885
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Governmental origin: why NTBFs grow in a transitional economy

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 379-398 | Received 23 Jan 2017, Accepted 09 Sep 2019, Published online: 27 Feb 2020

References

  • Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter? Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141–154. doi:10.1023/A:1008138709724
  • Azkia, M., & Hooglund, E. (2011). Rural development in contemporary Iran 1950-2010. IAU International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 223–239.
  • Bannier, C. E., & Metz, S. (2010). Are SMEs large firms en miniature? Evidence from a growth analysis (No. 142). Working paper series, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt a. M.
  • Bannier, C. E., & Zahn, S. (2012). Are SMEs large firms in miniature? Evidence from the growth of German SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 17(2), 220–248. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2012.048848
  • Baum, J. A., & Oliver, C. (1996). Toward an institutional ecology of organizational founding. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1378–1427. doi:10.5465/257003
  • Becchetti, L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19(4), 291–306.
  • Carlsson, B., & Taymaz, E. (1994). Flexible technology and industrial structure in the US. Small Business Economics, 6(3), 193–209. doi:10.1007/BF01108288
  • Carrizosa, M. T. (2006). Firm growth, persistence and multiplicity of equilibria: An analysis of Spanish manufacturing and service industries (Doctoral dissertation). Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
  • Chorev, S., & Anderson, A. R. (2006). Success in Israeli high-tech start-ups; Critical factors and process. Technovation, 26(2), 162–174. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.014
  • Christensen, B. J. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.
  • Coad, A., & Reid, A. (2012). The role of technology and technology-based firms in economic development. Glasgow: Final Report for Scottish Enterprise. Technopolis Group.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. California: Sage.
  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Daftary, F. (1973). Development planning in Iran: A historical survey. Iranian Studies, 6(4), 176–228. doi:10.1080/00210867308701447
  • Dennis, D. W., & Perloff, J. M. (2004). Modern industrial organization. Boston: Pearson.
  • Douma, S., & Schreuder, H. (2012). Economic approaches to organizations. London: Pearson.
  • Fadahunsi, A. (2012). The growth of small businesses: Towards a research agenda. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 4, 105–115.
  • Feige, E. L. (1997). Underground activity and institutional change: Productive, protective and predatory behavior in transition economies. Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies, 21, 34.
  • Elyasi. s. (2015). Retrieved from financialtribune http://financialtribune.com/articles/domesticeconomy/12018/majlis-allocates-300m-knowledge-basedfirms
  • Fischer, S., Sahay, R., & Végh, C. A. (1996). Economies in transition: The beginnings of growth. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 229–233.
  • Geroski, P. A. (1999). The growth of firms in theory and in practice. In N. Foss, & V. Mahnke, (Eds.), New Directions in Economic Strategy Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ghazinoory, S., Dastranj, N., Saghafi, F., Kulshreshtha, A., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2017). Technology roadmapping architecture based on technological learning: Case study of social banking in Iran. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 231–242. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.018
  • Ghazinoory, S., Soofi, A. S., & Farnoodi, S. (2013). The national innovation system of Iran: A functional and institutional analysis. In Science and innovations in Iran (pp. 57–86). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.
  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427. doi:10.1177/0149206309343469
  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. California: SAGE.
  • Khan, K. S. (2011). Determinants of firm growth: An empirical examination of SMEs in Gujranwala, Gujarat and Sialkot districts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(1), 1389–1409.
  • Lee, Y. J. (2010). Technology strategy by growth stage of technology-based venture companies. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(6), 216–234.
  • Licht, G., & Nerlinger, E. (1998). New technology-based firms in Germany: A survey of the recent evidence. Research Policy, 26(9), 1005–1022. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00056-5
  • Lippit, G. L., & Schmidt, W. H. (1967). Crises in developing organization. Harvard Business, 45, 102–112.
  • McGee, J. E. (1994). Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of managerial experience. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance. (2015). Retrieved from http://mefa.gov.ir/
  • Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Blackwell: Oxford University Press.
  • Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
  • Ragin, C. C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitive and quantitive strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ranjbar, H. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: Getting started. Tehran: Journal of Army University of Medical Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (in Persian)
  • Reed, M. (2006). Organizational theorizing: a historically contested terrain. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy & T. B. Lawrence (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 19–54). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781848608030.n2
  • Rihoux, B., & Grimm, H. (2006). Innovative comparative methods for policy analysis: Beyond the quantitative divide. NewYork, NY: Springer.
  • Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organization theory: Concepts and cases. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sattari, S. (2015). Retrieved from isti http://en.isti.ir/index.aspx?fkeyid=&siteid=30&pageid=7525
  • ShahAbadi, A. (2009). Private sector capital stock and endogenous growth-case study. IRAN.Mofid Journal, 31, 101–122.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
  • Sutton, J. (1996). Gibrat’s legacy. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • The World Development Indicator, (2018). World bank Retrieved from public data. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&country=IRN
  • Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C., & Freeman, S. J. (1998). Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262. doi:10.1177/014920639802400205
  • Wilbon, A. D. (1999). An empirical investigation of technology strategy in computer software initial public offering firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(2), 147–169. doi:10.1016/S0923-4748(99)00003-X