Recreational use of urban forest parks: a case study in Fuzhou National Forest Park, China

References

• Aikoh T, Abe R, Kohsaka R, Iwata M, Shoji Y. 2012. Factors influencing visitors to suburban open space areas near a northern Japanese city. Forests. 3(4):155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Bell S., Blom D., Rautamäki M., Castel-Branco C.Simson A.,& Olsen, I. A. (2005). Design of urban forests. In Urban forests and trees (pp. 149–186). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Qi X. 2018. Protest response and contingent valuation of an urban forest park in Fuzhou City, China. Urban For Urban Green. 29:68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunnett N., Swanwick C.Woolley H. (2002). Improving urbanparks, play areas and green spaces. London: Department fortransport, local government and the regions.
   Google Scholar
• Escobedo F, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut. 159:2078–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzhou Statistics Bureau. 2016. Main data report of Fuzhou census through 1% population sampling survey. Chinese. [accessed 2017 Jan 21]. http://tjj.fuzhou.gov.cn/tjjzwgk/tjxx/ndbg/201605/t20160526_1077076.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Garrod GD, Willis KG. 1999. Economic valuation of the environment: methods and case studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 384p.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter IR. 2001. What do people want from urban forestry? – the European experience. Urban Ecosyst. 5:277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006a. Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan. 75:81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2006b. Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ Manage. 38(3):338–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D. 2015. Human-environment interactions in urban green spaces – a systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. 2008. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health. 98:1451–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijnendijk CC. 2003. A decade of urban forestry in Europe. For Policy Econ. 5:173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konijnendijk CC, Annerstedt M, Busse Nielsen A, Maruthaveeran S. 2013. Benefits of urban parks, a systematic review. Copenhagen: International Federation of Parks and Recreation Administration (IFPRA).
   Google Scholar
• Konijnendijk CC, Ricard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB. 2006. Defining urban forestry – a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Green. 4(3–4):93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Koo J-C, Park MS, Youn Y-C. 2013. Preferences of urban dwellers on urban forest recreational services in South Korea. Urban For Urban Green. 12:200–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Huang H, Yeh H. 2010. Developing an evaluation model for destination attractiveness: sustainable forest recreation tourism in Taiwan. J Sustain Tour. 18(6):811–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y. 2004. An explore to the development and management of tourism products in Fuzhou Forest Park. Cent South For Invent Plann. 23(3):30–32. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Lo A, Jim CY. 2010. Willingness of residents to pay and motives for conservation of urban green spaces in the compact city of Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Green. 9(2):113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Green. 11:351–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2012. Cities and biodiversity outlook. Montreal; 64p.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen L, Mäkinen K, Schipperijn J. 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 79:5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley H. 2006. Freedom of the city: contemporary issues and policy influences on children and young people’s use of public open space in England. Children Geograph. 4(1):45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chen B, Sun Z, Bao Z. 2013. Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban For Urban Green. 12:44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar