2,075
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The value of knowledge sharing in decision-making and organisational development: a model-theoretic systemic analysis of an intervention in an Austrian S.M.E.

ORCID Icon
Pages 148-167 | Received 27 Mar 2017, Accepted 04 Jun 2018, Published online: 22 Feb 2019

References

  • Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations Evolving. London:Sage.
  • Amason, A. C., & Mooney, A. C. (2008). The icarus paradox revisited: how strong performance sows the seeds of dysfunction in future strategic decision-making. Strategic Organization, 6(4), 407–434. doi: 10.1177/1476127008096364
  • Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2008). Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies, 29(8-9), 1187–1208. doi: 10.1177/0170840608094776
  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–706. doi: 10.2307/3094913
  • Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 5–14. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160104
  • Bettis, R. A., & Wong, S. S. (2003). Dominant logic, knowledge creation, and managerial choice. In Easterby-Smith, M. & Lyles, M. A. (Eds), The Blackwell Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge: 343–355. London: Blackwell.
  • Bohm, D. (2004). On Dialogue. 2nd rev. edition. New York: Routledge.
  • Born, R., & Gatarik, E. (2013). Knowledge management and cognitie science: Reflecting the limits of decision making. In Kreitler, S. (ed.), Cognition and Motivation: Forging an Interdisciplinary Perspective: 321–351, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Born, R., & Gatarik, E. (2014). Against crowding out the meaning of meaning. In Kreitler, S. & Urbánek, T. (eds.), Conceptions of Meaning: chapter 5, New York: Nova Publishers.
  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244. doi: 10.2307/2392619
  • Burgelman, R. A. (2002). Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 325–357. doi: 10.2307/3094808
  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Garud, R., & Rappa, M. A. (1994). A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3), 344–362. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.344
  • Gatarik, E., & Born, R. (2015). Managing network economies: The competitive advantage of commons as ecosystems of innovation. Journal of Organizational Transformation and Social Change, 12(3), 287–307. Taylor & Francis. Oxford. doi: 10.1080/14779633.2015.1101246
  • Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.18803920
  • Gupta, A. K., Tesluk, P. E., & Taylor, S. M. (2007). Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science, 18(6), 885–897. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0337
  • Hamel, G. (2012). What Matters Now. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Haugeland, J. (1981). Semantic Engines. MIT Press, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J., & Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities. Understanding Dynamic Change in Organizations.
  • Henderson, A. D., & Stern, I. (2004). Selecion-based learning: The coevolution of internal and external selection in high-velocity environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 39–75.
  • Herzberg, F. (1987). One more time: how do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 6–16.
  • Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities und core rigidity: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111–126. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250131009
  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250141009
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • McClelland, D. C., & Winter, D. G. (1969). Motivational Economic Achievement. Free Press. New York.
  • McKelvey, B., & Aldrich, H. E. (1983). Populations, natural selection, and applied organizational science. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 101–128. doi: 10.2307/2392389
  • Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 116–138. doi: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509
  • Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The simplicity of competitive repertoires. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 419–439. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<419::AID-SMJ818>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Moravcsik, J. M. E. (2004). The Ties that Bind. Budapest: Central European University Press.
  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 74–82.
  • Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 263–280. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.20786062
  • Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32. doi: 10.1002/job.1937
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Avebury.
  • Schreyögg, G., Sydow, J., & Koch, J. (2003). Organisatorische Pfade - Von der Pfadabhängigkeit zur Pfadkreation. In Schreyögg, G. & Sydow, J. (Eds), Managementforschung 13. Strategische Prozesse und Pfade: 257–294. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  • Senge, P. M. (1999). The Dance of Change: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Crown Business.
  • Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014a). In search of phronesis: Leadership and the art of judgment. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2), 224–243. doi: 10.5465/amle.2013.0201
  • Shotter, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). Performing phronesis: On the way to engaged judgment. Management Learning, 45(4), 377–396. doi: 10.1177/1350507614541196
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640
  • Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1147–1161. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.3.CO;2-I
  • Tsoukas, H., & Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Organizations as knowledge systems: Knowledge, learning and dynamic capabilities. New York: Palgrave.
  • Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge?. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00268
  • Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
  • Von Krogh, G. (2003). Knowledge sharing and the communal resource. In Easterby-Smith, M. & Lyles, M. A., The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: 372–392, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. 2nd edition. New York: Random House.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Winter, S. G. (2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 981–996. doi: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<981::AID-SMJ125>3.0.CO;2-4
  • Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. doi: 10.1002/smj.318
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.