Ecological footprint, energy usage, and economic progress relationship: the MINT countries

References

• Abid, M. (2015). The close relationship between informal economic growth and carbon emissions in Tunisia since 1980: The (ir)relevance of structural breaks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A., Zhao, Y., Shahbaz, M., Bano, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2016). Carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy. Energy Policy, 96, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, R. R., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Environmental issues and strategic corporate social responsibility for organizational competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Z., Wang, Z., Mahmood, F., Hafeez, M., & Ali, N. (2019). Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(18), 18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpan, G. F., & Akpan, U. F. (2012). Electricity consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2 (4), 292–306.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., & Mohammed, A. H. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators, 48, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alola, A. A., Bekun, F. V., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. The Science of the Total Environment, 685, 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarado, R., Ortiz, C., Jiménez, N., Ochoa-Jiménez, D., & Tillaguango, B. (2021). Ecological footprint, air quality and research and development: The role of agriculture and international trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, J. B. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4772–4778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arouri, M. E. H., Ben Youssef, A., M'henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy, 45, 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aşıcı, A. A., & Acar, S. (2016). Does income growth relocate ecological footprint? Ecological Indicators, 61(2), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.022
   Google Scholar
• Asongu, S., Akpan, U. S., & Isihak, S. R. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment in fast-growing economies: Evidence from the BRICS and MINT countries. Financial Innovation, 4(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-018-0114-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., & Dalmazzone, S. (2008). A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J., & Ng, S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baloch, M. A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., & Iqbal, Z. (2019). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: Evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(6), 6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, L. (2006). Panel unit root tests: A review. Serie Rossa: Economia – Quaderno N. 43. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
   Google Scholar
• Begum, R. A., Sohag, K., Abdullah, S. M. S., & Jaafar, M. (2015). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekun, F. V., Emir, F., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. The Science of the Total Environment, 655, 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics (Vol. 15, pp. 161–178). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009). Taking the ‘U' out of Kuznets. A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charfeddine, L., & Mrabet, Z. (2017). The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: A panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. Y., Chen, S. T., Hsu, C. S., & Chen, C. C. (2016). Modeling the global relationships among economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(00)00048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destek, M. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. The Science of the Total Environment, 650(Pt 2), 2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destek, M. A., Ulucak, R., & Dogan, E. (2018). Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve for the EU countries: The role of ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(29), 29387–29396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2911-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2013). Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 57, 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M., Manera, M., & Lanza, A. (2009). On the robustness of robustness checks of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (4), 551–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9224-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, C., Zhu, S., An, N., Na, H., You, H., & Gao, C. (2021). Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 147, 111255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Footprint Network. (2020, January 6). Ecological Footprint (gha). http://data.footprintnetwork.org/
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper No. w3914, pp. 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, income, and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervieux, M. S., & Darné, O. (2015). Environmental Kuznets curve and ecological footprint: A time series analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(1), 814–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. H., & Yoo, S. H. (2014). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Quality & Quantity, 48 (1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9749-5
   Google Scholar
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardón, A., Kuik, O., & Tol, R. S. J. (2017). Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: An analysis of Latin America and the Caribbean. Atmósfera, 30(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.20937/ATM.2017.30.02.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59(6), 1551–1580. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi (Eds.), Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels (Vol. 15, pp. 179–222).Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, H., Dai, S., & Yu, H. (2021). Spatial effect of innovation efficiency on ecological footprint: City-level empirical evidence from China. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 22, 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kireyev, A. P. (2000). Comparative macroeconomic dynamics in the Arab world: A panel VAR approach. IMF Working Papers WP/00/54. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451847505.001
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). Relationship between Energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 3(2), 401–403.
   Google Scholar
• Krkošková, R. (2021). Causality between energy consumption and economic growth in the V4 countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(4), 900–920. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T. H., & Quah, E. (2018). Income level and the emissions, energy, and growth nexus: Evidence from Asia and the Pacific. International Economics, 156, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, I., & Zicchino, L. (2006). Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190– 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
   Google Scholar
• Moon, H. R., & Perron, B. (2004). Testing for a unit root in panel with dynamic factors. Journal of Econometrics, 122(1), 81–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obradović, S., & Lojanica, N. (2017). Energy use, CO2 emissions, and economic growth-causality on a sample of SEE countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220–3225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, I., Al-Mulali, U., & Saboori, B. (2016). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of tourism and ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(2), 1916–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5447-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pao, H. T., & Chen, C. C. (2019). Decoupling strategies: CO2 emissions, energy resources, and economic growth in the group of twenty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment), and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a Panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China). Energy, 36(1), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(s1), 653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
   Google Scholar
• Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: New results. Econometric Theory, 20(03), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. C. B., & Moon, H. R. (1999). Linear regression limit theory for nonstationary panel data. Econometrica, 67(5), 1057–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riti, J. S., Song, D., Shu, Y., & Kamah, M. (2017). Decoupling CO2 emission and economic growth in China: Is there consistency in estimation results in analyzing environmental Kuznets curve? Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1448–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rus, A. V., Rovinaru, M. D., Pirvu, M., Bako, E. D., & Rovinaru, F. I. (2020). Renewable energy generation and consumption across 2030-analysis and forecast of required growth in generation capacity. Transformations in Business & Economics, 19(2B), 746–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen, P. (1992). Estimation and testing of cointegrated systems by an autoregressive approximation. Econometric Theory, 8(01), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600010720
   Google Scholar
• Shahbaz, M., Hye, G. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, J., Tillaguango, B., Alvarado, R., Ochoa-Moreno, S., & Alvarado-Espejo, J. (2021). Environmental impact of the shadow economy, globalisation, trade and market size: Evidence using linear and non-linear methods. Sustainability, 13(12), 6539. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škare, M., Tomić, D., & Stjepanović, S. (2020). Energy consumption and green GDP in Europe: A panel cointegration analysis 2008–2016. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. V., Leybourne, S., Kim, T.-H., & Newbold, P. (2004). More powerful panel unit root tests with an application to the mean reversion in real exchange rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783–820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancho, N., Sriyakul, T., & Tang, C. (2020). Asymmetric impacts of macroeconomy on environment degradation in Thailand: A NARDL approach. Contemporary Economics, 14(4), 582–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillaguango, B., Alvarado, R., Dagar, V., Murshed, M., Pinzón, Y., & Méndez, P. (2021). Convergence of the ecological footprint in Latin America: The role of the productive structure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(42), 59771–59783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14745-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle, and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188(7), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M., & Silverstein, J. (2000). Big things first: Focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00161-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, M., & Yount, J. D. (1998). The ecological footprint: An indicator of progress toward regional sustainability. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51(1/2), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006094904277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Li, G., & Fang, C. (2018). Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2144–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolde-Rufael, Y., & Idowu, S. (2017). Income distribution and CO2 emission: A comparative analysis for China and India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakari, A., & Toplak, J. (2021). Investigation into the social behavioural effects on a country's ecological footprint: Evidence from Central Europe. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar