Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Resource Management and Corporate Family Responsibility. When A Company Is “The Best Place to Work”: Elica Group, The Hi-Life Company

References

• Ackerman, R.W. “How Companies respond to Social Demands”. Harvard Business Review 51, no. 4 (1973): 88-98.
   Google Scholar
• AIDP. L’Impresa Familiarmente Responsabile tra sostenibilità e competitività aziendale, 2010. Accessed February 5, 2012, www.aidp.it/aidp/2418.pdf4.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T.D. “Family-Supportive. Work Environment: the Role of Organizational Perceptions”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58 (2001): 414-435.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S.E., Coffey, B.S. and Byerly, R.T. “Formal Organizational Initiatives and Informal Workplace Practices: Links to Work-family Conflict and Job-Related Outcomes”. Journal of Management 28, no. 6 (2002): 787-810.
   Google Scholar
• Argandoña, A. “The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good”. Journal of Business Ethics 17, no. 9 (1998): 1093-1102.
   Google Scholar
• Argandoña, A. “Fostering Values in Organizations”. Journal of Business Ethics, 45 (2003): 15-29.
   Google Scholar
• Argandoña, A. “Anthropological and Ethical Foundations of Organization Theory.” In Rethinking Business Management. Examining the Foundations of Business Education edited by S. Gregg and J.R. Jr. Stoner, 22-37. Princeton, NJ: The Witherspoon Institute, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Some, Different or Both?”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30, no.1 (2006): 1-22.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. Doing Focus Group. London: Sage, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington J., Higgins C. and Frame B. “Initiating Sustainable Development Reporting: Evidence from New Zealand”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22, no. 4 (2009): 588-625.
   Google Scholar
• Behson, S.J. “Which Dominates? The Relative Importance of Work-family Organizational Support and General Organizational Context on Employee Outcomes”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61(2002): 53-72.
   Google Scholar
• Behson, S.J. “The Relative Contribution of Formal and Informal Organizational Work-Family Sup-port”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2005): 487-500.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, S., Dench, S., Tamkin, P. & Cummings, J. Family-friendly Employment: The Business Case. Institute for Employment Studies, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, S., Hyman, J. and Summers, J. Putting Family-friendly Working Policies into Practice. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, M.R., Beu, D.S., Frink, D.D., Howard, J.L., Berkson, H., Mobbs, T.A. and Ferris, G.R. “Ethical Issues in Human Resources Systems”. Human Resource Management Review 11, no. 1 (2001): 11-29.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A., Gasser, M. and Smart, L. “A Social-cognitive Perspective on Using Family-friendly Ben-efits”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65 (2004):57-70.
   Google Scholar
• Calcagnini, G. and Favaretto, I. (eds). The Economics of Small Business. An International Perspective. London and New York: Springer Heidlbergh Dorrecht, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Carrol, A.B. “A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance”. Academy of Management Review 16, no. 4 (1979): 497-505.
   Google Scholar
• CBSR. Best People Practices: The Integration of Values into People Practices. Vancouver, BC: CBSR, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• CIPD - Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and HR’s Role. London, UK: CIPD, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H. and Zahra, S.A. “Creating Wealth in Family Firms through Managing Resources: Comments and Extensions”. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, Summer, (2003): 359-365.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.M. “New Sentencing Guidelines to Reward Ethical Culture, Compliance, Commitment”. HR Magazine, September 28, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, J. and Esteban, R., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Commitment”. Business Ethics: A European Review 16, no. 1 (2007): 19-33.
   Google Scholar
• CRF. Top Employers Italia 2012. Milano: F. Angeli, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Corbetta, P. La ricerca sociale: metodologie e tecniche. Le tecniche qualitative. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Del Baldo, M., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate governance in Italian SMEs: Toward a “Territorial” Model Based on Small “Champions of CSR”. International Journal of Sustainable Society 2, no. 3 (2010): 215-247.
   Google Scholar
• Del Baldo M. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance in Italian Smes: the Experience of some “Spirited Businesses”. Journal of Management and Governance 16, no. 1 (2012):1-36.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, D. and Cabrera, M.K., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in Spain”. Journal of Business Ethics 56, no. 19 (2005): 59-71.
   Google Scholar
• Desrochers, S., Lehoux, M., Halpern, D. and Tse, A. Implicit Measures of Work-Family Linkages? Findings of a Validation Study on Working Students at a Local Community College. Berger Institute for Work, Families and Children, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Desrochers, S., Lehoux, M., Halpern, D., and Riggio, H. Work Family Blurring in Two Local Organization: Findings of Studies Conducted in February and March of 2004. Berger Institute for Work, Families and Children, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dex, S., Smith, C. and Winter, S. Effects of Family-friendly Policies on Business Performance. Judge Institute of Management Studies, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, S. “The Relationship Between Corporate Culture and Corporate Identity”. Public Relations Quarterly 31. No. 4 (1986): 7-13.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, W. G., Jr. Cultural Change in Family Firms: Anticipating and Managing Business and Family Transitions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• EC. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. 25.10.2011 COM(2011) 681 final. Brussels, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. “Building Theories from Case Study Research”. Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4 (1989): 532–550.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challeng-es”. Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 1 (2007): 25-32.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. The Green Capitalism. London: Victor Gollancz, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. “Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-win business strategies for Sustainable Development”. California Management Review 36, no. 2 (1994): 90-100.
   Google Scholar
• EU. Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development, Com(2002)347 final. Brussels, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• EU. Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole for Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. Com(2006)136, final. Brussels, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• EU. European alliance for families, Promoting Family-Friendliness at Workplace through Awards, Audits and Labeling Schemes, 2010, accessed June 21, 2011,http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/emplweb/families/admintool/userfiles/file/Bosnicovareport-formatted.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EURISKO Corporate Social. Responsibility Monitor 2009, accessed July 2, 2012, http:// www.sodalitas.it/files/18/Anselmi_Eurisko.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, C. Working-Time Preferences and Work-Life Balance in the EU: Some Policy Considerations for Enhancing the Quality of Life. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Faldetta, G. Corporate Family Responsibility e Work-life Balance. Milano: F.Angeli, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Flik, U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Sage, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fondazione M. Vigorelli (2012), Osservatorio CFR, rapporto biennale 2011-2012 dell’osservatorio nazionale sulla famiglia, 17 maggio 2012, accessed October 20, 2012, http:// www.marcovigorelli.com/index.php/osservatoriocfr .html
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E. and Evan, W. “Corporate Governance: a Stakeholder Interpretation”. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19, no. 4 (1990): 337-59.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Palmar, B.L. and De Colle, S. Stakeholder Theory. The State of the Art. Cambridge, N.Y: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fuà, G. and Zacchia, C. (eds). Industrializzazione senza fratture. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, M.A. “The Family Business and its Social Responsibilities”. Family Business Review 17, no. 2 (2004): 135-149.
   Google Scholar
• Garriga, E. and Melé, D. “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory”. Journal of Business Ethics 53, no. 1 (2004): 51-71.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner, W.B. “Entrepreneurial Narrative and a Science of the Imagination”. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (2007): 613-627.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J.L. and Finley, A. “Coverage and Effectiveness of Family-Responsive Work-place Policies”. Human Resource Management Review, 12 (2002): 313-337.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, H. “Work/Life Balance: Wisdom or Whining”. Organizational Dynamic 31, no. 2 (2002): 177-193.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, H. Family-Friendly Working, What a Performance: An Analysis of the Relationship Between the Availability of Family-Friendly Policies and Establishment Performance. London: Centre for Economic Performance - London School Of Economics and Political Science, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. London: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Necessity Not a Choice. Bangkok, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J.H., Collins, K.M. and Shaw, J.D. “The Relation between Work-family Balance and Quality Life”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63 (2003): 510-531.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, K. “Employee Engagement Partnerships: can they Contribute to the Development of an Integrated CSR Culture’?” In CPI (Cambridge Programme for Industry) 2005. Partnership Matters: Current Issues in Cross-sector Collaboration, no 3 (2005): 7-20. Retrieved at www.cpi.cam.ac.uk/pccp/ ParternMatters3.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-related Values. London: Sage, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A.R. “The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work”. California Management Review 39, no. 4 (1997): 79-97.
   Google Scholar
• IESE (2008), La tua azienda è Family-friendly? accessed June 3, 2012, http:// www3.iese.edu/ifrei/ ifrei_italia/h0.asp.
   Google Scholar
• ISFOL Rapporto 2009, accessed September 2, 2011, http;// www.isfol.it/DocEditor/test/File/Rapporto%20Isfol%202009/Sintesi_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFERA, “Family Firms Dominate”. Family Business Review 16, no. 4 (2003): 235-239.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T.M. “Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redifined”. California Management Review 22, no. 2 (1980): 59-67.
   Google Scholar
• Kapitàny, B., Kovacs, K. & Krieger, H. Working and Living in an Enlarged Europe. European Foundation for the improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kodz, J, Harper, H. and Dench, S. Work-Life Balance. Beyond the Rhetoric. Institute for Employment Studies, Report 384, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Koos, S. “The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Analysis of Smaller Firms’ Civic Engagement in Western Europe”. Socioeconomic Review 10, no. 1 (2012): 135-162.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardy Region. Lombardy 2020, From the Green Paper to the White Paper – Roadmap for the reconciliation of Family and Work-life. Action Plan towards a regional system in support of reconciliation objectives 2011 – 2013, 13 October 2011:1-17, accessed March, 2, 2012, http:// www.premiofamiglialavoro.regione.lombardia.it/cs/2011.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, J.C. “Managing Workplace Commitment by Putting People First”. Human Resource Management Review 11, no. 3 (2001): 327-336.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, A. and Bonham, J. “Corporate Social Responsibility Belongs with HR”. Canadian HR Reporter, April 5 (2004): 11-13.
   Google Scholar
• Melcrum. Engaging Employees in Corporate Responsibility: How the World’s Leading Companies Embed CR in Employee Decision-making. London, UK, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Melé, D. Not Only Stakeholder Interests. The Firm Oriented Toward the Common Good. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Melé, D. Business Ethics in Action. Seeking Human Excellence in Organizations. Hampshire, GB: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Melé, D. “The Firm as a “Community of Persons”: a Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos”. Journal of Business Ethics 106, no. 1 (2012): 89-101.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K. “The Focused Interviews and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51 (1987): 550-556.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., Ryu, K., and Mirvis, P. “Leading Corporate Citizenship: Governance, Structure and Systems”. Corporate Governance, 9 (2009): 39-49.
   Google Scholar
• Naumes, W. and Naumes, M.J. The Art and Craft of Case Writing, 2nd ed. London: ME Sharpe, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• OECD “Bosses and Babies: Reconciling Work and Family Life”, Vol. 1, Australia, Denmark and the Netherlands; Vol. 2, Austria, Ireland and Japan; Vol. 3, New Zealand, Portugal and Switzer-land; Vol. 4, Canada, Finland, Sweden and United Kingdom. OECD, 2002, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Method (3rd ed.). London: Sage, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzellini, A.M. and Tempia, A. Quando il lavoro è amico. Aziende e famiglia: un incontro possibile. Roma: Edizioni Lavoro, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Puchta, C. and Potter, J. Focus Group Practice. London: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. Making Democracy Work. Civic Tradition in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. “When too Much is not Enough: Actual and Preferred Hours in the United States and Abroad”. Sociological Forum 19, no. 1 (2004): 89-120.
   Google Scholar
• Rode, J.C., Rehg, M.T., Near, J.P. and Underhill, J.R. “The Effect of Work/Family Confilct on Intention to Quit: The Mediating Roles of Job and Life Satisfaction”. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2 (2002): 65-82.
   Google Scholar
• Roehling, P.V., Roehling, M.V. and Moen, P. “The Relationship Between Work-Life Policies and Practices and Employee Loyalty: A Life Course Perspective”. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 22, no. 2 (2001): 141-170.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. “The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational Culture”. Organizational Dynamics, Summer (1983): 13-28.
   Google Scholar
• Sorci C. (ed). Lo sviluppo integrale delle aziende. Milano: Giuffrè, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, L.J. “Towards a Human Centred Organisation: The Case of the Small Firms”, paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Ethics in Contemporary Human Resource Management, Imperial College, London, 7 January, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, L.J., Habisch, A. and Schmidpeter, R. (ed.). Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Palgrave: MacMillan, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, C. “The Role of Human Resource Management in Corporate Social Responsibility. Issue Brief and Roadmap, Report”, Strandberg Consulting, May 2009, Burnaby, BC: 1-36, accessed July, 3, 2012, http:// www.corostrandberg.com.
   Google Scholar
• Tencati, A. and Zsolnai, L. “The Collaborative Enterprise”. Journal of Business Ethics 17, no. 3 (2008): 311-325.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, S. Improving Work-Life Balance - What are Other Countries Doing? Canada: Labour Program, Human Resources and Skills Development, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, L.K., Butterfield, K.D. and McCabe, D. “The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behaviours”. Business Ethics Quarterly 8, no. 3 (1998): 447-476.
   Google Scholar
• Treviño, L.K. and Brown, M.E. “Managing to be Ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths”. Academy of Management Executive 18. No. 2 (2004): 69-81.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, L.M., van Goor-Balk, H.F.M. and Masurel, E. “Family Business and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Sample of Dutch Firms”. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11, no. 2 (2004): 186-194.
   Google Scholar
• Unioncamere. Models of Corporate Social Responsibility in Italy. Executive Summary. Rome: Italian Union of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Craft and Agriculture, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Unioncamere. “Le attività del Sistema Camerale sulla Responsabilità sociale”, febbraio 2007, accessed May, 4, 2011, http:// www.csr.unioncamere.it.
   Google Scholar
• Unioncamere. Le Piccole e Medie imprese nell’economia italiana. Rapporto 2009, Istituto Tagliacarne. Milano: F. Angeli, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, C. “Programmazione, controllo e sviluppo integrale delle aziende”. In Lo sviluppo integrale delle aziende edited by C. Sorci, 41-66. Milano: Giuffrè, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Waddock, S. “Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics and the Progress of Corporate Citizen-ship”. Business and Society Review 109, no. 1 (2004): 5-42.
   Google Scholar
• Waismel-Manor, R., Moen P. and Sweet, S. What Factors Predict Dual-Earner Middle-Class Couples Feeling Highly Successful in Their Jobs, Families, and Balancing Both? Cornell Employment and Family Careers Institute, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Whitener, E.M. “Do ‘‘high-commitment’’ Human Resource Practices affect Employee Commitment? A cross-level Analysis using Hierarchical Linear Modeling”. Journal of Management 27, no. 5 (2011): 515-535.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. “Ethics and Employees: Making the Connection”. Academy of Management Executive 18, no. 2(2004): 121-125.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G., Treviño, L.K. and Cochran, P.L. “Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures and Corporate Ethics Practices”. Academy of Management Journal 42, no. 5 (1999): 539-552.
   Google Scholar
• Werbel, J. and Walter, M.H. “Changing Views of Work and Family Roles. A Symbiotic Perspective”. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2002): 293-298.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. “Blending Business and Benevolence”. Chemical Week 158, no. 5 (1996): 42-4.
   Google Scholar
• Yeandle, S., Crompton, R., Wigfield and A. Dennett, J. Employers, Communities and Family-Friendly Employment Policies. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. and Marais, M. “A Multi-level Perspective of CSR Reporting: The Implications of National Institutions and Industry Risk Characteristics”. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20, no. 5 (2012): 432-450.
   Google Scholar
• Zadek, S., Pruzan, P. and Evans, R. (eds.). Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting and Auditing. London: Earthscan Publication, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Zamagni, S. (ed.). The Economics of Altruism. Hants: E. Elgar, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zamagni, S. L’economia del bene comune. Roma: Città Nuova, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Zedeck, S. and Mosier, K.L. “Work in the Family and Employing Organization”. American Psychologist 45, no. 2 (2003): 240-251.
   Google Scholar