2,780
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 3185-3208 | Received 01 Dec 2018, Accepted 14 Oct 2019, Published online: 25 Nov 2019

References

  • Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
  • Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
  • Deng, X. M., & Gao, H. (2019). TODIM method for multiple attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1769–1780. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179240
  • Deng, X. M., Wei, G. W., Gao, H., & Wang, J. (2018). Models for safety assessment of construction project with some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators. IEEE Access, 6, 52105–52137. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869414
  • Du, Y., & Liu, P. D. (2011). Extended fuzzy VIKOR method with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Information–An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 2575–2583.
  • Gao, H. (2018). Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35, 2229–2245. doi:10.3233/JIFS-172262
  • Ghadikolaei, A. S., Madhoushi, M., & Divsalar, M. (2018). Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Neural Computing and Applications, 30, 3589–3602. doi:10.1007/s00521-017-2944-5
  • Gomes, L., & Lima, M. (1979). TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16, 113–127.
  • Gomes, L., & Rangel, L. A. D. (2009). An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 204–211.
  • Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M. K., & Grover, N. (2019). A generalized TOPSIS method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making considering different scenarios of attributes weight information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(2), 369–387. doi:10.1007/s40815-018-0563-7
  • Hashemi, H., Mousavi, S. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Chalekaee, A., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A new group decision model based on grey-intuitionistic fuzzy-ELECTRE and VIKOR for contractor assessment problem. Sustainability, 10, 1635. doi:10.3390/su10051635
  • Huang, Y. H., & Wei, G. W. (2018). TODIM method for Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35, 901–915. doi:10.3233/JIFS-171636
  • Huang, Y. H., Wei, G. W., & Wei, C. (2017). VIKOR method for interval neutrosophic multiple attribute group decision-making. Information, 8(4), 144. doi:10.3390/info8040144
  • Ju, D. W., Ju, Y. B., & Wang, A. H. (2018). Multiple attribute group decision making based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operator under single-valued neutrosophic interval 2-tuple linguistic environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34, 2579–2595. doi:10.3233/JIFS-17496
  • Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
  • Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y., & Hwang, C. L. (1994). TOPSIS for MODM. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486–500. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8
  • Li, X. Y., & Wei, G. W. (2014). GRA method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information under hesitant fuzzy setting. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27, 1095–1105.
  • Li, Z. X., Gao, H., & Wei, G. W. (2018). Methods for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Hamy mean operators. Symmetry, 10(11), 574. doi:10.3390/sym10110574
  • Li, Z. X., & Lu, M. (2019). Some novel similarity and distance and measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1781–1799. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179241
  • Liu, P. D., & You, X. L. (2018). Some linguistic neutrosophic Hamy mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. PLoS One, 13, e0193027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193027
  • Lu, J. P., & Wei, C. (2019). TODIM method for performance appraisal on social-integration-based rural reconstruction with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1731–1740. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179236
  • Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Makui, A. (2016). An extended fuzzy VIKOR for group decision-making based on fuzzy distance to supplier selection. Scientia Iranica, 23(4), 1879–1892. doi:10.24200/sci.2016.3934
  • Narayanamoorthy, S., Geetha, S., Rakkiyappan, R., & Joo, Y. H. (2019). Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.015
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
  • Pamucar, D., & Cirovic, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 3016–3028.
  • Park, J. H., Cho, H. J., & Kwun, Y. C. (2011). Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 10(3), 233–253. doi:10.1007/s10700-011-9102-9
  • Qin, J. D., Liu, X. W., & Pedrycz, W. (2015). An extended VIKOR method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 86, 116–130. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.025
  • Roy, J., Sharma, H. K., Kar, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Saparauskas, J. (2019). An extended COPRAS model for multi-criteria decision-making problems and its application in web-based hotel evaluation and selection. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 219–253. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2018.1543054
  • Sharma, H. K., Kumari, K., & Kar, S. (2019). Short-term forecasting of air passengers based on the hybrid rough set and the double exponential smoothing model. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 25, 1–14. doi:10.31209/2018.100000036
  • Smarandache, F. (1999). A unifying field in logics. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set and logic. Rehoboth, NM: American Research Press.
  • Tang, M., Wang, J., Lu, J. P., Wei, G. W., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematics, 7, 344.
  • Tang, X. Y., & Wei, G. W. (2018). Models for green supplier selection in green supply chain management with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information. IEEE Access, 6, 18042–18060. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817551
  • Tang, X. Y., Wei, G. W., & Gao, H. (2019a). Models for multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators and their application to green suppliers selection. Informatica, 30(1), 153–186. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2019.202
  • Tang, X. Y., Wei, G. W., & Gao, H. (2019b). Pythagorean fuzzy Muirhead mean operators in multiple attribute decision making for evaluating of emerging technology commercialization. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1667–1696. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2019.1638808
  • Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct, 4, 410–413.
