Public monopoly versus mixed oligopoly: product differentiation and social efficiency

References

• Anderson, S., & Neven, D. (1991). Cournot competition yields spatial agglomeration. International Economic Review, 32(4), 793–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beato, P., & Mas-Colell, A. (1984). The marginal cost pricing as a regulation mechanism in mixed market. In M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, & H. Tulkens (Eds.), The performance of public enterprises (pp. 81–100). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Cremer, H., Marchand, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1991). Mixed oligopoly with differentiated products. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(91)90004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d'Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J.-F. (1979). On hotelling’s ‘stability in competition’. Econometrica, 47(5), 1145–1050. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(1), 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbono, F., Denicolò, V., & Scarpa, C. (1996). Quality choice in a vertically differentiated mixed duopoly. Economic Notes, 25, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0267-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilo, I. (1994). Mixed duopoly under vertical differentiation. Annales D’economie et de Statistique, 33, 92–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. H., Thisse, J.-F., & Weskamp, A. (1989). Spatial discrimination: Bertrand versus cournot in a model of location choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 19(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90035-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R., & Wiens, E. (1980). Government enterprise: An instrument for the internal regulation of industry. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/134624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. S., & Ye, G. (2009). Mixed oligopoly, sequential entry, and spatial price discrimination. Economic Inquiry, 47(3), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214
   Google Scholar
• Kitahara, M., & Matsumura, T. (2013). Mixed duopoly, product differentiation and competition. The Manchester School, 81(5), 730–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2012.02329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H., & Hwang, H.-S. (2003). Partial ownership for the public firm and competition. The Japanese Economic Review, 54(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5876.00261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T., & Sato, S. (2018). An analysis of entry-then-privatization model: Welfare and policy implications. Journal of Economics, 123(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-017-0559-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Matsumura, T., & Zeng, C. (2020). The relationship between privatization and corporate taxation policies. Journal of Economics, 132, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Wang, X., & Zeng, C. (2020). Endogenous horizontal product differentiation in a mixed uopoly. Review of Industrial Organization, 56(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-019-09705-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00051-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics, 84(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-004-0098-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Matsushima, N. (2003). Mixed duopoly with product differentiation: Sequential choice of location. Australian Economic Papers, 42(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00183
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, T. (2014). Mixed duopoly, location choice, and shadow cost of public funds. Southern Economic Journal, 82, 140827142349001–140827142349429. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2013.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsushima, N., & Matsumura, T. (2003). Mixed oligopoly and spatial agglomeration. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique, 36(1), 62–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.00004
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, W. C., & Schneider, N. (1966). Government firms in oligopoly industries: A short-run analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(3), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, P. (2014). Effects of capacity constraint on mixed duopoly. Journal of Economics, 112(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-013-0362-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, P., & Yang, Y. (2020). Cost-reduction innovation under mixed economy. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(7), 1195–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, P. (2004). The effects of government ownership on banking lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2002.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1982). Relaxing price competition through produce differentiation. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vives, X. (2008). Innovation and competitive pressure. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(3), 419–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2008.00356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Nie, P., & Cui, T. (2019). Endogenous product substitutability strategy under duopoly. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(6), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, M. (2008). Pork price and mixed oligopoly market, firm’s behavior - data and theoretical analysis. In J. Wang & M. Watanabe (Eds.), Pork production in China - A survey and analysis of the industry at a lewis turning point (pp. 37–61). Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., Lee, S.-H., & Matsumura, T. (2017). Ex-ante versus ex-post privatization policies with foreign penetration in free-entry mixed markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 50, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar