Integrating personal laser scanning with uncrewed aerial vehicle-based photogrammetry or laser scanning for accurate stem volume estimation in temperate coniferous forests

References

• Aicardi I, Dabove P, Lingua A, Piras M. 2016. Integration between TLS and UAV photogrammetry techniques for forestry applications. IForest - Biogeosci For. 10(1):41. doi: 10.3832/ifor1780-009.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet S, Lisein J, Lejeune P. 2017. Comparison of UAS photogrammetric products for tree detection and characterization of coniferous stands. Int J Remote Sens. 38(19):5310–5337. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2017.1338839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarretta N, Harrison PA, Bailey T, Potts B, Lucieer A, Davidson N, Hunt M. 2020. Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches. New Forest. 51(4):573–596. doi: 10.1007/s11056-019-09754-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao L, Liu H, Fu X, Zhang Z, Shen X, Ruan H. 2019. Comparison of UAV LiDAR and digital aerial photogrammetry point clouds for estimating forest structural attributes in subtropical planted forests. Forests. 10(2):145. doi: 10.3390/f10020145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Baldocchi D, Gong P, Kelly M. 2006. Isolating Individual Trees in a Savanna Woodland Using Small Footprint Lidar Data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 72(8):923–932. doi: 10.14358/PERS.72.8.923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Gong P, Baldocchi D, Tian YQ. 2007. Estimating basal area and stem volume for individual trees from lidar data. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sens. 73(12):1355–1365. doi: 10.14358/pers.73.12.1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Liu H, Feng Z, Shen C, Chen P, Ribeiro da Silva C. 2019. Applicability of personal laser scanning in forestry inventory. PloS One. 14(2):e0211392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Agency of Japan. 1970. Timber volume tables for Western Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Forestry Investigation Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Agency of Japan. Digitalization of forest resource information and promotion of smart forestry [internet]. [accessed 2024 Feb 5 2024]. https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/keikaku/smartforest/smart_forestry.html
   Google Scholar
• Goutte C, Gaussier E. 2005. A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and F-Score, with implication for evaluation. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 345–359. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-31865-1_25.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra-Hernández J, Cosenza DN, Rodriguez LCE, Silva M, Tomé M, Díaz-Varela RA, González-Ferreiro E. 2018. Comparison of ALS- and UAV(SfM)-derived high-density point clouds for individual tree detection in eucalyptus plantations. Int J Remote Sens. 39(15–16):5211–5235. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2018.1486519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda K, Takahashi T, Kitahara F. 2012. Reconsideration of the size and shape of the survey area in the selective sample plot method. J Jpn For Soc. 94(3):105–111. doi: 10.4005/jjfs.94.105.
   Google Scholar
• Hyyppä E, Yu X, Kaartinen H, Hakala T, Kukko A, Vastaranta M, Hyyppä J. 2020. Comparison of backpack, handheld, under-canopy UAV, and above-canopy UAV laser scanning for field reference data collection in boreal forests. Remote Sens. 12(20):3327. doi: 10.3390/rs12203327.
   Google Scholar
• Kankare V, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M, Räty M, Yu X, Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Alho P, Viitala R. 2013. Retrieval of forest aboveground biomass and stem volume with airborne scanning LiDAR. Remote Sens-basel [Internet]. 5(5):2257 2274. doi: 10.3390/rs5052257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kira T, Shidei T. 1967. Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the western pacific. Jpn J Ecol. 17(2):70–87. doi: 10.18960/seitai.17.2_70.
   Google Scholar
• Kuželka K, Slavík M, Surový P. 2020. Very high density point clouds from UAV laser scanning for automatic tree stem detection and direct diameter measurement. Remote Sens-Basel. 12(8):1236. doi: 10.3390/rs12081236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Hyyppä J. 2013. Automatic stem mapping by merging several terrestrial laser scans at the feature and decision levels. Sensors. 13(2):1614–1634. doi: 10.3390/s130201614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang X, Kukko A, Kaartinen H, Hyyppä J, Yu X, Jaakkola A, Wang Y. 2014. Possibilities of a Personal Laser Scanning System for Forest Mapping and Ecosystem Services. Sensors. 14(1):1228–1248. doi: 10.3390/s140101228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Shen X, Cao L, Wang G, Cao F. 2018. Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in ginkgo plantations. ISPRS J Photogramm. 146:465–482. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas H‐, Bienert A, Scheller S, Keane E. 2008. Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data. Int J Remote Sens. 29(5):1579–1593. doi: 10.1080/01431160701736406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe KT, Owari T, Furuya N, Hiroshima T, Morimoto J. 2020. Application of UAV photogrammetry with LiDAR data to facilitate the estimation of tree locations and DBH values for high-value timber species in northern Japanese mixed-wood forests. Remote Sens-Basel. 12(17):2865. doi: 10.3390/rs12172865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan M, Silva CA, Klauberg C, Jat P, Catts G, Cardil A, Hudak AT, Dia M. 2017. Individual tree detection from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest. Forests. 8(9):340. doi: 10.3390/f8090340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson K, Holmgren J, Olsson H. 2014. Tree Stem and Height Measurements using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and the RANSAC Algorithm. Remote Sens. 6(5):4323–4344. doi: 10.3390/rs6054323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oono K, Tsuyuki S. 2018. Estimating individual tree diameter and stem volume using airborne LiDAR in saga prefecture, Japan. Open J For. 8(02):205–228. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2018.82015.
   Google Scholar
• Picos J, Bastos G, Míguez D, Alonso L, Armesto J. 2020. Individual tree detection in a eucalyptus plantation using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-LiDAR. Remote Sens. 12(5):885. doi: 10.3390/rs12050885.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers SR, Manning I, Livingstone W. 2020. Comparing the spatial accuracy of digital surface models from four unoccupied aerial systems: photogrammetry versus LiDAR. Remote Sens-Basel. 12(17):2806. doi: 10.3390/rs12172806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Nishizono T, Kitahara F, Fukumoto K, Saito H. 2022. Integrating terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry to estimate individual tree attributes in managed coniferous forests in Japan. Int J Appl Earth Obs. 106:102658. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova M, Japkowicz N, Szpakowicz S. 2006. Beyond accuracy, F-Score and ROC: a family of discriminant measures for performance evaluation. Lect Notes Comput Sc. 1015–1021. doi: 10.1007/11941439_114.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Yamamoto K, Senda Y, Tsuzuku M. 2005. Predicting individual stem volumes of sugi (cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. J Forest Res-jpn. 10(4):305–312. doi: 10.1007/s10310-005-0150-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya B, Mochizuki H, Hoshikawa T, Suzuki S. 2023. Error estimation of trunk diameter and tree height measured with a backpack LiDAR system in Japanese plantation forests. Landsc Ecol Eng. 19(1):169–177. doi: 10.1007/s11355-022-00530-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace L, Lucieer A, Malenovský Z, Turner D, Vopěnka P. 2016. Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: a comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Forests. 7(3):62. doi: 10.3390/f7030062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Lehtomäki M, Liang X, Pyörälä J, Kukko A, Jaakkola A, Liu J, Feng Z, Chen R, Hyyppä J. 2019. Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – a comparison study of tree height estimates from field measurement, airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning in a boreal forest. ISPRS J Photogramm. 147:132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West PW. 2015. Tree and forest measurement. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-14708-6.
   Google Scholar
• White JC, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Vastaranta M, Hilker T, Tompalski P. 2016. Remote sensing technologies for enhancing forest inventories: a review. Can J Remote Sens. 42(5):619–641. doi: 10.1080/07038992.2016.1207484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Shen X, Cao L, Wang G, Cao F. 2019. Assessment of individual tree detection and canopy cover estimation using unmanned aerial vehicle based light detection and ranging (UAV-LiDAR) data in planted forests. Remote Sens-Basel. 11(8):908. doi: 10.3390/rs11080908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young DJN, Koontz MJ, Weeks J. 2022. Optimizing aerial imagery collection and processing parameters for drone‐based individual tree mapping in structurally complex conifer forests. Methods Ecol Evol. 13(7):1447–1463. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.13860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Hyyppä J, Vastaranta M, Holopainen M, Viitala R. 2011. Predicting individual tree attributes from airborne laser point clouds based on the random forests technique. ISPRS J Photogramm. 66(1):28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar