Environmental attitudes and impacts of privatization on R&D, environment and welfare in a mixed duopoly

References

• Ben Youssef, S., & Dinar, Z. (2011). Regulation of a duopoly and environmental R&D. Environmental Economics, 2(3), 47–51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235977651_Regulation_of_a_duopoly_and_environmental_RD
   Google Scholar
• Bréchet, T., & Meunier, G. (2014). Are clean technology and environmental quality conflicting policy goals?. Resource and Energy Economics, 38, 61–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Li, W., & Lu, X. (2015). Government engagement, environmental policy, and environmental performance: Evidence from the most polluting Chinese listed firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., & Nie, P. Y. (2014). Duopoly innovation under product externalities. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.952092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1807173?seq=1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. A., Ferreira, F. (2013). Privatization in a mixed duopoly with environmental taxes. AIP Conference Proceedings, (1), 1558–-1561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4825822
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell, G. E., & Lo, C. W. (2001). Organizational membership and environmental ethics: a comparison of managers in state-owned firms, collectives, private firms and joint ventures in China. World Development, 29(11), 1941–1956. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00078-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moltó, M. J., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Zikos, V. (2011). R&D subsidies, spillovers and privatization in mixed markets. Southern Economic Journal, 78, 233–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-78.1.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moltó, M. J., & Varvarigos, D. (2013). Emission taxes and the adoption of cleaner technologies: The case of environmentally conscious consumers. Resource and Energy Economics, 35(4), 486–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haruna, S., & Goel, R. K. (2019). Optimal pollution control in a mixed oligopoly with research spillovers. Australian Economic Papers, 58(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettige, H., Huq, M., Pargal, S., & Wheeler, D. (1996). Determinants of pollution abatement in developing countries. World Development, 24(12), 1891–1904. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00076-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, K. (2011). Emission quota versus emission tax in a mixed duopoly. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 13(1), 43–63. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10018-010-0003-x https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0003-x
   Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2004). Environmental tax, trade, and privatization. The Kyoto Economic Review, 73(2), 109–120. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32134786_Environmental_Tax_Trade_and_Privatization
   Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2006a). Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 29(2), 225–233. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11149-006-6037-0 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-6037-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2006b). Trade liberalization, consumption externalities and the environment: A mixed duopoly approach. Economics Bulletin, 17(5), 1–9. http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2006/Volume17/EB-06Q00001A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ohori, S. (2014). Price and quantity competition in a mixed duopoly with emission tax. Theoretical Economics Letters, 04(02), 133–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2014.42020
   Google Scholar
• Pal, R., & Saha, B. (2015). Pollution tax, partial privatization and environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 40, 19–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, J. C., Yang, L., & Zhou, Y. (2013). Privatization and environmental pollution in a mixed duopoly. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci, 31(2), 163–192. https://hrcak.srce.hr/112386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky, J. (1998). R&D competition in a mixed duopoly under uncertainty and easy imitation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26, 415–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1998.1541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skea, J. (1995). Environmental technology. In H. Folmer, H. L. Gabel, and H. Opschoor (eds.), Principles of environmental and resource economics. A guide for students and decision-makers (pp. 389–412), Aldershot. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-1761
   Google Scholar
• Song, Z. J., & Sun, Q. L. (2012). The optimal R&D investment and subsidy under the perspective of emission reduction. Science Research Management, 33(10), 80–89. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KYGL201210009.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tao, A. Y., Zhu, Y. J., & Zou, X. Q. (2019). Efficiency comparison of unit and ad valorem taxation in mixed duopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 473–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1555048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. H., Wang, C. C., & Chiou, J. R. (2016). Can privatization be a catalyst for environmental R&D and result in a cleaner environment?. Resource and Energy Economics, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. F. S., & Wang, J. (2009). Environmental taxes in a differentiated mixed duopoly. Economic Systems, 33(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. F. S., Wang, Y. C., & Zhao, L. H. (2009). Privatization and the environment in a mixed duopoly with pollution abatement. Economics Bulletin, 29(4), 3112–3119. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00590
   Google Scholar
• Xie, S. X., Wang, X. S., & Shang, L. Y. (2012). Mixed duopoly competition, pollutant emission and environmental taxes. Journal of Shandong University of Finance, 117(1), 59–64. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SDCY201201010.htm
   Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q. (2018). The impact of spillovers on strategic R&D under uncertainty. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 428–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1432373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q. (2019). Partial privatization policy and the R&D risk choice in a mixed duopoly market. The Manchester School, 87(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., & Wang, X. (2019). Environmental R&D subsidy, spillovers and privatization in a mixed duopoly. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2989–3015. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1658530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q., Tan, T. T., Wang, X., & Liu, L. L. (2020). Environmental R&D and privatization in a mixed duopoly market. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. L., Cho, S., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot–Bertrand comparison. Economic Modelling, 55, 73–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. L., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Environmental policies with excess burden of taxation in free-entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 58, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. C., & Nie, P. Y. (2015). R&D subsidies under asymmetric Cournot competition. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 830–842. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1088791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar