2,020
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Planning the priority of high tech industries based on SWARA-WASPAS methodology: The case of the nanotechnology industry in Iran

, , , &
Pages 1111-1137 | Received 08 Apr 2014, Accepted 15 Sep 2015, Published online: 27 Nov 2015

References

  • Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013a). Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods. Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, 24, 5–17.
  • Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013b). “A hybrid approach for market segmentation and market segment evaluation and selection: An integration of data mining and MADM”, Transformations in Business & Economics, 12 2B (29B), 431–458.
  • Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Synergies of data mining and multiple attribute decision making. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 767–776.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.921
  • Ayres, R. U. (1988). Technology: The wealth of nations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 33, 189–201.10.1016/0040-1625(88)90013-3
  • Bitarafan, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Lale Arefi, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Mahmoudzadeh, A. (2014). Evaluation of real-time intelligent sensors for structural health monitoring of bridges based on SWARA-WASPAS. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 9, 333–340.10.3846/bjrbe.2014.40
  • Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing- Decision Making. Informatica, 25(1), 1–20.10.15388/Informatica.2014.01
  • Dahl man, C., (2007). Technology globalization and international competitiveness challenges for developing countries. In Industrial development for the 21st Century: Sustainable development perspectives (pp. 1–423). New York, NY: United Nations.
  • Drexler, E. K. (1986). Engines of creation: The coming era of Nanotechnology. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Drexler, E. K. (1992). Nanosystems: Molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Durand, T. (2003). Twelve lessons from key technologies 2005’: The French technology foresight exercise. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 161–177.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
  • Ginevicius, R. (2011). A new determining method for the criteria weights in multi-criteria evaluation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 10, 1067–1095.
  • Griliches, Z. (1981). R&D patents and productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Griliches, Z., & Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp. 465–501). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H., Derakhti, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Morshed Varzandeh, M. H. (2013). Decision making on business issues with foresight perspective; an application of new hybrid MCDM model in shopping mall locating. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 7111–7121.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.040
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Esfahani, M. H., Bitarafan, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Lale Arefi, S. (2013). Developing a new hybrid MCDM method for selection of the optimal alternative of mechanical longitudinal ventilation of tunnel pollutants during automobile accidents. Transport, 28, 89–96.10.3846/16484142.2013.782567
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Farrokhzad, M., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Investigating on successful factors of online games based on explorer. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 16, 161–169.
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Saparauskas, J. (2013). New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414.
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Sustainable development of rural areas’ building structures based on local climate. Procedia Engineering, 57, 1295–1301.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.163
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Design of products with both International and Local perspectives based on Yin-Yang balance theory and SWARA method. Economska Istraživanja- Economic Research, 26, 153–166.
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Bahrami, M. (2014). Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20, 534–553.10.3846/20294913.2014.881435
  • Jannatifard, M., Nikraftar, H., & Safdari, F. (2011). Iran’s 2010-2011 competitiveness Report. Iran chamber of commerce, industries and mines. Center for Economic Research and Evaluation (In Persian).
  • Keenan, M. (2003). Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: The UK experience. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 129–160.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-131X
  • Keršulienė, V., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17, 645–666.10.3846/20294913.2011.635718
  • Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 243–258.10.3846/jbem.2010.12
  • Klusacek, K. (2004). Technology foresight in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 89–105.10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004623
  • Lichtenberg, F. R. (1992). R&D investment and international productivity differences (NBER working paper 4161). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Nadiri, I. (1993). Innovations and technological spillovers (NBER working paper 4423). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w4423
  • Ortega-Argilés, R., Piva, M., Potters, L., & Vivarelli, M. (2010). Is corporate R&D investment in high-tech sectors more effective? Contemporary Economic Policy, 28, 353–365.
  • Rosenberg, N., Landau, R., & Mowery, D. C. (1992). Technology and the wealth of nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Saaty, L. T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Company.
  • Saaty, L. T., & Vargas, L. G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytical hierarchy process. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Sadeghi, A., Azar, A., & Sepehri Rad, R. (2012). Developing a fuzzy group AHP model for prioritizing the factors affecting success of High-Tech SME’s in Iran: A case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 957–961.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.163
  • Sarkar, S., & Beitollahi, A. (2009). An overview on nanotechnology activities in Iran. Iranian Journal Public Health, 38, 65–68.
  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3
  • Son, S. H., Park, B., Oh, S. H., & Yu, H. Y. (2006). Priority Setting of future Technology area based on Korean Technology Foresight exercise. PICMET 2006 proceeding, 1481–1487
  • Staniunas, M., Medineckiene, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Kalibatas, D. (2013). To modernize or not: Ecological–economical assessment of multi-dwelling houses modernization. Archives in Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 13, 88–98.10.1016/j.acme.2012.11.003
  • Steenhuis, H. J., & Bruijn, E. J. D. (2005). High technology in developing countries analysis of technology strategy, technology transfer, and success factors in the aircraft industry. 1st International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, Bail, 1–13.
  • Stokey, N. L. (1995). R&D and economic growth. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 469–489.10.2307/2298038
  • Sušinskas, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria assessment of pile-columns alternatives. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 6, 77–83.
  • Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004). R&D productivity and the spillover effects of high-tech industry on the traditional manufacturing sector: The case of Taiwan. World Economics, 27, 1555–1570.10.1111/twec.2004.27.issue-10
  • Vafaeipour, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Morshed Varzandeh, M. H., Derakhti, A., Keshavarz, Eshkalag M., & (2014). Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar plants in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 653–663.10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.083
  • Vision (1404, 2025) (2011). The status of science & Technology in Iran in 2010 in comparison with other countries. Retrieved from http://www.vision1404.ir/fa/Oloom.aspx>(InPersian).
  • Wang, H. W., & Wu, M. C. (2012). Business type, industry value chain, and R&D performance: Evidence from high-tech firms in an emerging market. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, 326–340.
  • Wang, D. H. M., Yu, T. H. K., & Liu, H. Q. (2013). Heterogeneous effect of high-tech industrial R&D spending on economic growth. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1990–1993.10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.023
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 6, 3–6.