Soil conservation service curve number determination for forest cover using rainfall and runoff data in experimental forests

References

• Adcock CJ. 1997. Sample size determination: A review. J Royal Stat Soc D. 46(2):261–283. doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00082.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken AP. 1973. Assessing systematic errors in rainfall-runoff models. J Hydrol. 20(2):121–136. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(73)90035-8.
   Google Scholar
• Blume T, Zehe E, Bronstert A. 2007. Rainfall—runoff response, event-based runoff coefficients and hydrograph separation. Hydrol Sci J. 52(5):843–862. doi:10.1623/hysj.52.5.843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta JV. 1997. Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions. J Irrigat Drain Eng. 123(1):28–35. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:1(28).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone M, Turco M, Brunetti G, Piro P. 2015. A cumulative rainfall function for subhourly design storm in Mediterranean urban areas. Adv Meteorol. 2015:1–10. doi:10.1155/2015/528564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chunkao K, Makarabhirom P, Boonyawat S. 1979. Summer flow of hill evergreen forest at Doi Pui, Chiangmai province (in Thai). Bangkok (Thailand): Department of Conservation, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. Kog-Ma Watershed Research Bulletin 34. Thai.
   Google Scholar
• Diebold FX, Mariano RS. 1995. Comparing predictive accuracy. J Bus Econ Stat. 13:253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyasi-Agyeiand Y, Melching CS. 2012. Modelling the dependence and internal structure of storm events for continuous rainfall simulation. J Hydrol. 464-465:249–261. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser VL, Jones OR. 1991. Runoff curve numbers for the southern high plains. Transact ASAE. 34(1):142–148. doi:10.13031/2013.31636.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins RH. 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. J Irrigat Drain Eng. 119(2):334–345. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins RH, Hjelmfelt AT, Zevenbergen AW. 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth, and curve numbers. J Irrigat Drain Eng. 111(4):330–340. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt AT. 1980. Empirical investigation of curve number technique. J Hydraul D-ASCE. 106(9):1471–1477.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt AT. 1991. Investigation of curve number procedure. J Hydraul Eng. 117(6):725–737. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:6(725).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im S, Park S, Jang T. 2007. Application of SCS curve number method for irrigated paddy field. KSCE J Civil Eng. 11(1):51–56. doi:10.1007/BF02823372.
   Google Scholar
• Kamata N, Kuraji K, Owari T, Guan BT. 2019. Developing a network of long-term research field stations to monitor environmental changes and ecosystem responses in Asian forests. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo Forests Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JLH, Wallace JS. 1958. Hydrology for engineers. New York (NY): McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra SK, Jain MK, Bhunya PK, Singh VP. 2005. Field application of the SCS-CN-based Mishra-Singh general model and its variants. Water Res Manage. 19:37–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-1076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery RJ. 1983. Advances in irrigation and drainage: A databased evaluation of the curve number method. New York (NY): ASCE; p. 290–297.
   Google Scholar
• Mulungu DMM, Ichikawa Y, Shiiba M. 2005. A physically based distributed subsurface-surface flow dynamics model for forested mountainous catchments. Hydrol Proc. 19:3999–4022. doi:10.1002/hyp.5868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NRCS] National Resources Conservation Service. 2001. National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. Washington (DC):US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Patil JP, Sarangi A, Singh AK, Ahmad T. 2008. Evaluation of modified CN methods for watershed runoff estimation using a GIS-based interface. Biosyst Eng. 100(1):137–146. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce VM, Hawkins RH. 1996. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hyd Eng. 1(1):11–19. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallison RE, Cronshey RC. 1979. Discussion of Hawkins. J Irrig Drain D-ASCE. 105(IR4):439–441.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter JB, Gardner TW. 1991. Runoff curve numbers for reclaimed surface mines in Pennsylvania. J Irrigat Drain Eng. 117(5):657–666. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1991)117:5(656).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safeeq M, Mauger GS, Grant GE, Arismendi I, Hamlet AF, Lee S-Y. 2014. Comparing large-scale hydrological model predictions with observed streamflow in the Pacific Northwest: effects of climate and groundwater. J Hydrometeorol. 15(6):2501–2521. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0198.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira L, Charbonnier F, Genta JL. 2000. The antecedent soil moisture condition of the curve number procedure. Hydrol Sci J. 45(1):3–12. doi:10.1080/02626660009492302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simanton JR, Hawkins RH, Mohseni-Saravi M, Renard KG. 1996. Runoff curve number variation with drainage area, Walnut Gulch, Arizona. T ASAE. 39:1391–1394. doi:10.13031/2013.27630.
   Google Scholar
• Singh VP. 1995. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Highlands Ranch (CO): Water Resources Publication.
   Google Scholar
• [SCS] Soil Conservation Service. 1972. National engineering handbook, section 4: hydrology. Washington (DC):US Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Springer EP, Coltharp GB, Hawkins RH, McGurk BJ 1980. Curve numbers from watershed data. Proceedings of the Symposium on Watershed Management; 1980 Jul 21-23; Boise, ID. New York (NY): ASCE. p. 938–950.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka N, Tantasirin C, Kuraji K, Suzuki M, Tangtham N. 2005. Inter-annual variation in rainfall interception at a hill evergreen forest in northern Thailand. B Tokyo U For. 113:11–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tancreto AE 2015. Comparison of hydrologic model performance statistics using Thiessen polygon rain gauge and NEXRAD precipitation input methods at different watershed spatial scales and rainfall return frequencies [master’s thesis]. Jacksonville(FL): University of North Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Tedela NH, McCutcheon SC, Rasmussen TC, Hawkins RH, Swank WT, Campbell JL, Adams MB, Jackson CR, Tollner EW. 2012. Runoff curve numbers for 10 small forested watersheds in the mountains of the eastern United States. J of Hydrol Eng. 17(11):1188–1198. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo KH, Yoon KS, Soileau JM. 1993. Runoff curve numbers determined by three methods under conventional and conservation tillages. Transact ASAE. 36(1):57–64. doi:10.13031/2013.28314.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan P-T. 1933. On the logarithmic frequency distribution and the semi-logarithmic correlation surface. Annals Math Stat. 4(1):30–74. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732821.
   Google Scholar