Relationship between the composition and distribution of nutritional substances, secondary metabolites, and internal secretory structures in the bark tissues of Larix gmelinii var. japonica, L. kaempferi, and their F₁ hybrid and susceptibility to vole herbivory

References

• Baradat P, Marpeau A, Walter J. 1991. Terpene markers. In: Muller-Starck G, Ziehe M, editors. Genetic variation in European populations of forest trees. Frankfurt: Sauerländer; p. 40–66.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter R, Hansson L. 2001. Bark consumption by small rodents in the northern and southern hemisphere. Mamm Rev. 31:47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant JP, Raffa KF. 1995. Chemical antiherbivore defense. In: Gartner BL, editor. Plant stems: physiology and functional morphology. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 365–381.
   Google Scholar
• Bucyanayandi JD, Bergeron JM, Menard H. 1990. Preference of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) for conifer seedlings: chemical components and nutritional quality of bark of damaged and undamaged trees. J Chem Ecol. 16:2569–2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evert RF. 2006. Esau’s plant anatomy: meristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body; their structure, function, and development. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fahn A. 2002. Functions and location of secretory tissues in plants and their possible evolutionary trends. Isr J Plant Sci. 50(suppl I):S59–S64.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrenberg S, Kane JM, Mitton JB. 2014. Resin duct characteristics associated with tree resistance to bark beetles across lodgepole and limber pines. Oecologia. 174:1283–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling E. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 167:353–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto T, Akutsu H, Nei M, Kita K, Kuromaru M, Oda K. 2006. Genetic variation in wood stiffness and strength properties of hybrid larch (Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi). J For Res. 11:343–349.
   Google Scholar
• Gallis AT, Panetsos KP. 1997. Use of cortical terpenes to discriminate Pinus brutia (Ten.), Pinus halepensis (Mill.), and their hybrids. Silvae Genet. 46:82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershenzon J. 1994. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J Chem Ecol. 20:1281–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RMA. 1992a. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 2small mammals. Forestry 65:281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill RMA. 1992b. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65:363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga R. 1953. Experimental studies on the taste of the vole for various kinds of the larch: on the vole-proof nature in the hybrid of larch. Mem Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ. 1:483–489 ( in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Hallgren P, Ikonen A, Hjältén J, Roininen H. 2003. Inheritance patterns of phenolics in F1, F2, and back-cross hybrids of willows: implications for herbivore responses to hybrid plants. J Chem Ecol. 29:1143–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanover JW. 1992. Applications of terpene analysis in forest genetics. New For. 6:159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson L, Gref R, Lundren L, Theander O. 1986. Susceptibility to vole attacks due to bark phenols and terpens in Pinus contorta provenances introduced into Sweden. J Chem Ecol. 12:1569–1578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson L, Gref R. 1987. Bark chemistry of Pinus contorta and P. sylvestris in relation to vole damage. Scand J For Res. 2:359–363.
   Google Scholar
• Harborne JB. 1991. Flavonoid pigments. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR, editors. Herbivores: their interaction with secondary metabolites, I: the chemical participants, 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 389–429.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi E, Iizuka K, Sukeno S, Kohno K. 1998. Relationship between resistance to vole browsing and content of ether extract in bark of larch species and hybrids. J For Res. 3:119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Heiska S, Tikkanen OP, Rousi M, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2007. Bark salicylates and condensed tannins reduce vole browsing amongst cultivated dark-leaved willows (Salix myrsinifolia). Chemoecol. 17:245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjältén J, Palo RT. 1992. Selection of deciduous trees by free ranging voles and hares in relation to plant chemistry. Oikos. 63:477–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokkaido Government. 1927. Studies on vole damages and their pest control. Rep For Exp. 11:123–217 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Holm Y, Hiltunen R. 1997. Variation and inheritance of monoterpenes in Larix species. Flavour Fragr J. 12:335–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inukai T, Haga R. 1953. Experimental studies on the taste of the vole for various kinds of the larch. Mem Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ. 1:281–300 ( in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara K, Matsukawa A 1940. Forest tree breeding and improvement, II: traits of F1 hybrids of conifer trees. Proc S15 Annu Mtg Jpn For Soc. Tokyo. p. 126–131 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Keeling CI, Bohlmann J. 2006. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol. 170:657–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey RG, Forsman ED, Swingle JK. 2009. Terpenoid resin distribution in conifer needles with implications for red tree vole, Arborimus longicaudus, foraging. Can Field-Nat. 123:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita K, Fujimoto T, Uchiyama K, Kuromaru M, Akutsu H. 2009. Estimated amount of carbon accumulation of hybrid larch in three 31-year-old progeny test plantations. J Wood Sci. 55:425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogell J, Holmbom B, Pranovich A, Hemming J, Willför S. 2012. Extraction and chemical characterization of Norway spruce inner and outer bark. Nord Pulp Paper Res J. 27:6–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučera LJ, Bergamin L. 2003. The structure, function, and physical properties of bark. In: Vaucher E, Eckenwalder JE, editors. Tree bark: a color guide. Portland (OR): Timber Press; p. 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Langenheim JH. 2003. Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Portland (OR): Timber Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miyabe K, Kudo Y. 1923. Icones of the essential forest trees of Hokkaido (Vol. I). Sapporo: Hokkaido Govt ( in Japanese and English).
   Google Scholar
• Nakata K, Kitagawa Y, Kondo K. 1991. Susceptibility of injury- experienced trees to vole attacks and shape of gnawing traces in old larch (Larix kaempferi) stands. Trans Mtg Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc. 39:56–58 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Nakata K, Saitoh T, Iwasa MA. 2015. Myodes rufocanus (Sundevall, 1846). In: Ohdachi SD, Ishibashi Y, Iwasa MA, Fukui D, Saitoh T, editors. The wild mammals of Japan. 2nd ed. Kyoto: Soukadoh. p. 150–153.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata K, Iwasa MA. 2015. Myodes rex (Imaizumi, 1971). In: Ohdachi SD, Ishibashi Y, Iwasa MA, Fukui D, Saitoh T, editors. The wild mammals of Japan. 2nd ed. Kyoto: Soukadoh; p. 154–155.
   Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi C, Arisawa H, Iizuka T. 1977. Studies on the resistance of forest trees to the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae, IV: chemical substances taking part in the resistance of Sakhalin larch, Larix gmelinii to biting by the vole. J Jpn For Soc. 59:167–172 (in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Orihashi K, Kojima Y, Terazawa M. 2005. Seasonal change of bark chemical composition of larches and vole preference. Res Bull Hokkaido Univ For. Vol. 62:1–14 ( in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Pallardy SG. 2007. Physiology of woody plants. 3rd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousi M. 1989. Susceptibility of winter-dormant Pinus sylvestris families to vole damage. Scand J For Res. 4:149–169.
   Google Scholar
• Roy J, Bergeron JM. 1990. Role of phenolics of coniferous trees as deterrents against debarking behavior of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). J Chem Ecol. 16:801–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato M, Seki K, Kita K, Moriguchi Y, Hashimoto M, Yunoki K, Kofujita H, Onishi M. 2009. Comparative analysis of diterpene composition in the bark of the hybrid larch F1, Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi and their parent trees. J Wood Sci. 55:32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seki K, Orihashi K, Sato M, Kishino M, Saito N. 2012. Accumulation of constitutive diterpenoids in the rhytidome and secondary phloem of the branch bark of Larix gmelinii var. japonica. J Wood Sci. 58:437–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms EL. 1992. Costs of plant resistance to herbivory. In: Frinz RS, Simms EL, editors. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. Chicago (IL): Univ Chicago Press; p. 392–425.
   Google Scholar
• Sudachkova NE, Milyutina IL, Romanova LI, Semenova GP. 2004. The annual dynamics of reserve compounds and hydrolitic enzymes activity in the tissues of Pinus sylvestris L. and Larix sibirica Ledeb.: the metabolism of reserve compounds in the tissues of Siberian conifers. Eurasian J For Res. 7:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sukeno S, Ozawa S 1997. Identification of compounds found in the larch associated with resistance to vole, and its application for early test, III: identification of compounds associated with vole resistance. Abst 108th Annu Mtg Jpn For Soc. Sapporo. p. 198 ( in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Syrach-Larsen C. 1956. Genetics in silviculture. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi M. 1960. General remarks on larch forestry. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Japan Forestry Technology Association (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi N, Shibata S. 1961. Forest tree improvement of larch species, III: frequency of the hybrid larch F1 (Larix gmelinii var. japonica×L. kaempferi) seedling produced by open pollination in Larix gmelinii var. japonica stands. Trans Mtg Hokkaido Br Jpn For Soc. 10:13–15 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi N, Nishiguchi C. 1966. Studies on the resistance of forest trees to the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae Thomas, II: relative feeding preference of the vole for seedlings of F1 hybrids of larch under laboratory conditions. Bull Tokyo Univ For. 62:173–188 ( in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi N, Nishiguchi C, Iizuka N. 1966. Tree breeding for resistance to vole in the genus Larix. Forest Tree Breeding. 36:2–5 (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Trockenbrodt M. 1990. Survey and discussion of the terminology used in bark anatomy. IAWA Bull Ns. 11:141–166.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward S. 1992. Responses of gymnosperm bark tissues to fungal infections. In: Blanchette RA, Biggs AR, editors. Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi. Berlin: Springer; p. 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa S, Kawanishi T. 1955. On the rinds of four species of the Larix genus. Bull Gov For Exp Stn. 79:125–142 ( in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar