909
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The optimal fiscal rule in the context of accession to the Eurozone

, &
Pages 398-406 | Received 29 Aug 2013, Accepted 06 Feb 2015, Published online: 29 May 2015

References

  • Afonso, A., & Sousa, R. (2009). The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy ( Working Paper Series No. 991). Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank.
  • Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2005). Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? ( NBER Working Paper No. 11600). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w11600
  • Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4, 1–27.
  • Baum, A., & Koester, G. B. (2011). The impact of fiscal policy on economic activity over the business cycle – Evidence from a threshold VAR analysis ( Discussion Paper No. 3). Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.
  • Baxter, M., & King, R. G. (1993). Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review, 83, 315–334.
  • Belullo, A., & Dužman, T. (2011). Relations among government revenues gross domestic product (GDP) of the Republic of Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 24, 143–152.
  • Benigno, P., & Woodford, M. (2003). Optimal monetary and fiscal policy: A linear quadratic approach ( NBER Working Paper No. 9905). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers ( IMF Working Paper No. 1). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.10.3386/w18779
  • Bogdanov, B. (2010). Cyclicality of fiscal policy over the business cycle: An empirical study on developed and developing countries, agency for economic analysis and forecasting ( Working Paper Series No. 1). Sofia: Agency for Economic Analysis and Forecasting.
  • Brunila, A., Buti, M., & in't Veld, J. (2002). Fiscal policy in Europe: How effective are automatic stabilisers? ( European Economy Economic Papers No. 177). Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
  • Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. Indianapolis, IN: Academic Press.
  • Buiter, W. H. (2003). Ten commandments for a fiscal rule in the E(M)U. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Buiter, W. H., & Grafe, C. (2002). Patching up the pact: Some suggestions for enhancing fiscal sustainability and macroeconomic stability in an enlarged European Union ( Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 3496). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Catao, L. A., & Sutton, B. W. (2002). Sovereign defaults: The role of volatility ( International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 02/149). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2011). When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy, 119, 78–121.10.1086/659312
  • Coenen, G., Erceg, C., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., & Kumhof, M. (2010). Effect of fiscal stimulus in structural models ( IMF Working Paper No. 1073). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (1998). The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Economic Journal, 108, 1009–1025.10.1111/ecoj.1998.108.issue-449
  • Gajewski, P. (2014). Sovereign spreads and financial market behaviour before and during the crisis ( Lodz Economics Working Papers No. 4). Łódź: University of Lodz.
  • Gavin, M., Hausmann, R., Perotti, R., & Talvi, E. (1996). Managing fiscal policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, procyclicality and limited credithwothiness ( Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. 326). Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
  • Giorno, C., Richardson, P., Roseveare, D., & van den Noord, P. (1995). Potential output, output gap and structural budget balances ( OECD Economic Studies No. 24). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.10.1787/533876774515
  • Gnip, A. G. (2011). Discretionary measures and automatic stabilizers in the Croatian fiscal policy. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 24, 45–74.
  • Kopits, G., & Symansky, S. (1998) Fiscal policy rules. ( International Monetary Fund Occasional Paper No. 162). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.10.5089/9781557757043.084
  • Krajewski, P. (2004). The importance of the budget deficit decomposition into a structural and a cyclical component. Comparative Economic Research, 7, 141–156.
  • Kydland, F., & Prescott, E. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473–492.10.1086/jpe.1977.85.issue-3
  • Lane, P. (2003). The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2661–2675.10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00075-0
  • Mackiewicz, M. (2007). Making the stability pact more flexible: Does it lead to pro-cyclical fiscal policies? Fiscal Studies, 28, 251–268.10.1111/fisc.2007.28.issue-2
  • Piłat, K. (2011). Optimum currency area index for UE countries beyond Eurozone. AD ALTA, 1, 87–89.
  • Staehr, K. (2008). Fiscal policies and business cycles in an expanded euro area. Economic Systems, 32, 46–69.10.1016/j.ecosys.2007.06.007
  • Talvi, E., & Vegh, C. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclicality of fiscal policy. Journal of Development Economics, 78, 156–190.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002
  • Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy No. 39. North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Taylor, J. B. (2000). Reassessing discretionary fiscal policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 21–36.10.1257/jep.14.3.21