Accounting and governance risk forecasting in the health care industry

References

• Archer, K. J., & Kimes, R. V. (2008). Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 2249–2260.10.1016/j.csda.2007.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G., & Philipov, A. (2009). Dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts and credit rating. Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 83–101.10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini, A., & Capitanio, A. (2003). Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t-distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 65, 367–389.10.1111/rssb.2003.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini, A., & Genton, M. G. (2008). Robust likelihood methods based on the skew-t and related distributions. International Statistical Review, 76, 106–129.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, C. R. B., Bolfarine, H., & Pereira, J. R. G. (2008). Bayesian density estimation using skew student-t-normal mixtures. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52, 5075–5090.10.1016/j.csda.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. W., & Paelinckx, D. (2008). Evaluation of random forest and adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112, 2999–3011.10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enhanced Online News. (2010). Audit integrity’s ‘AGR’ rating outperforms leading academic accounting risk measures, independent study finds. Retrieved from http://eon.businesswire.com/news/eon/20100315006063/en
   Google Scholar
• Genuer, R., Poggi, J. M., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2010). Variable selection using random forests. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31, 2225–2236.10.1016/j.patrec.2010.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyon, I. (2008). Practical feature selection: From correlation to causality. In NATO science for peace and security, Vol. 19 of D: Information and communication security, Ch. 3, (pp. 27–43). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hapfelmeier, A., & Ulm, K. (2013). A new variable selection approach using random forests. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 60, 50–69.10.1016/j.csda.2012.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabasinskas, A., Rachev, S. T., Sakalauskas, L., Sun, W., & Belovas, I. (2009). α-stable paradigm in financial markets. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 11, 642–688.
   Google Scholar
• Kabasinskas, A., Rachev, S. T., Sakalauskas, L., Sun, W., & Belovas, I. (2010). Stable mixture model with dependent states for financial return series exhibiting short histories and periods of strong passivity. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 12, 268–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsyte, Z., Verikas, A., Bacauskiene, M., & Gelzinis, A. (2013). A novel technique to design an adaptive committee of models applied to predicting company’s future performance. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal archive, 40, 2051–2057.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. M., & Mallick, B. K. (2003). Moments of random vectors with skew t distribution and their quadratic forms. Statistics & Probability Letters, 63, 417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Wang, M., Wang, J., & Li, D. (2013). Comparison of random forest, support vector machine and back propagation neural network for electronic tongue data classification: Application to the recognition of orange beverage and Chinese vinegar. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 177, 970–980.10.1016/j.snb.2012.11.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikias, C. L., & Shao, M. (1995). Signal processing with alpha-stable distributions and applications. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. P. (2007). Stable distributions – models for heavy tailed data. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, A. (2002). Empirical likelihood. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Panagiotelis, A., & Smith, M. (2008). Bayesian density forecasting of intraday electricity prices using multivariate skew t distributions. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 710–727.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, R. A., Sharp, N. Y., & Wood, D. A. (2011). Detecting and predicting accounting irregularities: A comparison of commercial and academic risk measures. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546675
   Google Scholar
• Rachev, S. T., Tokat, Y., & Schwatz, E. S. (2003). The stable Non-Gaussian asset allocation: A comparison with the classical Gaussian approach. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 27, 937–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnath, S., Rock, S., & Shane, P. B. (2008). The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 34–75.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samorodnitsky, G., & Taqqu, M. S. (2000). Stable Non-Gaussian random processes, stochastic models with infinite variance. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spall, J. C. (2003). Introduction to stochastic search and optimization: Estimation, simulation, and control. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/0471722138
   Google Scholar
• Spellman, G. K., & Watson, R. (2009). Corporate governance ratings and corporate performance: An analysis of Governance Metrics International (GMI) ratings of US firms, 2003 to 2008. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1392313
   Google Scholar
• Verikas, A., Gelzinis, A., & Bacauskiene, M. (2011). Mining data with random forests: A survey and results of new tests. Pattern Recognition, 44, 330–349.10.1016/j.patcog.2010.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar