1,553
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How to improve the government-enterprise relationships to retain enterprise?

ORCID Icon &
Pages 6345-6363 | Received 03 May 2021, Accepted 24 Feb 2022, Published online: 16 Mar 2022

References

  • Chen, W., Han, C., Wang, L., Ieromonachou, P., & Lu, X. (2021). Recognition of entrepreneur’s social ties and firm innovation in emerging markets: Explanation from the industrial institutional environment and survival pressure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 491–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09680-2
  • Chen, Z. H., & Liu, Z. X. (2019). Government-enterprise relationship and firm idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Management Science, 32(04), 48–61.
  • Dang, L., Yang, R. L., & Yang, J. D. (2015). Anti-corruption and firms' innovations: An explanation from political connections. China Industrial Economics, 33(7), 146–160.
  • Dong, Z. Q., Wei, X. H., & Zhang, Y. J. (2016). The allocation of entrepreneurial efforts in a rent-seeking society: Evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(2), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.004
  • Du, Y. Z., Li, J. X., Liu, Q. C., Zhao, S. T., & Chen, K. W. (2021). Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective: Research progress and future directions. Management World, 37(03), 180–197.
  • Du, Y. Z., Liu, Q. C., & Cheng, J. Q. (2020). What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity? A research based on institutional configurations. Management World, 36(09), 141–155.
  • Dul, J., van der Laan, E., & Kuik, R. (2020). A statistical significance test for necessary condition analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118795272
  • Egfjord, K. F. H., & Sund, K. J. (2020). Do you see what I see? How differing perceptions of the environment can hinder radical business model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119787
  • Fainshmidt, S., Witt, M. A., Aguilera, R. V., & Verbeke, A. (2020). The contributions of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(7), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00313-1
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better casual theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
  • Flaherty, E. (2019). Varieties of regulation and financialization: Comparative pathways to top income inequality in the OECD, 1975-2005. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2017.1416827
  • Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
  • Guo, H., Xu, E., & Jacobs, M. (2014). Managerial political ties and firm performance during institutional transitions: An analysis of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.11.009
  • He, X. G., Zhu, L. N., Lü, F. F., & Jia, Z. H. (2019). Why do entrepreneurs exit? An empirical study based on the institutional perspective. Nankai Business Review, 22(05), 101–116.
  • Hoogendoorn, B., Peter, V., & Thurik, R. (2019). Sustainable entrepreneurship: The role of perceived barriers and risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 1133–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3646-8
  • Judge, W. Q., Fainshmidt, S., & Brown, J. L. (2020). Institutional systems for equitable wealth creation: Replication and an update of Judge et al. (2014). Management and Organization Review, 16(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2020.1
  • Li, J. H., & Huang, J. H. (2017). Network embedness, innovation legitimacy and radical innovation resource acquisition. Science Research Management, 38(04), 10–18.
  • Li, L., Gao, H. L., Gu, C. X., & Xue, D. H. (2013). Research on industrial structure and performance of POEs from political connection perspective: Based on POEs’ data from 2005 to 2010. Nankai Business Review, 16(04), 94–105.
  • Lou, C. G., & Zhang, Gy. (2018). Research on the construction of business environment assessment framework based on the subjective perception of the market subject: A review of business environment assessment model of the World Bank. Contemporary Economic Management, 40(06), 60–68.
  • Luo, D. L., & Liu, X. L. (2009). Political relationships, barriers to entry and firm performance: Empirical evidence from private listed companies in China. Management World, 25(05), 97–106.
  • Luo, P. Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501.
  • Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195.
  • Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. The Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705.
  • Nie, H. H. (2020). From collusion to cooperation between government and business – A dynamic framework of government-business relation. Academic Monthly, 52(06), 44–56.
  • Nyström, K. (2007). Patterns and determinants of entry and exit in industrial sectors in Sweden. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 5(3-4), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-007-0017-z
  • Ren, T., Ru, J., & Yin, X. L. (2015). Firm ownership status, institutional environment, and the choice of cross-regional market entry strategies: The case of Chinese real estate industry. Nankai Business Review, 18(02), 51–63.
  • Shi, W. S., Markoczy, L., & Stan, C. V. (2014). The continuing importance of political ties in China. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0153
  • Wang, F. B., Jiang, H., & Wang, C. (2014). The evolution of the control framework China’s central SOEs: Is it strategy determined, institution driven, or dependence on the path? An attempt of a quality comparative analysis. Management World, 30(12), 92–114. +187–188.
  • Wei, J., Zhao, Q. Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). The new type of government-business relationship and corporate performance stability: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Journal of Industrial Engineering Management, 35(04), 1–13.
  • Xia, H. X., Tan, Q. M., & Bai, J. H. (2019). Business environment, enterprise rent-seeking and market innovation: Evidence from the China enterprise survey. Economic Research, 54(04), 84–98.
  • Xu, W. H., Ruan, Q. S., & Wang, G. D. (2021). External environmental risk perception of private entrepreneurs and innovation investment of enterprises. Science Research Management, 42(03), 160–171.
  • Yang, T. Y., & Zhang, L. (2009). Analysis on the factors influencing the entry and exit behavior of Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Management World, 25(06), 82–90.
  • Yu, W. C., & Liang, P. H. (2019). Uncertainty, business environment and private enterprises’ vitality. China Industrial Economics, 37(11), 136–154.
  • Yuan, J. G., Hou, Q. S., & Cheng, C. (2015). The imprecation effect of firm's political resource. Management World, 31(1), 139–155.
  • Zhang, M., & Du, Y. Z. (2019). Application of QCA methods in organizational and management studies: Positioning, strategies, and directions. Chinese Journal of Management, 16(09), 1312–1323.