Revisiting bank failure in the United States: a fuzzy-set analysis

References

• Boyd, J. H., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). Size and performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31(1), 47–67. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(93)90016-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Wan, G., & Wang, F. (2011). Predicting financial distress of Chinese listed companies using rough set theory and support vector machine. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 28(1), 95–109. doi:10.1142/S0217595911003077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, P., Climent, F., & Momparler, A. (2019). Predicting failure in the U.S. banking sector: An extreme gradient boosting approach. International Review of Economics & Finance, 61, 304–323. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2012). Qualitative work and the testing and development of theory: lessons from a study combining cross-case and within-case analysis via Ragin's QCA [53 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(2), Art.4, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120247.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D., & Laeven, L. (2012). Credit booms and lending standards: evidence from the subprime mortgage market. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44(2–3), 367–384. March–April 2012, doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demyanyk, Y., & Hasan, I. (2010). Financial crises and bank failures: A review of prediction methods. Omega, 38(5), 315–324. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2009.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dul, J. (2016). Necessary condition analysis (NCA): Logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 10–52. doi:10.1177/1094428115584005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusa, A. (2019). QCA with R. A comprehensive resource. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dusa, A., & Alrik, T. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis with R. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ecer, F. (2013). Comparing the bank failure prediction performance of neural networks and support vector machines: the Turkish case. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 26(3), 81–98. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekinci, A., & Erdal, H. I. (2017). Forecasting bank failure: Base learners, ensembles and hybrid ensembles. Computational Economics, 49(4), 677–686. doi:10.1007/s10614-016-9623-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, T. (2013). Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from http://thomaselliott.me/pdfs/fsqca.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eygi, B. (2013). Prediction of bankruptcy using support vector machines: an application to bank bankruptcy. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(8), 1543–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDIC. Bank Failures in Brief. www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/bank/index.html. Retrieved December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fejér-Király, G., (2015). Bankruptcy prediction: A survey on evolution, critiques, and solutions. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, 3, 93–108. doi:10.1515/auseb-2015-0006
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S., Woodside, A., & Marshall, R. (2013). Critical tests of multiple theories of cultures’ consequences. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 679–704. doi:10.1177/0047287512475218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Johnstone, D., & Wilson, R. (2015). An empirical evaluation of the performance of binary classifiers in the prediction of credit ratings changes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 56, 72–85. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P. R., & Ravi, V. (2007). Bankruptcy prediction in banks and firms via statistical and intelligent techniques–A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 180, 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, W. R., Looney, S. W., & Wansley, J. W. (1986). An application of the Cox proportional hazards model to bank failure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 10, 511–531. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(86)80003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, H. H., & Viviani, J.-L. (2018). Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios. Research in International Business and Finance, 44, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longest, K. C., & Vaisey, S. (2008). Fuzzy: A program for performing qualitative comparative analyses (QCA) in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 8(1), 79–104. doi:10.1177/1536867X0800800106
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. A., & Pifer, H. W. (1970). Prediction of bank failures. The Journal of Finance, 25(4), 853–868. doi:10.2307/2325421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moldovan, D., & Mutu, S. (2015). A cluster analysis on the default determinants in the European banking sector. In W. Abramowicz (Ed.), Business information systems workshops (BIS 2015). Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 228, pp. 64–74. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Momparler, A., Carmona, P., & Climent, F. (2016). Banking failure prediction: a boosting classification tree approach. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 45(1), 63–91. doi:10.1080/02102412.2015.1118903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D., Delen, D., & Meng, Y. (2012). Comparative analysis of data mining methods for bankruptcy prediction. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 464–473. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., Grofman, B. (2006). It might look like a regression equation … but it's not! An intuitive approach to the presentation of QCA and FS/QCA results. COMPASSS working paper n. 39. http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/SchneiderGrofman2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2007). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen/Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. doi:10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
   Google Scholar
• SirElkhatim, M. A., & Salim, N. (2015). Prediction of banks financial distress. Journal of Engineering and Computer Sciences, 16(1), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, S., & Yu, Y. (2017). Financial ratios and bankruptcy predictions: An international evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 510–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B. (2012). The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 168–198. doi:10.1177/0049124112442142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zięba, M., Tomczak, S. K., & Tomczak, J. M. (2016). Ensemble boosted trees with synthetic features generation in application to bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 58, 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar