A double interaction-based financing group decision-making framework considering uncertain information and inconsistent assessment

References

• Alavipour, S. M. R., & Arditi, D. (2018). Impact of contractor’s optimized financing cost on project bid price. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, S. (2013). Temporal discounting and number representation. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.820188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashiri, M., & Badri, H. (2011). A group decision making procedure for fuzzy interactive linear assignment programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5561–5568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Z. (2014). Financing new metros—The Beijing metro financing sustainability study. Transport Policy, 32, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L. L., Li, M. J., & Jiang, J. (2013). A variable weight approach for evidential reasoning. Journal of Central South University, 20(8), 2202–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1725-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemmanur, T. J., & John, K. (1996). Optimal incorporation, structure of debt contracts, and limited-recourse project financing. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5(4), 372–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.1996.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Zhang, D. N. (2020). Evaluation of city sustainability using multi-criteria decision-making considering interaction among criteria in Liaoning province China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Gu, J., & Xu, Z. S. (2018). Venture capital group decision-making with interaction under probabilistic linguistic environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 140, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, K. S., Yang, J. B., Guo, M., & Lam, J. P. K. (2009). An evidential-reasoning-interval-based method for new product design assessment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(1), 142–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, X. J., Xu, Z. S., & Zhou, W. (2020). Interval consistency repairing method for double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation and application in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 34(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M. K. (2002). Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00040-5
   Google Scholar
• Han, X. L., & Li, S. R. (1994). The priority method in view of consistency harmonious weight index. Systems Engineering-Theory Methodology Applications, 3(1), 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1997). A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 88(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00047-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, G., Lee, C. M., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Information uncertainty and expected returns. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3), 185–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1528-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissinger, G., Gupta, A., Mulder, I., & Unterstell, N. (2019). Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives. Land Use Policy, 83, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, G., Xu, D. L., Yang, J. B., & Ma, X. (2015). Combined medical quality assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(13), 5522–5530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, O. (1997). Cash flow and investment: Evidence from internal capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 83–109.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. B., Gao, R., Zhou, C., & Ma, N. (2019). Two-period pricing and strategy choice for a supply chain with dual uncertain information under different profit risk levels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R. A., & Reformat, M. Z. (2017). Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction. Information Sciences, 408, 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, X. B., & Wu, M. (2019). Probabilistic linguistic multi-attribute group decision-making model based on interaction and feedback. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 33(3), 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reverberi, P., & Talamo, M. (1999). A probabilistic model for interactive decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 25(4), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahi, S. K., Arora, A. P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An exploratory inquiry into the psychological biases in financial investment behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.790387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, B. (2018). The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects. Energy Economics, 69(1), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Tang, X. A., Feng, N. P., Xue, M., Yang, S. L., & Wu, J. (2017). The expert reliability and evidential reasoning rule based intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(2), 1067–1082. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-162436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Z. F., Shao, Z. Y., Liu, J. P., Zhou, L. G., & Chen, H. Y. (2020). Basic uncertain information soft set and its application to multi-criteria group decision making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 95, 103871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. H., Yang, C. C., Leu, J. D., Lee, Y. F., & Yang, C. H. (2013). An integrated group decision making support model for corporate financing decisions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(6), 1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9308-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. L., Kai, L., Guan, G., Yu, Y. Y., & Liu, F. (2019). Evaluation method for Green jack-up drilling platform design scheme based on improved grey correlation analysis. Applied Ocean Research, 85, 119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. (2015). Uncertain multi-attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B. (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., & Singh, M. G. (1994). An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans, 24(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., & Xu, D. L. (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans, 32(3), 289–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, G., Yang, Y. S., Tian, G. D., & Zhuang, Q. W. (2020). Comprehensive evaluation of disassembly performance based on the ultimate cross-efficiency and extension-gray correlation degree. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. (2017). Entropy-based weights on decision makers in group decision-making setting with hybrid preference representations. Applied Soft Computing, 60, 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. Q. (2006). Public clients’ best value perspectives of public private partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(107)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. X., Xu, Z. S., Wang, H., & Liao, H. C. (2016). Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Applied Soft Computing, 49, 817–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar