777
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Large-scale consensus with endo-confidence under probabilistic linguistic circumstance and its application

, , &
Pages 2039-2072 | Received 30 Oct 2020, Accepted 13 May 2021, Published online: 28 Jun 2021

References

  • Bashir, Z., Rashid, T., & Xu, Z. S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference relation based on α–normalization with self confidence in decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(3), 3421–3435. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17380
  • Ding, Z. G., Chen, X., Dong, Y. C., & Herrera, F. (2019). Consensus reaching in social network DeGroot Model: The roles of the self-confidence and node degree. Information Sciences, 486, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.028
  • Fang, R., Liao, H. C., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). Probabilistic cutting method for group decision making with general probabilistic linguistic preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, Technical Report.
  • Gou, X. J., Liao, H. C., Wang, X. X., Xu, Z. S., & Herrera, F. (2019). Consensus based on multiplicative consistent double hierarchy linguistic preferences: Venture capital in real estate market. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 24(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.10431
  • Gou, X. J., Xu, Z. S., & Herrera, F. (2018). Consensus reaching process for large-scale group decision making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 157, 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.008
  • Gou, X. J., Xu, Z. S., Liao, H. C., & Herrera, F. (2021). Consensus model handling minority opinions and noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision-making under double hierarchy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51(1), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.2985069
  • Gou, X. J., Xu, Z. S., Wang, X. X., & Liao, H. C. (2021). Managing consensus reaching process with self-confident double hierarchy linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 20(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09331-y
  • Guha, D., & Chakraborty, D. (2011). Fuzzy multi attribute group decision making method to achieve consensus under the consideration of degrees of confidence of experts’ opinions. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.11.017
  • Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.705
  • Liu, W. Q., Dong, Y. C., Chiclana, F., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9254-8
  • Liu, X., Xu, Y. J., Ge, Y., Zhang, W. K., & Herrera, F. (2019). A group decision making approach considering self-confidence behaviors and its application in environmental pollution emergency management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030385
  • Liu, X., Xu, Y. J., & Herrera, F. (2019). Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors. Information Fusion, 52, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.03.001
  • Liu, X., Xu, Y. J., Montes, R., Dong, Y. C., & Herrera, F. (2019). Analysis of self-confidence indices-based additive consistency for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence and its application in group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(5), 920–946. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22081
  • Liu, X., Xu, Y. J., Montes, R., & Herrera, F. (2019). Social network group decision making: Managing self-confidence-based consensus model with the dynamic importance degree of experts and trust-based feedback mechanism. Information Sciences, 505, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.050
  • Liu, W. Q., Zhang, H. J., Chen, X., & Yu, S. (2018). Managing consensus and self-confidence in multiplicative preference relations in group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.031
  • Mi, X. M., Liao, H. C., Wu, X. L., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic information fusion: A survey on aggregation operators in terms of principles, definitions, classifications, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(3), 529–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22216
  • Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
  • Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
  • Song, Y. M., & Li, G. X. (2019). A large-scale group decision-making with incomplete multi-granular probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in sustainable supplier selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(5), 827–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1458017
  • Tang, M., & Liao, H. C. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 100, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141
  • Tian, X. L., Niu, M. L., Zhang, W. K., Li, L. H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2021). A novel TODIM based on prospect theory to select green supplier with Q-rung orthopair fuzzy set. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(2), 284–310. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12736
  • Ureña, R., Chiclana, F., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.020
  • Wang, H., Liao, H. C., Huang, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2020). Determining consensus thresholds for group decision making with preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1779626
  • Wang, J. Q., Wu, J. T., Wang, J., Zhang, H. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2014). Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Information Sciences, 288, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.034
  • Wei, G. W., Lu, J. P., Wei, C., & Wu, J. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic GRA method for multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(4), 4712–4721. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191416
  • Wu, X. L., Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., Arian, H., & Francisco, H. (2018). Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: A multi-criteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda rule. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(6), 3688–3702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2843330
  • Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2019). A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044
  • Xu, X. H., Du, Z. J., Chen, X. H., & Cai, C. G. (2019). Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making: A novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors. Information Sciences, 477, 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.058
  • Xu, Z. S., He, Y., & Wang, X. Z. (2019). An overview of probabilistic-based expressions for qualitative decision-making: techniques, comparisons and developments. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10(6), 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-0830-9
  • Xu, Z. S. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166(1–4), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I, II. Information Science, 8, III.
  • Zha, Q. B., Liang, H. M., Kou, G., Dong, Y. C., & Yu, S. (2019). A feedback mechanism with bounded confidence-based optimization approach for consensus reaching in multiple attribute large-scale group decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 6(5), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2019.2938258
  • Zhang, H. J., Li, C. C., Liu, Y. T., & Dong, Y. C. (2021). Modelling personalized individual semantics and consensus in comparative linguistic expression preference relations with self-confidence: An optimization-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(3), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2957259
  • Zhang, X. L., Liao, H. C., Xu, B., & Xiong, M. F. (2020). A probabilistic linguistic-based deviation method for multi-expert qualitative decision making with aspirations. Applied Soft Computing, 93, 106362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106362
  • Zhang, Y. X., Xu, Z. S., Wang, H., & Liao, H. C. (2016). Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 49, 817–833.
  • Zhang, Z., Kou, X. Y., Yu, W. Y., & Gao, Y. (2020). Consistency improvement for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence: An application in two-sided matching decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1748529