Single-valued neutrosophic TODIM method based on cumulative prospect theory for multi-attribute group decision making and its application to medical emergency management evaluation

References

• Agrebi, M., & Abed, M. (2021). Decision-making from multiple uncertain experts: Case of distribution center location selection. Soft Computing, 25(6), 4525–4544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05461-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuong, B. C. (2014). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30, 409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudabadi, R., Mousavi, S. M., & Mohagheghi, V. (2020). A new last aggregation method of multi-attributes group decision making based on concepts of TODIM, WASPAS and TOPSIS under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty. Knowledge and Information Systems, 62(4), 1371–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01390-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfeshan, Y., & Mousavi, S. M. (2020). A novel interval type-2 fuzzy decision model based on two new versions of relative preference relation-based MABAC and WASPAS methods (with an application in aircraft maintenance planning). Neural Computing and Applications, 32(8), 3367–3385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04184-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. P., Yan, F., & Wu, M. Q. (2021). GLDS method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-Tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(6), 11523–11538. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, L., Gomes, C. F., & Rangel, L. (2009). A comparative analysis with THOR and TODIM: Rental evaluation in Volta Redonda. Revista Tecnologia, 30, 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Hu, M. C., Duffy, V. G., Shao, H., & Ren, Z. G. (2021). Kansei evaluation for group of users: A data-driven approach using dominance-based rough sets. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, T., Wei, G., Wu, J., & Wei, C. (2021). QUALIFLEX method for evaluating human factors in construction project management with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(3), 4039–4050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. L. (2016). New distance measure of single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(10), 1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Lin, R., & Chen, X. (2021). An enhancement EDAS method based on prospect theory. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, P., Wang, J. Q., & Zhang, H. Y. (2018). Frank prioritized Bonferroni mean operator with single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in selecting third-party logistics providers. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(3), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2660-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, X. N., Yu, L. X., & Fu, J. P. (2020). Evaluating personal default risk in P2P lending platform: Based on dual hesitant pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach. Mathematics, 8(1), 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, X. W., Ji, Y., & Qu, S. J. (2021). Minimum cost strategic weight assignment for multiple attribute decision-making problem using robust optimization approach. Computational & Applied Mathematics, 40, 193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkowska, B. (2014). The Federal States of Germany—Analysis and measurement of development using taxonomic methods. Oeconomia Copernicana, 5(3), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2014.019
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, J., Cannbron-Mellott, M. J., Tencer, T., Will, O., Mackie, D. S., & Beusterien, K. (2021). Patient and neurologist preferences in the United States for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatments: Findings from a discrete choice experiment. Patient Preference and Adherence, 15, 1515–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, F., Wei, G., & Chen, X. (2021). Model-based evaluation for online shopping platform with probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic CODAS method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(9), 5339–5358. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y. Y., Tu, Y., Ju, Y. B., & Shen, W. J. (2019). A multi-granularity proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method and its application to emergency decision making. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 36, 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. W., Wang, H. B., & Xu, Z. H. (2020). TODIM-based multi-criteria decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(5), 3647–3671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09774-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D. H., Liu, Y. Y., & Wang, L. Z. (2019). Distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term sets based on linguistic scale function: An illustration of the TODIM and TOPSIS methods. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(11), 2807–2834. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, X. L., Liu, L. Z., Xiao, C., Cheng, P. F., & Fu, C. X. (2020). Restoration Methods Selection for Wood Components of Chinese Ancient Architectures Based on TODIM with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5049360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Zhang, S., Wu, J., & Wei, Y. (2021). COPRAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under picture fuzzy environment and their application to green supplier selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Z. M., Gao, Y., & Zhao, W. H. (2020). A TODIM-based approach for environmental impact assessment of pumped hydro energy storage plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248(3), 119265.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, & Garg, H. (2019). A novel divergence measure and its based TOPSIS method for multi criteria decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36, 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J. J., Tian, C., Zhang, Z. Q., Song, H. Y., & Wang, J. Q. (2019). Single-valued neutrosophic power shapley choquet average operators and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making. Mathematics, 7(11), 1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X. D., & Dai, J. G. (2018). Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function. Neural Computing and Applications, 29(10), 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2607-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, R., & Kucuk, A. (2014). On similarity and entropy of neutrosophic soft sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27, 2417–2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvachandran, G., Quek, S. G., Smarandache, F., & Broumi, S. (2018). An extended technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) with maximizing deviation method based on integrated weight measure for single-valued neutrosophic sets. Symmetry, 10(7), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10070236
   Google Scholar
• Smarandache, F. (2002). A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic. Multiple-Valued Logic, 8(3), 297–384.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, R. X., Hu, J. H., & Chen, X. H. (2019). Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision-making approaches based on prospect theory and their applications in physician selection. Soft Computing, 23(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2949-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehreem, Hussain, A., Lee, J. R., Khan, M. S. A., & Shin, D. Y. (2021). Analysis of social networks by using pythagorean cubic fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric aggregation operators. Journal of Mathematics, 2021, 5516869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5516869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X. L., Xu, Z. S., & Gu, J. (2019). An extended TODIM based on cumulative prospect theory and its application in venture capital. Informatica, 30(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2019.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, R. (2021). Fuzzy MABAC method based on new exponential fuzzy information measures. Soft Computing, 25(14), 9575–9589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05739-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., & Sunderraman, R. (2010). Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 2010, 410–413.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G., Wei, C., & Guo, Y. (2021). EDAS method for probabilistic linguistic multiple attribute group decision making and their application to green supplier selection. Soft Computing, 25(14), 9045–9053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05842-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, G., Wu, J., Guo, Y., Wang, J., & Wei, C. (2021). An extended COPRAS model for multiple attribute group decision making based on single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen-Ran, Z. (1994). Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA '94. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference. The Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intellige (pp. 305–309).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. B., Yuan, Y., Wei, L. J., & Pei, L. D. (2018). On entropy, similarity measure and cross-entropy of single-valued neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-attribute decision making. Soft Computing, 22(22), 7367–7376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C. B., Ke, Y. M., Li, Y. B., Chu, H., & Wu, Y. N. (2020). Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS. Energy Conversion and Management, 215, 112892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D. S., Hong, Y. R., & Xiang, K. L. (2019). A method of determining multi-attribute weights based on single-valued neutrosophic numbers and its application in TODIM. Symmetry-Basel, 11, 12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D. S., Wei, C., & Wei, G. W. (2017). TODIM method for single-valued neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making. Information, 8(4), 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8040125
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D. S., Wei, X. L., Ding, H., & Bin, H. Q. (2020). A new method based on PROMETHEE and TODIM for multi-attribute decision-making with single-valued neutrosophic sets. Mathematics, 8(10), 1816. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W. H., Shang, X. P., & Wang, J. (2021). Multiple attribute group decision-making based on cubic linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and power Hamy mean. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7(3), 1673–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00255-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. (2014). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J. (2014). Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multicriteria decision making problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(3), 1170–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, L. G., Marcelloni, F., Gerolamo, M. C., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2021). Exploring the relations between supply chain performance and organizational culture: A fuzzy grey group decision model. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 108023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.108023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Y., Wang, J. Q., & Chen, X. H. (2014). Interval neutrosophic sets and their application in multicriteria decision making problems. TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014, 645953. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/645953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, S., Gao, H., Wei, G., & Chen, X. (2021). Grey relational analysis method based on cumulative prospect theory for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(2), 3783–3795. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-211461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Li, L. Y., & Xu, Z. H. (2021). Study on hotel selection method based on integrating online ratings and reviews from multi-websites. Information Sciences, 572, 460–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Wei, G., Chen, X., & Wei, Y. (2021). Intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC method based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(11), 6337–6359. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Wei, G., Guo, Y., & Chen, X. (2021). CPT-TODIM method for interval-valued bipolar fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and application to industrial control security service provider selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, M., Wei, G., Wei, C., & Wu, J. (2021). Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM method based on the cumulative prospect theory for MAGDM and its application on risk assessment of science and technology projects. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23(4), 1027–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00986-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar