Relevance of innovation cooperation for firms’ innovation activity: the case of Slovenia

References

• Adams, J. D., & Mircea, M. (2004). R&D sourcing, joint ventures and innovation: A multiple indicators approach ( Working Paper 10474). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Arranz, N., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2008). The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Technovation, 28, 88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, S., & Bolli, T. (2009). A Comparison of firm-level innovation cooperation in five European countries ( Working Papers No. 232). ETH Zürich: KOF.
   Google Scholar
• Ayari, N. (2010). Internal capabilities, R&D cooperation with universities and firms’ innovativeness level: Evidence from Spain. ( Working Paper No. 07/2010). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms – Evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33, 209–223.10.1016/j.respol.2003.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diesderen, B., Lokshin, B., & Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237–1263.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Co-operative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492.10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2007). Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36, 930–948.10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buis, M. L. (2010). Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. Stata Journal, 10, 305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Molero, J. (2003). Introduction. In J. Cantwell & J. Molero (Eds.), Multinational enterprises innovative strategies and systems of innovation (pp. 1–14). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotič Svetina, A., & Prodan, I. (2008). How internal and external sources of knowledge contribute to firms’ innovation performance. Managing Global Transitions, 6, 277–299.
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., Jaklič, A., & Rojec, M. (2006). Do external knowledge spillovers induce firms’ innovations? Evidence from Slovenia. In A. T. Tavares & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Multinationals, clusters and innovation: Does public policy matter? (pp. 27–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, M. R., Zucker, L. G., & Wang, A. (2003). Universities, joint ventures and success in the advanced technology program ( Working Paper 9463). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w9463
   Google Scholar
• D’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D on duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2011). Science, technology and innovation in Europe, 2011 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K. R. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38, 255–267.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway ( Discussion Paper No. DP8484). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38, 1125–1135.10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. (2001, August). Inter-firm R&D partnership – An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Strategic research partnerships: Proceedings from a National Science Foundation Workshop, Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov./statistics/nsf01336/p1s3.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., & Mohnen, P. (2011). Complementarity between in-house R&D and technology purchasing: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms ( Working Paper Series 2011-048). Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.
   Google Scholar
• Janz, N., Lööf, H., & Peters, B. (2003). Firm level innovation and productivity – Is there a common story across countries? ( Working Paper 03-26). Mannheim: ZEW.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2009). An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances. Research Policy, 38, 358–368.10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., Muller, E., & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., & Zang, I. (2000). Meet me halfway: Research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 995–1012.10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00054-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. M. G., Folkeringa, M., de Jong, J. P. J., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2003). Innovation and firm performance ( Research Report H2000207). Zoetermeer: SCALES.
   Google Scholar
• Kremp, E., & Mairesse, J. (2004). Knowledge management, innovation and productivity ( Working Paper 10237). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri, R. (2003). Cooperation v/s non-cooperation in R&D competition with Spillovers (Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 166). School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lokshin, B., Belderbos, R., & Carree, M. (2008). The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 399–413.10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lööf, H. (2009). Multinational enterprises and innovation: Firm level evidence on spillover via R&D collaboration. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19, 41–71.10.1007/s00191-008-0103-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majcen, B., Rojec, M., Jaklič, A., & Radošević, S. (2005). Productivity growth and functional upgrading in foreign subsidiaries in the Slovenian manufacturing sector. East-West Series in Economic and Business Environment, 8, 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Cooperative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511664441
   Google Scholar
• Narula, R. (2003). Understanding the growth of international R&D alliances. In J. Cantwell & J. Molero (Eds.), Multinational enterprises, innovative strategies and systems of innovation (pp. 129–152). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4, 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2005). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2005. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, M. L., & Sanna-Randaccio, F. (2000). Endogenous R&D and foreign direct investment in international oligopolies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 339–367.10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fegerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, M. (1991). Technology acquisition strategies and processes: A reconsideration of the make versus buy decision. International Journal of Technology Management, 7, 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sanna-Randaccio, F., & Veugelers, R. (2003). Global innovation strategies of MNEs: Implications for host economies. In J. Cantwell & J. Molero (Eds.), Multinational enterprises, innovative strategies and systems of innovation (pp. 14–46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vega-Jurado, J., Gutierrez-Garcia, A., Fernandez-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarres-Henriquez, L. (2008). The effect of external and internal factors on firms’ product innovation. Research Policy, 37, 616–632.10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26, 303–315.10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28, 63–80.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinding, A. L. (2002). Interorganizational diffusion and transformation of knowledge in the process of product innovation ( PhD thesis). Aalborg: Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, R., & Stam, E. (2007). Innovation networks of high tech SMEs: Creation of knowledge but no creation of value (Economic Research papers 2007–042). Jena: Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics.
   Google Scholar