  • Wang, J., Gao, H., & Lu, M. (2019). Approaches to strategic supplier selection under interval neutrosophic environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1707–1730. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179235
  • Wang, J., Gao, H., & Wei, G. (2018). Some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number Muirhead mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 31, 409–439. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2018.1552320
  • Wang, J., Gao, H., Wei, G. W., & Wei, Y. (2019). Methods for multiple-attribute group decision making with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information and their applications to the selection of green suppliers. Symmetry, 11(1), 56. doi:10.3390/sym11010056
  • Wang, J., Tang, X. Y., & Wei, G. W. (2018). Models for multiple attribute decision-making with dual generalized single-valued neutrosophic Bonferroni mean operators. Algorithms, 11, 2. doi:10.3390/a11010002
  • Wang, J., Wei, G. W., & Lu, M. (2018a). An extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making with triangular fuzzy neutrosophic numbers. Symmetry, 10(10), 497. doi:10.3390/sym10100497
  • Wang, J., Wei, G. W., & Lu, M. (2018b). TODIM method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Symmetry, 10, 486. doi:10.3390/sym10100486
  • Wang, J., Wei, G. W., & Wei, Y. (2018). Models for green supplier selection with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number Bonferroni mean operators. Symmetry, 10(5), 131. doi:10.3390/sym10050131
  • Wang, L., Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q., & Li, L. (2018). Picture fuzzy normalized projection-based VIKOR method for the risk evaluation of construction project. Applied Soft Computing, 64, 216–226.
  • Wang, P., Wang, J., & Wei, G. W. (2019). EDAS method for multiple criteria group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic enviroment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1597–1608. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179223
  • Wang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G. W., & Wei, C. (2019). Similarity measures of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based on cosine function and their applications. Mathematics, 7, 340.
  • Wang, R. (2019). Research on the application of the financial investment risk appraisal models with some interval number Muirhead mean operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 1741–1752.
  • Wei, G. W. (2017). Picture uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Kybernetes, 46(10), 1777–1800. doi:10.1108/K-01-2017-0025
  • Wei, G. W. (2018). TODIM method for picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Informatica, 29(3), 555–566. doi:10.15388/Informatica.2018.181
  • Wei, G. W. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Fundamenta Informaticae, 166(1), 57–85. doi:10.3233/FI-2019-1794
  • Wei, G. W., Wang, J., Wei, C., Wei, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access, 7, 86697–86716.
  • Wei, G. W., Wang, R., Wang, J., Wei, C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Methods for evaluating the technological innovation capability for the high-tech enterprises with generalized interval neutrosophic number Bonferroni mean operators. IEEE Access, 7, 86473–86492. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925702
  • Wei, G. W., & Zhang, Z. P. (2019). Some single-valued neutrosophic Bonferroni power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10(3), 863–882.
  • Wei, Y., Qin, S., Li, X., Zhu, S., & Wei, G. (2019). Oil price fluctuation, stock market and macroeconomic fundamentals: Evidence from China before and after the financial crisis. Finance Research Letters, 30, 23–29.
  • Wei, Y., Yu, Q., Liu, J., & Cao, Y. (2018). Hot money and China’s stock market volatility: Further evidence using the GARCH-MIDAS model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 492, 923–930.
  • Wu, L. P., Gao, H., & Wei, C. (2019). VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 37, 2001–2008. doi:10.3233/JIFS-179262
  • Wu, L. P., Wang, J., & Gao, H. (2019). Models for competiveness evaluation of tourist destination with some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamy mean operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36, 5693–5709.
  • Wu, L. P., Wei, G. W., Gao, H., & Wei, Y. (2018). Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Hamy mean operators and their application for evaluating the elderly tourism service quality in tourism destination. Mathematics, 6(12), 294. doi:10.3390/math6120294
  • Wu, Q., Wu, P., Zhou, L. G., Chen, H. Y., & Guan, X. J. (2018). Some new Hamacher aggregation operators under single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 116, 144–162. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.12.024
  • Wu, S. J., Wang, J., Wei, G. W., & Wei, Y. (2018). Research on construction engineering project risk assessment with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic Hamy mean operators. Sustainability, 10, 1536.
  • Wu, Z. B., Xu, J. P., Jiang, X. L., & Zhong, L. (2019). Two MAGDM models based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets with possibility distributions: VIKOR and TOPSIS. Information Sciences, 473, 101–120.
  • Xian, S. D., Chai, J. H., & Guo, H. L. (2019). Z Linguistic-induced ordered weighted averaging operator for multiple attribute group decision-making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(2), 271–296.
  • Xu, Z. S., & Chen, Q. (2011). A multi-criteria decision making procedure based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 20(2), 217–228.
  • Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
  • Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1222–1230. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005
  • Yang, W., Pang, Y. F., Shi, J. R., & Wang, C. J. (2018). Linguistic hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making method based on VIKOR. Neural Computing & Applications, 29, 613–626.
  • Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Coulibaly, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 376–392.
  • Ye, J. (2018). Multiple attribute decision-making methods based on the expected value and the similarity measure of hesitant neutrosophic linguistic numbers. Cognitive Computation, 10(3), 454–463. doi:10.1007/s12559-017-9535-8
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. In Information and control (Vol. 8, pp. 338–356). doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Vilutienė, T., & Lepkova, N. (2017). Integrated group fuzzy multi-criteria model: Case of facilities management strategy selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 82, 317–331.
  • Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy Bonferroni means for multi-criteria decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1831–1840. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.7