Outlier identification and group satisfaction of rating experts: density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise based on multi-objective large-scale group decision-making evaluation

References

• Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadnia, A. H., Saman, M. Z. M., Wong, K. Y., Ghadimi, P., & Zakuan, N. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection based on self-organizing map neural network and multi criteria decision making approaches. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 879–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.214
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies/Projektų Vadyba Su Multimoora Kaip Priemonė Pereinamojo Laikotarpio Ūkiams. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., & Göçer, F. (2021). Evaluation of software development projects based on integrated Pythagorean fuzzy methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. (2021). White paper on China's digital economy development. http://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202104/t20210429_375940.html
   Google Scholar
• Choi, T.-M., & Chen, Y. (2021). Circular supply chain management with large scale group decision making in the big data era: The macro-micro model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, R.-X., Palomares, I., Wang, X., Yang, G.-R., Liu, B., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2020). Large-scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an artificial intelligence and applications perspective. Information Fusion, 59, 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. KDD'96: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 96(34), 226–231.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, C., Chang, W., & Yang, S. (2020). Multiple criteria group decision making based on group satisfaction. Information Sciences, 518, 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D. (1980). The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(80)90027-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H., & Zhang, R. (2021). The context-based distance measure for intuitionistic fuzzy set with application in marine energy transportation route decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 101, 107044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., Ezeh, C. I., Zhao, H., Deng, W., Hong, S.-H., & Tang, Y. (2021). A target-driven decision-making multi-layered approach for optimal building retrofits via agglomerative hierarchical clustering: A case study in China. Building and Environment, 197, 107849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Liu, H., Zhang, J., & Liu, A. (2021). KR-DBSCAN: A density-based clustering algorithm based on reverse nearest neighbor and influence space. Expert Systems with Applications, 186, 115763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Jiang, N., Chen, J., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Multi-criteria group decision-making method for green supplier selection based on distributed interval variables. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Wei, K.-K., & Tan, B. C. (1999). Compensating effects of GSS on group performance. Information & Management, 35(4), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00083-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazancoglu, Y., Sagnak, M., Mangla, S. K., Sezer, M. D., & Pala, M. O. (2021). A fuzzy based hybrid decision framework to circularity in dairy supply chains through big data solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R., & Ghazali, M. F. (2021). A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria. Symmetry, 13(6), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060973
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Cerrada, M., Cabrera, D., Sanchez, R. V., Pacheco, F., Ulutagay, G., & Valente de Oliveira, J. (2018). A comparison of fuzzy clustering algorithms for bearing fault diagnosis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34(6), 3565–3580. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2019). A consensus model for large-scale linguistic group decision making with a feedback recommendation based on clustered personalized individual semantics and opposing consensus groups. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2857720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Li, L., Xu, Z., & Tian, X. (2021). Large-scale consensus with endo-confidence under probabilistic linguistic circumstance and its application. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2022). Big data-driven fuzzy large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) in circular economy environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Chen, X. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Soft Computing, 30, 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zhang, Y., Cheng, H., Zhou, F., & Yin, B. (2021). An unsupervised ensemble clustering approach for the analysis of student behavioral patterns. IEEE Access, 9, 7076–7091. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B. S., Shen, Y. H., Chen, X. H., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. Q. (2014). A partial binary tree DEA-DA cyclic classification model for decision makers in complex multi-attribute large-group interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making problems. Information Fusion, 18, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-W., & Wang, G.-J. (2007). Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Xu, Y., Huang, J., Wei, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Social network clustering and consensus-based distrust behaviors management for large-scale group decision-making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Applied Soft Computing, 117, 108373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiraji, H. A., Zavadskas, E. K., Skare, M., Kafshgar, F. Z. R., & Arab, A. (2020). Evaluating strategies for implementing industry 4.0: A hybrid expert oriented approach of B.W.M. and interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy T.O.D.I.M. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1600–1620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1753090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., MD Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications—A review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. D., & Shin, W.-Y. (2019). An improved density-based approach to Spatio-textual clustering on social media. IEEE Access, 7, 27217–27230. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcalici, M., & Bumin, M. (2020). An integrated multi-criteria decision making model with self-organizing maps for the assessment of the performance of publicly traded banks in Borsa Istanbul. Applied Soft Computing, 90, 106166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, L., & Deng, Y. (2022). A novel similarity measure in intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 107, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchrompo, S., Wannakrairot, A., & Parlikad, A. K. (2021). Pruning Pareto optimal solutions for multi-objective portfolio asset management. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(1), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, R. M., Labella, Á., Sesma-Sara, M., Bustince, H., & Martínez, L. (2021). A cohesion-driven consensus reaching process for large scale group decision making under a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, 107158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 100, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M., Zhou, X., Liao, H., Xu, J., Fujita, H., & Herrera, F. (2019). Ordinal consensus measure with objective threshold for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 180, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2018). A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Information Fusion, 41, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Wu, J. (2010). Intuitionistic fuzzy C-means clustering algorithms. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 21(4), 580–590. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, Y., & Deng, Y. (2021). Decision making under measure-based granular uncertainty with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Applied Intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 51(8), 6224–6233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Chen, C., Streimikiene, D., & Balezentis, T. (2019). Intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage technologies. Applied Soft Computing, 79, 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2016). A hierarchical clustering approach based on three-dimensional gray relational analysis for clustering a large group of decision makers with double information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9444-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., Tang, X., & Elahi, A. (2021). Application of the novel harmony search optimization algorithm for DBSCAN clustering. Expert Systems with Applications, 178, 115054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar