analysis on the adjustment of the volume of water returned to the environment in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

References

• Alexandra, J. 2018. “Evolving Governance and Contested Water Reforms in Australia’s Murray Darling Basin.” Water 10 (2): 113. doi:10.3390/w10020113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, R. 2021. Dead in the Water: a Very Angry Book about Our Greatest Environmental Catastrophe … the Death of the Murray–Darling Basin. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Besser, L. 2017. Pumped: Who Is Benefiting from the Billions Spent on the Murray–Darling?’. Sydney: ABC Television. Four Corners.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, D., C. Arnott, B. Tucker, and P. Davies (20170 Murray Darling Basin SDL Adjustment Mechanism. Report by the Victorian and NSW Ministers’ Independent Expert Panel. Available at: https://www.industry.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/148228/Murray-Darling-Basin-SDL-Adjustment-Mechanism-Report-by-the-Victorian-and-NSW-Ministers-Independent-Expert-Panel.PDF [accessed 17 March 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P.K. 2018. Australia’s national approach to ‘Ecologically Sustainable Development’: success in principle, failure in policy, still in prospect. PhD thesis, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, W., and T. Cowan. 2008. “Evidence of Impacts from Rising Temperature on Inflows to the Murray–Darling Basin.” Geophysical Research Letters 35(7): article no. L07701. doi: 10.1029/2008GL033390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmody, E. 2010. “The Silence of the Plan: Will the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Ramsar Convention Be Implemented in the Murray–Darling Basin?” Environmental and Planning Law Journal 30: 56–73.
   Google Scholar
• Cathcart, M. 2010. The Water Dreamers: The Remarkable History of Our Dry Continent. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., M.J. Colloff, A. Lukasiewicz, and J. Pittock. 2021. A Trickle, Not a Flood: Environmental Watering in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 72: 601–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, W.C., L. van Kerkhoff, L. Lebel, and G.C. Gallopin. 2016. Crafting Usable Knowledge for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 4570–4578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoAG. 2004. Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative. Council of Australian Governments, Canberra. Available at: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/water/policy/nwi [accessed 9 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Colloff, M. J., P. Caley, N. Saintilan, C. A. Pollino, and N. C. Crossman. 2015. “Long-term Ecological Trends of flow-dependent Ecosystems in a Major River Basin.” Marine and Freshwater Research 66 (11): 957–969. doi:10.1071/MF14067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., S. Lavorel, R.M. Wise, M. Dunlop, I.C. Overton, and K.J. Williams. 2016. “Adaptation Services of Floodplains and Wetlands under Transformational Climate Change.” Ecological Applications 26 (4): 1003–1017. doi:10.1890/15-0848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., R. Gorddard, and M. Dunlop. 2018. The values-rules-knowledge Framework in Adaptation decision-making: A Primer. Canberra: CSIRO Land and Water.
   Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., and J. Pittock. 2019. “Why We Disagree about the Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Environmental Knowledge and the science-policy Decision Context.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 23 (2): 88–98. doi:10.1080/13241583.2019.1664878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloff, M.J., and J. Pittock. 2022. “Mind the Gap! Reconciling Environmental Water Requirements with Scarcity in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Water 14(2): article no. 208. doi: 10.3390/w14020208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2007. Water Act 2007. Compilation No. 28, 5 August, 2021. Federal Register of Legislation, Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2007A00137 [accessed 4 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2012. Water Act 2007 – Basin Plan 2012. Compilation No. 7, 24 January, 2020. Federal Register of Legislation, Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2017C00078 [accessed 4 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D., S. Dovers, and R.Q. Grafton. 2005. “A Critical Analysis of the National Water Initiative.” Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy 10: 81–107.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, D. 2007. Water Politics in the Murray–Darling Basin. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• CSIRO. 2008. Water Availability in the Murray–Darling Basin. A Report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray–Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., J. Harris, T. Hillman, and K. Walker. 2010. “The Sustainable Rivers Audit: Assessing River Ecosystem Health in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Marine and Freshwater Research 61 (7): 764–777. doi:10.1071/MF09043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. E., M. J. Stewardson, T. J. Hillman, J. R. Roberts, and M. C. Thoms. 2012. Sustainable Rivers Audit 2: The Ecological Health of Rivers in the Murray–Darling Basin at the End of the Millennium Drought (2008–2010). Vol. 1. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission.
   Google Scholar
• DEE. 1992. National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development. Canberra: Department of Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• DELWP. 2020. The Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism (SDLAM): Murray–Darling Basin Plan. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Melbourne. Available at: https://www.water.vic.gov.au/mdb/mdbp/the-sustainable-diversion-limit-adjustment-mechanism-sdlam-murray-darling-basin-plan [accessed 20 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• DEW. n.d. Sustainable Diversion Limits – Implementation and Compliance. Department for Environment and Water, Adelaide. Available at: https://www.environment.sa.gov.au/files/sharedassets/public/river_murray/basin_plan/implementation-of-sdls-through-the-wrp-factsheet.pdf [accessed 9 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• DFAT. 1981. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan for the Protection of Migratory Birds in Danger of Extinction and Their Environment. Australian Treaty Series 1981 No 6. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1981/6.html [accessed 15 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• DFAT. 1988. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the People’s Republic of China for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Their Environment. Australian Treaty Series 1988 No 22. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra. Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1988/22.html [accessed 15 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• DFAT. 2007. Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Korea on the Protection of Migratory Birds. Australian Treaty Series 2007 No. 24. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Canberra Available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/2007/24.html [accessed 15 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C.A., and C.S. Sneddon. 2019. “Political Borders, Epistemological Boundaries, and Contested Knowledges: Constructing Dams and Narratives in the Mekong River Basin.” Water 11(3): article no. 413. doi: 10.3390/w11030413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorddard, R., M.J. Colloff, R.M. Wise, D. Ware, and M. Dunlop. 2016. “Values, Rules and Knowledge: Adaptation as Change in the Decision Context”. Environmental Science and Policy 57: 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R.Q., J. Pittock, R. Davis, J. Williams, G. Fu, M. Warburton, B. Udall, et al. 2013. “Global Insights into Water Resources, Climate Change and Governance.” Nature Climate Change 3 (4): 315–321. doi:10.1038/nclimate1746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R.Q., J. Pittock, J. Williams, Q. Jiang, H. Possingham, and J. Quiggin. 2014. “Water Planning and hydro-climatic Change in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Ambio 43 (8): 1082–1092. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0495-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R.Q. 2019. “Policy Review of Water Reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: The “Do’s” and “Do‘Nots”.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 63 (1): 116–141. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, R.Q., M.J. Colloff, V Marshall, and J. Williams. 2020. “Confronting a ‘Post-truth Water World’: Facts versus Fiction in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia.” Water Alternatives 13 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N.R., J. McConville, and M. Piniewski. 2018. “How is the Term ‘Ecotechnology’ Used in the Research Literature? A Systematic Review with Thematic Synthesis.” Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 18 (3): 247–261. doi:10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. R. 2011. “Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods.” In The Sage Handbook for Research in Education, edited by C.F. Conrad and R.C. Serlin, 147–164. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, S. 2010. Murray–Darling Basin Authority Head Resigns. PM, Radio National, 7 December 2010. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2010/s3087241.htm [accessed 7 December 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Hay, I., ed. 2010. Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Third ed. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinmiller, B.T. 2009. “Path Dependency and Collective Action in Common Pool Governance.” International Journal of the Commons 3 (1): 131–147. doi:10.18352/ijc.79.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, B. 2010. Angry Crowd Burns Copy of Murray–Darling Report. ABC News, 13 October 2010. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-10-13/angry-crowd-burns-copy-of-murray-darling-report/2296638 [accessed 29 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Horne, J. 2017. “The Politics of Water Reform and Environmental Sustainability in the Murray–Darling Basin.” Water International 42 (8): 1000–1021. doi:10.1080/02508060.2017.1412201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, J. 2007. A National Plan for Water Security: Transcript of Address to the National Press Club, Great Hall, Parliament House. Available at: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22media%2Fpressrel%2FK81M6%22;src1=sm1 [accessed 2 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Indec. 2021. Status Assessment: Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism Program. Indec Consulting, Canberra. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/sdlam-independent-indec-status-assessment-report-april-2021.pdf [accessed 31 February 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, G., M.J. Colloff, and J. Pittock. 2021. “Using an Ecosystem Services Approach to Re-frame the Management of Flow Constraints in a Major Regulated River Basin.” Australasian Journal of Water Resources 25: 222–233. doi:10.1080/13241583.2020.1832723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, E., M.J Colloff, and J. Pittock. 2021. Lacking Character? A Policy Analysis of Environmental Watering of Ramsar Wetlands in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research. doi:10.1071/MF21036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2010. Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Appendix B – Hydrological Indicator Sites. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2011. The Living Murray Story: One of Australia’s Largest River Restoration Projects. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2017. Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Mechanism: Draft Determination Report. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/SDLAM-draft-determination-report_2.pdf [accessed 7 March 2022]
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2019a. Basin-wide Environmental Watering Strategy. Second ed. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2019b. Climate Change and the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2020a. The Basin Plan 2020 Evaluation. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2020b. Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Projects. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin-plan-roll-out/sustainable-diversion-limits/sdl-adjustment-proposals-state-projects [accessed 20 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• MDBA. 2022. Sustainable Diversion Limit Adjustment Projects. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/basin-plan-roll-out/sustainable-diversion-limits/sdl-adjustment-proposals-state-projects [accessed 7 March 2022].
   Google Scholar
• MDBC. 1998. Murray–Darling Basin Cap on Diversions, Water Year 1997/98: Striking the Balance. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Commission.
   Google Scholar
• MinCo. 2017. Implementing the Basin Plan. Report by the Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council to the Council of Australian Governments. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/Minco-report-implementing-basin-plan-2017.pdf [accessed 1 September 2020]
   Google Scholar
• MinCo. 2018. Implementing the Basin Plan: Progress Update. Report by the Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council to the Council of Australian Governments. Available at: https://www.mdba.gov.au/sites/default/files/pubs/Update-Minco-report-implementing-basin-plan-2018.pdf [accessed 1 September 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Molle, F. 2009. “Water, Politics, and River Basin Governance: Repoliticizing Approaches to River Basin Management.” Water International 34(1): 62–70. doi: 10.1080/02508060802677846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Water Grid Authority. 2020. The National Water Grid: Investing in Australia’s Future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. 2010. Ministerial Statements: Murray–Darling Basin Monday 25 October 2010. Hansard, House of Representatives, 1305–1306. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. 2018. Regulations and Determinations: Basin Plan Amendment (SDL Adjustments) Instrument. Wednesday 9 May 2018. Hansard, Senate, 2793–2805. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. 2019. Ministerial Statements: Murray–Darling Basin. Wednesday 27 November 2019. Hansard, House of Representatives, 6173. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, K, D Drum, and B McKenzie. 2021. Putting Communities at the Heart of the Basin Plan. Media Release, 3 March 2021, Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia. Available at: https://minister.awe.gov.au/pitt/media-release/off-farm-projects-recover-environmental-water [accessed 3 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Pittock, J, C.M Finlayson, A Gardner, and C. McKay. 2010. “Changing Character: The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and Climate Change in the Murray-Darling Australia.” Environmental and Planning Law Journal 27: 401–425.
   Google Scholar
• Pittock, J, and B Lankford. 2010. “Environmental Water Requirements: Demand Management in an Era of Water Scarcity.” Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7 (1): 75–93. doi:10.1080/19438151003603159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittock, J., C.M. Finlayson, and J. Howitt. 2013. “Beguiling and Risky: ‘Environmental Works and Measures’ for Wetland Conservation under a Changing Climate.” Hydrobiologia 708 (1): 111–131. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1292-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittock, J. 2019. Are We There Yet? the Murray–Darling Basin and Sustainable Water Management. Thesis Eleven 150 (1): 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, I., N. D. Crossman, J. Mahoney, P. Rustomji, Y. Chen, A. Brown, B. J. Robson, et al. 2012. Assessment of the Ecological and Economic Benefits of Environmental Water in the Murray–Darling Basin: The Final Report to the Murray–Darling Basin Authority from the CSIRO Multiple Benefits of the Basin Plan Project. Canberra: CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Secretariat. 2005. Resolution IX.1 Annex A. A Conceptual Framework for the Wise Use of Wetlands and the Maintenance of Their Ecological Character. Ramsar Secretariat, Gland. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/res/key_res_ix_01_annexa_e.pdf [accessed 17 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Secretariat. 1971. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Ramsar Secretariat, Gland. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_convention_text_e.pdf [accessed 9 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J.S., and R. Ptolemy. 2017. “Trade-offs and the Importance of Separating Science and Values in Environmental Flow Assessment.” Canadian Water Resources Journal 42 (1): 88–96. doi:10.1080/07011784.2016.1211036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samnakay, N. 2017. “Thinking Strategically in Federal Policy: Defining the Attributes of high-level Policies.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (1): 106–121. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samnakay, N. 2020. Understanding Design and Implementation Attributes for Strategic Policies: The Case of Australia’s National Environment Policies. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2020.1760232.
   Google Scholar
• SCBD. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio de Janeiro, 5 June 1992. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/ [accessed 8 August 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.H. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1): article no. 11. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee. 2011. A Balancing Act: Provisions of the Water Act 2007. Canberra: Department of the Senate, Parliament House.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, M., and R. Campbell. 2018. Desperate Measures: Supply Measures, Diversion Limits and the Murray–Darling Basin Plan. Canberra: Australia Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, and Johnson (2021) Floodplain Water Harvesting in the Northern New South Wales Murray–Darling Basin. Slattery and Johnson Pty ., Canberra. Available at: https://irnnsw.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/21022-fph-final-report.pdf [accessed 4 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, C. M. M., and R. T. Kingsford. 2011. “Disconnecting the Floodplain: Earthworks and Their Ecological Effect on a Dryland Floodplain in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” River Research and Applications 29 (2): 206–218. doi:10.1002/rra.1583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., and A. Harden. 2008. “Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews.” . BMC Medical Research Methodology 8(1): article no. 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. 2010. “Complexity and Challenges of long-term Environmental Governance.” Global Environmental Change 20 (3): 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (1994) Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Ramsar, Iran, 2.2.1971 as Amended by the Protocol of 3.12.1982 and the Amendments of 28.5.1987. 13 July 1994. Director, Office of International Standards and Legal Affairs, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris. Available at: https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_convention_text_e.pdf [accessed 17 March 2022]
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. New York: United Nations. Accessed 17 March 2022. https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, A.I.J.M., H.E. Beck, R.S. Crosbie, R.A.M. de Jeu, Y.Y. Liu, G.M. Podger, B. Timbal, and N.R. Viney. 2013. “The Millennium Drought in Southeast Australia (2001–2009): Natural and Human Causes and Implications for Water Resources, Ecosystems, Economy, and Society.” Water Resources Research 49 (2): 1040–1057. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. (2019) Murray–Darling Basin Royal Commission Report. Government of South Australia, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth Group. 2018. Requirements of SDL Adjustment Projects to Ensure They are Consistent with the Water Act 2007, Basin Plan 2012, MDBA Policies and Intergovernmental Agreements. Sydney: Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth Group. 2020. Assessment of River Flows in the Murray–Darling Basin: Observed versus Expected Flows under the Basin Plan 2012–2019. Sydney: Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S.A., E. Carmody, R.Q. Grafton, R. T. Kingsford, and A. Zuo. 2020. “The Rebound Effect on Water Extraction from Subsidising Irrigation Infrastructure in Australia”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 159: article no. 104755. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2019) We are Talking about “drought-proofing” Again – They are Simplistic Solutions that Will Destroy Australia. The Guardian, 25 September 2019. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/25/we-are-talking-about-drought-proofing-again-they-are-simplistic-solutions-that-will-destroy-australia [accessed 2 March 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.M. 2020. “Discourse Inertia and the Governance of Transboundary Rivers in Asia”. Earth System Governance 3: article no. 100041. doi:10.1016/j.esg.2019.100041.
   Google Scholar