531
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Accounting of public preferences and valuation of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem services restoration: Evidence from Northwestern China

, , , , , & show all
Article: 2180055 | Received 19 Jan 2022, Accepted 07 Feb 2023, Published online: 09 Mar 2023

References

  • Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017
  • Ali, M. A. S., Khan, S. U., Khan, A., Khan, A. A., & Zhao, M. (2020). Ranking of ecosystem services on the basis of willingness to pay: Monetary assessment of a subset of ecosystem services in the Heihe River basin. Science of the Total Environment, 734, 139447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139447
  • Ali, M. A. S., Yi, L., Khan, S. U., Khan, A. A., Musa, M., & Yang, L. (2022). Quantifying the spatial preferences heterogeneity to upgrade the endemic ecological attributes for a cleaner environment: Evaluating the feasibility of benefit transfer among sub-basins of an inland river. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 79357–79374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21276-w
  • Aregay, F. A., Yao, L., & Zhao, M. (2016). Spatial preference heterogeneity for integrated river basin management: the case of the Shiyang River basin, China. Sustainability, 8(10), 970. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8100970
  • Assessment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island press.
  • Barreiro-Hurle, J., Espinosa-Goded, M., Martinez-Paz, J. M., & Perni, A. (2018). Choosing not to choose: A meta-analysis of status quo effects in environmental valuations using choice experiments. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 18(1), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2018.01.04
  • Bartczak, A., & Metelska-Szaniawska, K. (2015). Should we pay, and to whom, for biodiversity enhancement in private forests? An empirical study of attitudes towards payments for forest ecosystem services in Poland. Land Use Policy, 48, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.027
  • Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., & Pearce, D. W. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/economic-valuation-with-stated-preference-techniques-9781843768524.html
  • Bateman, I. J., Day, B. H., Georgiou, S., & Lake, I. (2006). The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003
  • Bennett, J., & Blamey, R. (2001). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Brouwer, R. (2008). The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(5), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560802207860
  • Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., Kerekes, S., Milton, S., Palarie, T., Szerényi, Z., Vadineanu, A., & Wagtendonk, A. (2016). Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering, 87, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.018
  • Carr, L., & Mendelsohn, R. (2003). Valuing coral reefs: a travel cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio, 32(5), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-32.5.353
  • Cerda, C., Ponce, A., & Zappi, M. (2013). Using choice experiments to understand public demand for the conservation of nature: a case study in a protected area of Chile. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.010
  • Chen, D., Jin, G., Zhang, Q., Arowolo, A. O., & Li, Y. (2016). Water ecological function zoning in Heihe River basin, Northwest China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 96, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2016.08.005
  • Czajkowski, M., Budziński, W., Campbell, D., Giergiczny, M., & Hanley, N. (2017). Spatial heterogeneity of willingness to pay for forest management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(3), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0044-0
  • Desa, U. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://stg-wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/11125/unepswiosm1inf7sdg.pdf?sequence=1
  • Dudgeon, D. (2014). Accept no substitute: biodiversity matters. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 24(4), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2485
  • Feoli, E., Vuerich, L. G., & Zerihun, W. (2002). Evaluation of environmental degradation in northern Ethiopia using GIS to integrate vegetation, geomorphological, erosion and socio-economic factors. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 91(1–3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00236-5
  • Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
  • Han, R., Feng, C.-C., Xu, N., & Guo, L. (2020). Spatial heterogeneous relationship between ecosystem services and human disturbances: A case study in Chuandong, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 721, 137818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137818
  • Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998). Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3/4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008287310583
  • Higgins, K., Hutchinson, G., & Longo, A. (2020). Willingness-to-pay for eco-labelled forest products in Northern Ireland: An experimental auction approach. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 87, 101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101572
  • Jadhav, A., Anderson, S., Dyer, M. J., & Sutton, P. C. (2017). Revisiting ecosystem services: Assessment and valuation as starting points for environmental politics. Sustainability, 9(10), 1755. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101755
  • Khan, A., Khan, S. U., Ali, M. A. S., Khan, A. A., & Zhao, M. (2022). Prioritizing stakeholders’ preferences for policy scenarios of vulnerable ecosystems with spatial heterogeneity in choice experiment: Coupling stated preferences with elevation. Journal of Environmental Management, 310, 114757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114757
  • Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, S. U., Yao, L., Ullah, A., & Xu, T. (2018). Spatial heterogeneity of preferences for improvements in river basin ecosystem services and its validity for benefit transfer. Ecological Indicators, 93, 627–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.018
  • Khan, S. U., Guo, X., Hu, J., Khan, A. A., Talpur, M. A., Liu, G., & Zhao, M. (2022). Who cares and how much? Narrative for advances in aquatic ecosystem services through non-market valuation with spatial dimensions using a discrete choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130603
  • Khan, S. U., Hayat, S., Xia, X., Liu, G., & Zhao, M. (2020). Improvisation of indigenous environmental benefit transfer and valuation for cleaner environment: Choice experiment across northwest China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 123176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123176
  • Khan, S. U., Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, A. A., & Ali, M. A. S. (2019). Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: a benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin. The Science of the Total Environment, 679, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.049
  • Khan, S. U., Liu, G., Zhao, M., Chien, H., Lu, Q., Khan, A. A., Ali, M. A. S., & Misbahullah. (2020). Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin’s impression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(3), 3100–3112., https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06538-4
  • Konishi, Y., & Coggins, J. S. (2008). Environmental risk and welfare valuation under imperfect information. Resource and Energy Economics, 30(2), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.05.002
  • Kosenius, A.-K., & Markku, O. (2015). Ecosystem benefits from coastal habitats—A three-country choice experiment. Marine Policy, 58, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.032
  • Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
  • Li, F., Zhu, G., & Guo, C. (2013). Shiyang River ecosystem problems and countermeasures. Agricultural Sciences, 4(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.42012
  • Li, J., Ren, L., & Sun, M. (2020). Is there a spatial heterogeneous effect of willingness to pay for ecological consumption? An environmental cognitive perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118259
  • Li, Z., Deng, X., Wu, F., & Hasan, S. S. (2015). Scenario analysis for water resources in response to land use change in the middle and upper reaches of the Heihe River Basin. Sustainability, 7(3), 3086–3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033086
  • Liu, Y., & Huang, Y. (2017). An analysis on spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem service function in agricultural mechanization. Journal of Agricultural Mech Res, 9, 259–263.
  • Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K., & Covich, A. (2000). Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics, 33(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
  • Louviere, J. J. (2001). Choice experiments: an overview of concepts and issues. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, 13(3.3).
  • Mauerhofer, V., Ichinose, T., Blackwell, B. D., Willig, M. R., Flint, C. G., Krause, M., & Penker, M. (2018). Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity. Land Use Policy, 72, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.003
  • Mazur, K., & Bennett, J. W. (2008). Choice modelling in the development of natural resource management strategies in NSW. No. 448-2016-33934. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.94716
  • Nicosia, K., Daaram, S., Edelman, B., Gedrich, L., He, E., McNeilly, S., Shenoy, V., Velagapudi, A., Wu, W., Zhang, L., Barvalia, A., Bokka, V., Chan, B., Chiu, J., Dhulipalla, S., Hernandez, V., Jeon, J., Kanukollu, P., Kravets, P., … Gray, S. (2014). Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation. Ecological Economics, 104, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.010
  • Perni, Á., & Martínez-Paz, J. M. (2017). Measuring conflicts in the management of anthropized ecosystems: Evidence from a choice experiment in a human-created Mediterranean wetland. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(Pt 1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.049
  • Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
  • Qi, S., & Luo, F. (2007). Environmental degradation problems in the Heihe River Basin, northwest China. Water and Environment Journal, 21(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2006.00059.x
  • Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., Smol, J. P., Taylor, W. W., Tockner, K., Vermaire, J. C., Dudgeon, D., & Cooke, S. J. (2019). Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 94(3), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480
  • Ren, Y., Lu, L., Zhang, H., Chen, H., & Zhu, D. (2020). Residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services and its influencing factors: A study of the Xin’an river basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122301
  • Rolfe, J., Bennett, J., & Louviere, J. (2000). Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecological Economics, 35(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9
  • Ruud, P. (1996). Approximation and simulation of the multinomial probit model: an analysis of covariance matrix estimation (pp. 1–17). Department of Economics, Berkeley.
  • Sælen, H., & Ericson, T. (2013). The recreational value of different winter conditions in Oslo forests: A choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management, 131, 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.006
  • Shu, J., Wang, J., Zheng, B., Gao, J., & Zhang, L. (1998). Eco-environmental degeneration and improving proposal in the Heihe River Basin. Research of Environmental Sciences, 11, 55–61.
  • Singh, A. (2015). Poor quality water utilization for agricultural production: An environmental perspective. Land Use Policy, 43, 259–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.015
  • Song, W., & Deng, X. (2015). Effects of urbanization-induced cultivated land loss on ecosystem services in the North China Plain. Energies, 8(6), 5678–5693. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8065678
  • Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press. https://books.google.com.hk/books?id=4yHaAgAAQBAJ
  • Upton, V., Dhubháin, Á. N., & Bullock, C. (2012). Preferences and values for afforestation: The effects of location and respondent understanding on forest attributes in a labelled choice experiment. Forest Policy and Economics, 23, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.006
  • Wu, F., Zhan, J., Chen, J., He, C., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Water yield variation due to forestry change in the head-water area of Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Advances in Meteorology, 2015, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/786764
  • Wu, F., Zhan, J., Zhang, Q., Sun, Z., & Wang, Z. (2014). Evaluating impacts of industrial transformation on water consumption in the Heihe river basin of Northwest China. Sustainability, 6(11), 8283–8296. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6118283
  • Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, G., & Chen, Y. (2018). On the spatial relationship between ecosystem services and urbanization: A case study in Wuhan, China. Science of the Total Environment, 637–638, 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.396
  • Zhou, Z., Huang, Y., Zhao, L., & Jia, A. (2015). An analysis of the spatial heterogeneity of the functioning of ecosystem services related to land-and-water resources. Nature Environment & Pollution Technology, 14(2), 291–298.