References
- Agbenyega O, Burgess PJ, Cook M, Morris J. 2009. Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy. 26(3):551–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011.
- Agnoletti M, Santoro A. 2015. Cultural values and sustainable forest management: the case of Europe. J For Res. 20(5):438–444.
- Assessment ME. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: synthesis. Washington (D.C.): Island Press; p. 137.
- Brown G, Reed P. 2000. Validating for a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. For Sci. 46:240–247.
- Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M. 2013. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. J Environ Manage. 129:33–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059.
- Castro AJ, Vaughn CC, Julian JP, García-Llorente M. 2016. Social demand for ecosystem services and implications for watershed management. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 52(1):209–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12379.
- Chan KM, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
- Chen LC, Lin JC, Wu CS, Huang GM, Chen YH. 2012. The current status of the wood product demand in Taiwan. QJ For Res. 34(4):287–296.
- Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Wilhelm-Rechman A. 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(28):9483–9488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706559105.
- De Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Hussain S. 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):50–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
- De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 7(3):260–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
- Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68(3):643–653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
- Hartter J. 2010. Resource use and ecosystem services in a forest park landscape. Soc Nat Resour. 23(3):207–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903360372.
- Huang YH 2015. A new perspective on Taiwan’s forestry policy. SciTech Reports: 201503399. Chinese.http://scitechreports.blogspot.com/2015/03/blogpost_24.html#more
- Igu NI, Marchant R. 2017. Freshwater swamp forest use in the Niger Delta: perception and insights. J For Res. 22(1):44–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2017.1280887.
- Jen IA, Lin JC, Tu A, Wu WY, Lai CS. 2000. Study on forest value changes in Taiwan: comparison between the general public and forestry professionals. Q J Chin For. 33(2):245–253. Chinese.
- Li CL, Li CH. 2012. Economic assessments of ecosystem service impacts of agricultural land-use change. Taiwanese Agril Econ Rev. 17(2):111–144. Chinese.
- Lin JC 2018. Taiwan forest ecosystem service value assessment. forestry Bureau of the agricultural committee of the executive Yuan. Research projects series tfbc-1070206. Chinese.
- Lin JC, Wang PJ, Chen LC, Lin YJ. 2008. An analysis of forest ecosystem services cognition by people with different environmental attitudes. Taiwan J For Sci. 23: S51–62. Chinese.
- López-Santiago CA, Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Plieninger T, Martín EG, González J A. 2014. Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain. Ecol Soc. 19(2):2. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06401-190227.
- Marta C, Maurizio C, Giacomo C, Marco B, Alessandro P. 2020. A social assessment of forest resource based on stakeholder’s perception: an application in three Balkans rural areas. J For Res. 25(5):308–314. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2020.1782554.
- Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, González JA. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One. 7(6):e38970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
- Paletto A, Giacovelli G, Grilli G, Balest J, De Meo I. 2014. Stakeholders’ preferences and the assessment of forest ecosystem services: a comparative analysis in Italy. J For Sci. 60(11):472–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.17221/85/2014-JFS.
- Peterson MJ, Hall DM, Am FELDPAUSCH‐PARKER, Tr P. 2010. Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conserv Biol. 24(1):113–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01305.x.
- Quintas-Soriano C, Brandt JS, Running K, Baxter CV, Gibson DM, Narducci J, Castro AJ. 2018. Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception. Ecol Soc. 23(3):3. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10226-230303.
- Rolston H, Coufal J. 1991. A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. J For. 89(4):35–40.
- Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr. 31(2):748–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.002.
- Thompson ID. 2015. An overview of the science–policy interface among climate change, biodiversity, and terrestrial land use for production landscapes. J For. Res.20(5):423–429.
- Van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sutton SG, Barnes M, Sherrouse BC. 2012. Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park. Australia Appl Geogr. 35(1–2):164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008.
- Wang PJ, Lin JC, Chen YH, Wu MS. 2017. A study on private forest landowners’ perception of forest risks and adaptive forest management strategies to climate change. Q J Chin For. 50(3):235–250. Chinese.
- Wang PJ, Zheng CL. 2002. An analysis of the public’s perception and valuing on different forest management practices in Taiwan. JExp for Natl Taiwan Univ. 16(2):135–144. Chinese.