Does compensative subsidy alleviate pollutant emission and improve welfare under cross-industry pollution?

References

• Addo, M. A., Darko, E. O., Gordon, C., & Nyarko, B. J. B. (2013). Contamination of soils and loss of productivity of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) caused by cement dust pollution. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment, 3(1), 272–282.
   Google Scholar
• Alfsen, K., Brcndcmoen, A., & Glomsrød, S. (1992). Benefits of climate policies: Some tentative calculations, Discussion paper 1992, no.69, Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, D., & Chiroleu-Assouline, M. (2019). Environmental tax reform and income distribution with imperfect heterogeneous labour markets. European Economic Review, 116, 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C. (2011). Production externality and productivity of labor. Review of Public Economics, 196(1), 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C., & Garzón, M. B. (2009). Environmental taxes and wage setting structure. Prague Economic Papers, 18(4), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (1994). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(Supplement_1), 878–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.878
   Google Scholar
• Benarroch, M., & Thille, H. (2001). Transboundary pollution and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 55(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00084-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blobel, D., Gerdes, H., Pollitt, H., Barton, J., Drosdowski, T., Lutz, C., Wolter, M. I., & Ekins, P. (2011). Implications of ETR in Europe for household distribution. In Ekins, P. & Speck, S. (Eds.), Environmental tax reform (ETR)—A policy for green growth, (pp. 236–290). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, C., Garcia-Muros, X., & González-Eguino, M. (2019). Greener and fairer: A progressive environmental tax reform for Spain, Oldenburg Discussion Papers in Economics, No. V-418-19. University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L. (1999). Green tax reforms and the double dividend: An updated reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 6(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008715920337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L., & de Mooij, R. A. (1994a). Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review, 84(4), 1085–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L., & de Mooij, R. A. (1994b). Environmental policy in a small open economy with distortionary labor taxes: A general equilibrium analysis. In van Ierland, E.C. (Ed.), International environmental economics. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L., & van der Ploeg, F. (1994a). Environmental policy, public finance and the labour market in a second-best world. Journal of Public Economics, 55(3), 349–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)01398-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, A. L., & van der Ploeg, F. (1994b). Consequences of environmental tax reform for involuntary unemployment and welfare, CentER Discussion Paper 9408. Tilburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Brendemoen, A., & Vennemo, H. (1994). A climate treaty and the Norwegian economy: A CGE assessment. The Energy Journal, 15(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol15-No1-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90037-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cato, S. (2010). Emission taxes and optimal refunding schemes with endogenous market structure. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9340-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., & Stanway, D. (2016). China sets cap for energy consumption for first time. Reuters. http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/02/24/china-will-far-surpass-2020-climate-target-says-top-envoy/.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. F., Tsai, C. S., Hsu, C. C., Lin, S. C., Tsai, T. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2019). Emission tax and compensation subsidy with cross-industry pollution. Sustainability, 11(4), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, B., & Taylor, S. (1999). Trade, spatial separation, and the environment. Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 137–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00020-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., & Sforna, G. (2020). A dynamic CGE model for jointly accounting ageing population, automation and environmental tax reform. European Union as a case study. Economic Modelling, 87, 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damania, D. (1996). Pollution taxes and pollution abatement in an oligopoly supergame. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, M., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2005). Environmental regulation and the eco-industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 28(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-3106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, C. (1988). Multiunit bargaining in oligopolistic industries. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1086/298189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewijk, C. v., & Wijnbergen, S. v (1995). Can abatement overcome the conflict between the environment and economic growth? De Economist, 143, 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández, E., Pérez, R., & Ruiz, J. (2011). Optimal green tax reforms yielding double dividend. Energy Policy, 39(7), 4253–4263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K. (2009). Environmental policies in a differentiated oligopoly revisited. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulder, L H. (1995a). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495
   Google Scholar
• Goulder, L. H. (1995b). Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: An intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Stern, N. (2015). China’s “new normal”: Structural change, better growth, and peak emissions. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/chinas-new-normal-structural-change-better-growth-and-peak-emissions/.
   Google Scholar
• Green, F., & Stern, N. (2017). China’s changing economy: Implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Climate Policy, 17(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1156515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Wong, T. W., Law, S. C., Dong, G. H., Ho, K. F., Yang, Y., & Yim, S. H. L. (2018). Impacts of sectoral emissions in China and the implications: Air quality, public health, crop production, and economic costs. Environmental Research Letters, 13(8), 084008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., & Yim, S. H. L. (2016). The air quality and health impacts of domestic trans-boundary pollution in various regions of China. Environment International, 97, 117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2014). Shift taxes from labour to environment, EEA tells ministers. https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/news/shift-taxes-from-labour-to-environment-eea-tells-ministers/.
   Google Scholar
• Hoel, M. (1997). Coordination of environmental policy for transboundary environmental problems. Journal of Public Economics, 66(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoel, M. (1998). Emission taxes versus other environmental policies. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 100(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, H., & Wolinsky, A. (1988). Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, X., Chan, C. K., Dong, G. H., & Yim, S. H. L. (2019). Impacts of transboundary air pollution and local emissions on PM2.5 pollution in the Pearl River Delta region of China and the public health, and the policy implications. Environmental Research Letters, 14(3), 034005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. C., Lee, J. Y., & Wang, L. F. (2017). Consumers awareness and environmental policy in differentiated mixed oligopoly. International Review of Economics & Finance, 51, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikefuji, M., Itaya, J. I., & Okamura, M. (2016). Optimal emission tax with endogenous location choice of duopolistic firms. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9914-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ino, H., & Matsumura, T. (2019). The equivalence of emission tax with tax-revenue refund and emission intensity regulation. Economics Letters, 182, 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B., & van der Ploeg, F. (2010). Precautionary climate change policies and optimal redistribution, OxCarre Research Paper, 49. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, K. (2011). Emission quota versus emission tax in a mixed duopoly. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 13(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0003-x
   Google Scholar
• Katsoulacos, Y., & Xepapadeas, A. (1995). Environmental policy under oligopoly with endogenous market structure. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E. (2016). China will “far surpass” 2020 climate target, says top envoy. http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/02/24/china-will-far-surpass-2020-climate-target-says-top-envoy/.
   Google Scholar
• Lahiri, S., & Ono, Y. (2007). Relative emission standard versus tax under oligopoly: The role of free entry. Journal of Economics, 91(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0243-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Mauzerall, D. L., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., Song, Y., Peng, W., Klimont, Z., Qiu, X., Zhang, S., Hu, M., Lin, W., Smith, K. R., & Zhu, T. (2016). Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source,. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7756–7761. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604537113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, I. M., & Solow, R. M. (1981). Wage bargaining and employment. American Economic Review, 71(5), 896–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. E. (2021). Carbon taxes in theory and practice. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 13(1), 245–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102519-113630
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, A., & Pennings, E. (2011). Unionization structure, licensing and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neidell, M. (2017). Air pollution and worker productivity. IZA World of Labor, 2017, 363. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.363
   Google Scholar
• Nickell, S. J., & Andrews, M. (1983). Unions real wages and employment in Britain 1951–1979. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(Supp), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041610
   Google Scholar
• Nie, P. Y., Wang, C., & Wen, H. X. (2022). Optimal tax selection under monopoly: Emission tax VS carbon tax. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(8), 12157–12163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1995). Green taxes: Can we protect the environment and improve the tax system at the same time? Southern Economic Journal, 61(4), 915–922. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchida, Y., & Goto, D. (2014). Do emission subsidies reduce emission? In the context of environmental R&D organization. Economic Modelling, 36, 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, R. (2012). Delegation and emission tax in a differentiated oligopoly. The Manchester School, 80(6), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, I. H. (1995). Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(3), s64–s77. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. (1924). The economics of welfare. (2nd ed.). Macmillan and Co., limited.
   Google Scholar
• Proost, S., & van Regemorter, D. (1995). The double dividend and the role of inequality aversion and macroeconomic regimes. International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877497
   Google Scholar
• Radulescu, M., Sinisi, C. I., Popescu, C., Iacob, S. E., & Popescu, L. (2017). Environmental tax policy in Romania in the context of the EU: Double dividend theory. Sustainability, 9(11), 1986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegelmilch, K., Jacqueline, C., Runkel, M., & Mahler, A. (2016). Environmental tax reform in developing, emerging and transition economies, Studies, 93. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).
   Google Scholar
• Schöb, R. (1994). Evaluating tax reforms in the presence of externalities. Paper presented at the 50th IIPF congress, Harvard, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. D. (1995). Optimal pollution taxation in a cournot duopoly. Environmental & Resource Economics, 6(4), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney, D. (2015). European climate leadership in question: Policies toward China and India. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulph, A. (1996). Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulph, D. (1992). A note on the "double dividend" of pollution taxes, Discussion Paper 92/317. University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Li, X. W., Wen, H. X., & Nie, P. Y. (2021). Order financing for promoting on green transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 125415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, H. X., Chen, Z. R., & Nie, P. Y. (2021). Environmental and economic performance of China’s ETS pilots: New evidence from an expanded synthetic control method. Energy Reports, 7, 2999–3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, H. X., Chen, Z., Yang, Q., Liu, J. Y., & Nie, P. Y. (2022). Driving forces and mitigating strategies of CO2 emissions in China: A decomposition analysis based on 38 industrial sub-sectors. Energy, 245, 123262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. C. III. (2002). Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2001.1237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., Cho, S., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Emission tax and optimal privatization in Cournot-Bertrand comparison. Economic Modelling, 55, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D. X., Jing, Y. Q., Wang, C., Nie, P. Y., & Sun, P. (2021). Analysis of renewable energy subsidy in China under uncertainty: Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard. Energy Strategy Reviews, 34, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, X. (2003). Corrective taxes under oligopoly with inter-firm externalities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026360104591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar