Determining optimal meeting frequency: a bargaining solution to improve a poorly functioning PPP industry under budget constraints

References

• Aadland, D., & Sterbenz, F. P. (2015). The economics of emergency meetings. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1019–1037. doi: 10.1111/ecin.12181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aros, S. K., & Gibbons, D. E. (2018). Exploring communication media options in an inter-organizational disaster response coordination network using agent-based simulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(2), 451–465. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.013. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccouche, S., Hadriche, M., & Omri, A. (2014). Multiple directorships and board meeting frequency: Evidence from France. Applied Financial Economics, 24(14), 983–992. doi: 10.1080/09603107.2014.920475
   Google Scholar
• Basar, T., & Jan, G. (1999). Dynamic noncooperative game theory. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beatrice, D. F. (1991). Inter-agency coordination. Administration in Social Work, 14(4), 45–59. doi: 10.1300/J147v14n04_04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A. C., & Wainwright, K. (2005). Fundamental methods of mathematical economics. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, J., & Van De Mieroop, D. (2010). Doing’ ethos: A discursive approach to the strategic deployment and negotiation of identities in meetings. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), 2449–2461. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curnin, S., Owen, C., Paton, D., & Brooks, B. (2015). A theoretical framework for negotiating the path of emergency management multi-agency coordination. Applied Ergonomics, 47, 300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1982). Marxism, functionalism, and game theory: A debate. Theory and Society, 11(4), 453–482. doi: 10.1007/bf00162324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmakopoulou, N. (2002). Using an integrated theoretical framework for understanding inter-agency collaboration in the special educational needs field. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(1), 49–59. doi: 10.1080/08856250110099015
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. (1998). A voice in the wilderness: Meetings as ritual in a cross-cultural context. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 583–601. doi: 10.1080/095183998236485
   Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. O., Tomori, O., Wibulpolprasert, S., Jha, A. K., Frenk, J., Moon, S., … Leung, G. M. (2016). Toward a common secure future: Four global commissions in the wake of Ebola. PLOS Medicine, 13(5), e1002042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco, G. (2011). Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from Italian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(3), 208–229. doi: 10.1108/02686901111113172
   Google Scholar
• Guardner, R. (2003). Games for business and economics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M., & Wistow, G. (1999). In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in the public sector. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(2), 235–260. doi: 10.1080/14719039900000005
   Google Scholar
• Lao National Tourism Administration. (2006). Lao PDR Tourism Strategy 2006-2020. Vientiane. Retrieved from https://www.tourismlaos.org/files/files/Lao%20PDR%20Tourism%20Strategy%202006-2020%20in%20English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., Urry, J., & Axhausen, K. (2008). Coordinating face-to-face meetings in mobile network societies. Information, Communication & Society, 11(5), 640–658. doi: 10.1080/13691180802126752
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Chan, H. S. (2009). Clean air in urban China: The case of inter-agency coordination in chongqing's blue sky program. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), 55–67. doi: 10.1002/pad.501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R. W., & Dutton, M. (2008). Inter-agency cooperation and new approaches to employability. Social Policy & Administration, 42(7), 715–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Q. (2016). Activation reform and inter-agency co-operation – Local consequences of mixed modes of governance in Sweden. Social Policy & Administration, 50(1), 19–38. doi: 10.1111/spol.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maschler, M., Solan, E., & Zamir, S. (2013). Game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, R. A. (2009). Game theory and public policy. London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Merindol, V. (2005). Defense RDT&E and knowledge management: A new enquiry into public and public‐private coordination. Defense & Security Analysis, 21(2), 159–177. doi: 10.1080/1475179052000343991
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. (1997). Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, E., Madeleine, A., & Alan, D. (2000). Inter-professional collaboration and conceptualisations of practice. Children & Society, 14(5), 355–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2000.tb00190.x
   Google Scholar
• Peter, T., Karen, S., & Gyöngyi, K. (2017). The humanitarian common logistic operating picture: A solution to the inter-agency coordination challenge. Disasters, 41(1), 77–100. doi: 10.1111/disa.12193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayama, H., Fan, L. T., & Fan, L. S. (1976). On Lagrange multipliers and constraints I. Lagrangian approach. International Journal of Systems Science, 7(11), 1283–1298. doi: 10.1080/00207727608942004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263. doi: 10.2308/acch.2009.23.3.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, B., & Higa, K. (2005). Meeting scheduling: Face-to-face, automatic scheduler, and email based coordination. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 137–159. doi: 10.1207/s15327744joce1502_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steven, C., Christine, O., Douglas, P., Cain, T., & David, P. (2015). Role clarity, Swift trust and multi-agency coordination. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 23(1), 29–35. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., & Munro, L. (2007). The impact of audit committee existence and audit committee meeting frequency on the external audit: Perceptions of Australian auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 11(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00356.x
   Google Scholar
• Vivacqua, A. S., Garcia, A. C. B., & Gomes, A. (2011). BOO: Behavior-oriented ontology to describe participant dynamics in collocated design meetings. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(2), 1139–1147. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xiong, W., Wu, G., & Zhu, D. (2018). Public-private partnership in Public Administration discipline: A literature review. Public Management Review, 20(2), 293–316. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, F., Gao, S., Li, W., & Lv, H. (2012). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 425–444. doi: 10.1108/02686901211218003
   Google Scholar